[US][PE] SF/G43

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[TheVolskinator]

AmPm, you seem to miss some of the wording I put into my posts.

When I said "MGs get Suppressing Fire", i meant the ability--your tank has it on it's UI, and the suppression of its turret mounted top MG is drastically increased, in addition to your hull and coaxial MGs--much the same as Tank Shock, but much more useful. This isnt PE slow for tanks, thats just silly. Im proposing giving BARs PE slow to replace Suppressing Fire, since Slow can only target one squad at a time.

[Smokaz]

If we're nerfing supressive fire for bars/g43s/fg42s, mg supression for wehr/americans and the PE se/luft mgs should be increased. Supression is supposed to be a core mechanic and a reliable force multiplier. MGs were used for a reason, bla bla bla. if the game gets any more dumbed down now I'm gonna puke.

[CrazyWR]

im ok with SF from mg's, just not IWIN buttons from basic infantry.  Thats why button got nerfed...

[3rdCondor]

+1

[AmPM]

AmPm, you seem to miss some of the wording I put into my posts.

When I said "MGs get Suppressing Fire", i meant the ability--your tank has it on it's UI, and the suppression of its turret mounted top MG is drastically increased, in addition to your hull and coaxial MGs--much the same as Tank Shock, but much more useful. This isnt PE slow for tanks, thats just silly. Im proposing giving BARs PE slow to replace Suppressing Fire, since Slow can only target one squad at a time.

So basically, Tank Suppression Fire would only be useful for Allies, because the majority of Allied AT Infantry has FIRE UP. Good balancing there.

[nikomas]

So basically, Tank Suppression Fire would only be useful for Allies, because the majority of Allied AT Infantry has FIRE UP. Good balancing there.

Haha, shrecks just got thrown out of the game with this idea 
M10 supression team go!

[TheVolskinator]

Right, because the Axis would never want to suppress riflemen, sappers, or mandos after their smoke wears off, not to mention exhausted rangers and AB. Nice logic there.

[nikomas]

Right, because the Axis would never want to suppress riflemen, sappers, or mandos after their smoke wears off, not to mention exhausted rangers and AB. Nice logic there.

Personally when I play blitz, infantry is the least of the worries (barring complete spam)... thing is that just backing up will save you from just about any allied at infantry, at least from my experience.

[AmPM]

Right, because the Axis would never want to suppress riflemen, sappers, or mandos after their smoke wears off, not to mention exhausted rangers and AB. Nice logic there.

Actually they wouldn't, suppression means worse accuracy, so why suppress something that you can either drive away from or just kite and kill?

It would need to be a slow effect to be useful.

[Smokaz]

Lol, Last game I played I used a blob of 4 bar squads to supress terror 4 man kch. Pretty fun when you can pin em!

[CrazyWR]

you only need 1 at a time for that...

[Smokaz]

you only need 1 at a time for that...

Wehrmacht players without mgs, gotta love em.