nugnugx
Donator
 Posts: 4051
|
|
« on: July 23, 2011, 02:38:54 pm » |
|
This is only an idea thread so don't go OMGBBQWTFnub  What if inf and support weapons on max vet could buy extra 1 man ? maybe 1 extra man for 1 every vet level for inf (support still on max vet only) ? This would up the survivability of inf vs all the LV and tank spam and i think would be fun to see for example 6 kch vs 9 rangers |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 23, 2011, 02:40:48 pm by nugnugx »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| RoyalHants
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2011, 02:41:41 pm » |
|
NUG Y U START SO MANY THREADS 4!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yeah calbanes, I mean - some people like smokaz are still yet to win a single game, even though they've been around here for years.
  |
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2011, 02:42:10 pm » |
|
NUG Y U START SO MANY THREADS 4!!!!!
because i have ideas 4!!!!!!! now stop spamming. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| RoyalHants
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2011, 02:43:48 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Poppi
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2011, 03:19:09 pm » |
|
This is only an idea thread so don't go OMGBBQWTFnub What if inf and support weapons on max vet could buy extra 1 man ? maybe 1 extra man for 1 every vet level for inf (support still on max vet only) ? This would up the survivability of inf vs all the LV and tank spam and i think would be fun to see for example 6 kch vs 9 rangers but wouldnt just one extra man mean like +25% health and damage for some of axis units and like only +16% for allied? adding +1 to a smaller number means higher % gains. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 23, 2011, 03:23:02 pm by Poppi »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Vermillion_Hawk
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2011, 03:23:12 pm » |
|
I'm more concerned about performance issues. I know I can handle a full-on battle with artillery flying everywhere with nary a drop in my framerate, however, a lot of people here seem to run this game on prehistoric computers. Adding in more men on screen would not help the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
- Andre Malraux
- Dracula
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2011, 03:50:30 pm » |
|
I know you said don't say it.... But.... OMGBBQWTFnub This idea is terribad. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2011, 04:14:41 pm » |
|
7 kch all with mp44 vs 9 rangers with what 4/5 thompsons?
7 KCH would walk over anything,literally!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2011, 04:31:12 pm » |
|
Except 9 man BAR Rifle squads!
Or imagine this, 6 man double schrek stormies....looool
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
| Poppi
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2011, 04:34:30 pm » |
|
I'm more concerned about performance issues. I know I can handle a full-on battle with artillery flying everywhere with nary a drop in my framerate, however, a lot of people here seem to run this game on prehistoric computers. Adding in more men on screen would not help the problem.
ya whats up with EIR players? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2011, 04:41:48 pm » |
|
Except 9 man BAR Rifle squads!
Or imagine this, 6 man double schrek stormies....looool
and would do what with 2/3 bars to 7man KCH? lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pandaExpress
Donator
Posts: 282
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2011, 04:56:12 pm » |
|
who said that the extra mans would get mp44s
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
they tell me i'm weird i tell them their normal
|
|
|
pandaExpress
Donator
Posts: 282
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2011, 04:57:13 pm » |
|
i would be guessing it would have 3\4 mp44s max and extra guy would have rifles and if mp44s die they carry over
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2011, 06:44:20 pm » |
|
and would do what with 2/3 bars to 7man KCH? lol
The same thing I currently do with 3 BARs vs 4 KCH, suppress them to shit, then kill them and lolz. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
