M-10 & M-18

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Tymathee]

Anybody feel these two are too much alike?

So much so that everyone now uses the cheaper m-18 and passes on the m-10 now.

M-18 is faster, same damage, same rof, longer sight and gets two upgrades.

M-10 gets...nothing.

Something needs to change to make picking one or the other a tougher choice.

Sure you get more pen with an m-10 but not enough to justify the price difference.

300-200 for M-10
300-185 for M-18

9 pool for both, and a lower vet requirement for m-18

So with being able to get a .50 cal, even if its not as good as the sherman and cheap hawkins mines, even if they're not used. The m18 is faster, has more accel and decl, same health, same armor.

M18 needs i guess a price change, maybe make both the same price. i dunno.

I liked AMPM's idea of making the m10 more like an allied marder, kinda in the same vein as the 95mm is to the stug, make the m10 have a slow rotation, more range, maybe more power. It not only would differentiate the two between each other but would give the allies a sorta mobile atg just like PE, WM and CW have. (50mm, marder, g-wagon, firefly).

[PonySlaystation]

It think it would make for more interesting gameplay if the Hellcat was better but also more expensive.

That's also how it was in reality. I remember when I first saw a Hellcat in vCOH, I was like "holy shit, better bring my tank destroyers". But then I was disappointed because it was more or less identical to the M10.

[Poppi]

from playing i thought the m10 was way faster and better acc.

[Tymathee]

from playing i thought the m10 was way faster and better acc.

it used to be but it was changed. 7.4 vs 6.8 and 2 vs 1.8 i think. M18 is now the faster, quicker tank but with poorer pathing cuz of its size.

[hans]

make the hellcat similar to the panther