[CW] Staghound

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Katusha]

This unit is too effective to be priced at 80 fuel. Any braindead idiot can make this unit pay off its mediocre cost. 80 fuel, I mean does nobody see anything wrong with that?

When I use these, i've consistenly gotten 15-20 kills on them, and seen others do way better. It can circlestrafe marders and 50mm's easily, and also paks. The 50 cal upgrade is also very effective at 35 MU. (I must say however i've used them with RCA double T3's, perhaps that's what needs nerfing most)

[Demon767]

when you say i use these, why didnt you make the thread earlier huh?

[Katusha]

when you say i use these, why didnt you make the thread earlier huh?

i was planning to?

Edit: i use 2 of them, unlike some people..... so it didnt really make it dumbfuck easy for me to win games, just cleared up a lot of infantry

check #1 on staghound leaderboard, u mad?

[jackmccrack]

yet we do not see vet 3 staghounds

[Tymathee]

Are you basing this off your own use or another players? Because if another players, you dont know what buffs they have and you have to base it off skill level. A skilled player can turn a bike into a deadly weapon and make it seem OP

[jackmccrack]

oi Ktausha you have the highest rank staghound right now

[Katusha]

oi Ktausha you have the highest rank staghound right now

i wasnt posting it to show off, just wanted to show i use them

Basing it off my own and others. As I said I use 2 of them, but how easy is it to spam them? 80 fuel at 8 pop, can kill stugs and marders, and face off shrek squads at long range. Awesome eh?

And what I've seen around the balance forums is, balance is based on the best possible use of the unit, so that's no argument tym

[Tymathee]

i wasnt posting it to show off, just wanted to show i use them

Basing it off my own and others. As I said I use 2 of them, but how easy is it to spam them? 80 fuel at 8 pop, can kill stugs and marders, and face off shrek squads at long range. Awesome eh?

And what I've seen around the balance forums is, balance is based on the best possible use of the unit, so that's no argument tym

really? then m-10's need to be seriously nerfed then because the best use of the unit it's one of the best AI and AT units in the game. same with stugs, tigers, KT's, oak leaves, sapper piats, sapper flamers, firefly's, etc.

[Katusha]

No, you see the difference between M10's and staghounds is price and vulnerability. M10's are great AT, but they are easy to take down, and are not 80 FU as said staghound. It is pretty easy to lose an m10, I think you'll agree with me there.

Staghounds on the other hand, are FAST, can EAT pak shots and shrek shots, in a way that a light vehicle should not be able to soak in so much damage and escape. Combined speed and pretty high HP for 80 fuel is ridiculous.

[Poppi]

is it me or do stags come with higher pen than t17s?

[AmPM]

They do. But slower RoF

[DarkSoldierX]

They do. But slower RoF

And higher raw accursey, but worse target tables.

[RikiRude]

relic was so lazy with the stag/t17, its two much different units with the same model, seriously, they couldnt take the time to make a different model for one of the factions?

[BigDick]

stag is great unit because it can take on infantry, light vehicles and even tanks (in support)

but it already lost a bit of its health some time ago
as rca i prefer cromwells but without doc buffs or on other docs stags almost always pay off

[Tymathee]

relic was so lazy with the stag/t17, its two much different units with the same model, seriously, they couldnt take the time to make a different model for one of the factions?

or use a diff light vehicle since i dont think the brits used it much. RCA needs the RAm