AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 19, 2011, 02:27:16 pm » |
|
It's the difference between 1 tank and 2 as well. Evens out pretty well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 19, 2011, 02:36:05 pm » |
|
I guess.
i personally think lower deflection damage would be more fun, more realistic and more useful.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
TheVolskinator
Administrator / Lead Developer
 Posts: 3012
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 19, 2011, 02:40:48 pm » |
|
I guess.
i personally think lower deflection damage would be more fun, more realistic and more useful.
... -.- |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| SaintPauli
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 19, 2011, 03:07:11 pm » |
|
Stop making stupid doctrine names! There were no ablative armor in WW2. You might as well call it plasma shields. How about a doctrine that unlocks laser cannons?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Audemed
Donator
Posts: 644
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 19, 2011, 03:10:30 pm » |
|
FUCK YEAH I LUV LAZERZ.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 19, 2011, 03:27:59 pm » |
|
Lazer cannons sounds quite fine as long as its balanced.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 19, 2011, 04:13:21 pm » |
|
thats why this is called ablative "plating"  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 19, 2011, 04:46:58 pm » |
|
ahhahhaah! i had no idea the whole concept of ablative armor was based on space ships! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ablative_armorand reactive armor wasnt even in development until after wwII hmm, knowing how much EIRRMOD likes those spaceship games im surprised he didnt try to sneak in phasers for infantry while he was at it too  now im trying to rack my brain to figure something out that would actually make sense to give the tanks some sort of boost, all i can think of is "improvised armor" to give it any kind of buffs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 19, 2011, 05:25:54 pm » |
|
4 man kch = phaser infantry
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CommieKiller
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 19, 2011, 07:41:56 pm » |
|
really should change name from ablative to overrepair.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| COHCommando
|
|
« Reply #30 on: August 19, 2011, 07:57:02 pm » |
|
THE ONE THING I LIKE ABOUT THIS MOD AND YOU TAKE IT AWAY FROM ME I REALLY HATE YOU WHO STARTED THIS FORUM AND I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU ARE CRYING ABOUT THIS ITS CALLED ANTI TANK ITS A T4 FOR GOODNESS SAKES FREAKING NOOBS DON'T KNOW HOW TO COUNTER THINGS,but I will say that too much in Royal engis stacks on each other
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheVolskinator
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 3012
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 19, 2011, 08:51:44 pm » |
|
^Madbro.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| RoyalHants
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 20, 2011, 11:57:41 am » |
|
he mad
would this be the wrong place to say when i try to click on my company screen on my engies account it crashes
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yeah calbanes, I mean - some people like smokaz are still yet to win a single game, even though they've been around here for years.
  |
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #33 on: August 20, 2011, 12:02:22 pm » |
|
he mad
would this be the wrong place to say when i try to click on my company screen on my engies account it crashes
look around in the other RE bug posts, someone had the same problem and i THINK a dev responded to it with a fix. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
