Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #40 on: December 22, 2011, 07:34:12 pm » |
|
8=============D
If CoH2 comes out EIRR will die for some time...
Depends on how easy it would be to port |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
| Vermillion_Hawk
|
|
« Reply #41 on: December 22, 2011, 08:12:22 pm » |
|
Even if it was easy it would still come Soon(tm).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
- Andre Malraux
- Dracula
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #42 on: December 22, 2011, 08:13:54 pm » |
|
8=============D
If CoH2 comes out EIRR will die for some time...
Someone needs to find EIRRMods post where he promised to make an EIRR for a new coh =) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
 |
|
|
Computer991
Donator
 Posts: 1219
|
|
« Reply #43 on: December 22, 2011, 08:17:53 pm » |
|
Depends on how easy it would be to port
Depends on what engine CoH2 uses. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
 Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #44 on: December 22, 2011, 08:24:42 pm » |
|
Most of the backend stuff will transfer if they use a similar structure. Seeing how DoW 1 and 2 used the same system it's a good assumption that CoH2 will. Exact file types and of course all the doctrines would need to be redone but given the fact we have a team of people already and a community to pull from the downtime wouldn't be much. The inclusion of mod tools would be the best first step.
On a personal note I'd play the shit out of it first. I'd love to see what fun shit an updated engine could do.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #45 on: December 22, 2011, 08:26:39 pm » |
|
I'd like to have a fresh start. Maybe it doesn't even need EIR, maybe it's already something like it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Computer991
Donator
Posts: 1219
|
|
« Reply #46 on: December 22, 2011, 08:27:50 pm » |
|
We can hope so...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #47 on: December 22, 2011, 09:05:39 pm » |
|
I wouldn't be too gutted if they decided to give the modern era a shot. There really aren't any decent modern combat RTS's around at the moment tbh - Unless I've overlooked one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #48 on: December 22, 2011, 09:16:16 pm » |
|
Korea would be interesting
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #49 on: December 22, 2011, 09:28:59 pm » |
|
I wouldn't be too gutted if they decided to give the modern era a shot. There really aren't any decent modern combat RTS's around at the moment tbh - Unless I've overlooked one.
Act of War is the only one that comes to mind. But yeah, a Coh2 in iraq could be awesome. the only issue i could see is that every war after ww2 the US has been the big dog, so you feel like a big bully. probaly best to stick to ww2, so many things they can do. they've got the african theater and the pacific theater they've yet to hit and they can add in navel combat if they wish. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
 Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #50 on: December 22, 2011, 09:34:14 pm » |
|
Act of war... such a great game...
No, Eugine... Such a great study, I'm silly hyped for Wargames:EE
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets. |
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #51 on: December 23, 2011, 01:00:43 am » |
|
Tym, your ideas are all terrible, it will probably be Eastern Front but 1000x better than the crappy vcoh mod.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #52 on: December 23, 2011, 02:42:46 am » |
|
Why does the US have to be involved?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #53 on: December 23, 2011, 12:57:09 pm » |
|
They don't tbh, but a lot of the major conflicts in recent history have kinda revolved around their involvement.
I wouldn't mind seeing some hypothetical conflicts rather than sticking to established history/current events.
EU kicking it off against China or Russia might make for an interesting conflict. I'd kill to see a Harrier working properly in a good quality RTS.
Then again, stupid UK, we went and ditched all our friggin Harriers and by the looks of it are fobbing them off to the US. -.-'
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| RoyalHants
|
|
« Reply #54 on: December 23, 2011, 01:23:22 pm » |
|
Could do A COH Falklands then My Guess is If it's not WW2 it'll be Korean or Vietnam war |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yeah calbanes, I mean - some people like smokaz are still yet to win a single game, even though they've been around here for years.
  |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #55 on: December 23, 2011, 01:47:43 pm » |
|
Tym, your ideas are all terrible, it will probably be Eastern Front but 1000x better than the crappy vcoh mod.
how are my ideas all terrible? I think an infantry focused pacific theatre would be awesome. African would be tank focused. eastern front imo would be good, get the US out of there, make it Russia vs Germany. 2 sides, could be fun. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Poppi
|
|
« Reply #56 on: December 23, 2011, 01:49:25 pm » |
|
how are my ideas all terrible? I think an infantry focused pacific theatre would be awesome. African would be tank focused.
eastern front imo would be good, get the US out of there, make it Russia vs Germany. 2 sides, could be fun.
just russians and germans ? no thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #57 on: December 23, 2011, 02:01:10 pm » |
|
just russians and germans ? no thanks.
why? if its eastern front focused, theres no other side. if its african, it's americans and germans, maybe french, brits and italians (which is the rumor that it is) pacific, US & Japanese. Either way i feel they start with 2 sides then expand. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #58 on: December 25, 2011, 09:57:36 am » |
|
The Pacific theater doesn't work in an RTS and North Africa isn't exactly great eaither.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EscforrealityTLS
|
|
« Reply #59 on: December 25, 2011, 11:12:13 am » |
|
if its african, it's americans and germans, maybe french, brits and italians (which is the rumor that it is) pacific, US & Japanese.
Are you sure about that statement Tym? It is your understanding the African theatre focused primarily around German and American armies, really? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pwanawan baby!
|
|
|
|
