Defensive

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Dnice559]

move artillery experts to the top tier please, its retarded not to get the most out of the 88s! They are already super expensive and makes it really hard not to oversupply!


Thanks in advance! Looking forward to the change!

[TheVolskinator]

Gork's spammage of 3+ 88s makes this request stupid in my eyes. They rape face as is, no need to make the top T4 a lolwtfrapemachine.

[sverker]

its not like the 88s become op in any way they cost like hell and because they are so cool they should be promoted so people start using them

[nugnugx]

and what will happen with top t3 ?

top t4 gives heroic and 125 hp to 88 so if anything it would be better to move those 2 buffs to bottom t4.

[smurfORnot]

Gork's spammage of 3+ 88s makes this request stupid in my eyes. They rape face as is, no need to make the top T4 a lolwtfrapemachine.

yea,gork spammed 88 and stukas,and failed with them most of the time,so I dont see how this affects him,lol...

spamming 88 is actually counter productive,2-3 are more than enough.

[MorkaandBorka]

move artillery experts to the top tier please, its retarded not to get the most out of the 88s! They are already super expensive and makes it really hard not to oversupply!


Thanks in advance! Looking forward to the change!

its not like the 88s become op in any way they cost like hell and because they are so cool they should be promoted so people start using them

This is actually really funny coming from the people who only play allies attack and set up two flaks the beginning every fucking game?

Is it cuz we just rocked your fail defensive fort that you wanna buff an already awesome unit for no reason?  It makes no sense...

I love you dnicee but you gotta stop this tbh.  You guys only play allies attack to take advantage of your companies, which is in your right, but dont say you wanna buff the flak, err defensive t4.

[RikiRude]

i think that would give too many buffs to the 88. i mean as a defensive player, that would be a dream come true, id just have medic bunkers and 88s all over the place. but i think it would be OP. but i agree the defensive  doctrine in general could use a looking at in the future, just to have some things moved around a little bit.

[Tymathee]

as a rule (thats' not always followed) the same unit shouldn't be buffed twice on the same tree

[EIRRMod]

as a rule (thats' not always followed) the same unit shouldn't be buffed twice on the same tree

Sort of.

Its basically 'Just dont make something OMGWTFBBQ' along the same tree.

[Tymathee]

and putting arty experts at the top would do that im sure cuz then u can buff the 88 with 30% more dmg and acc, have arty and make it hard to kill it (since it'll have elite armor crits and 4 men instead of 3)

[nugnugx]

(since it'll have elite armor crits and 4 men instead of 3)

it does not get 4 men


also if tiers would be swapped i don't see how you would get 30% buff.

[Tymathee]

it does not get 4 men


also if tiers would be swapped i don't see how you would get 30% buff.

bottom t3 lgives you 10% more officer bonus. base i think is either 20% or 25%, arty includes the 88.