*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2024, 07:28:36 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: brit inf vs 4 man kch  (Read 14226 times)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2012, 05:32:32 pm »

rifle nades...they do 1.5 dmg vs kch, just like all nades.
The only thing riflenades are good for is retreating enemies.
Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2012, 05:56:16 pm »

rifle nades...they do 1.5 dmg vs kch, just like all nades.
1. Its 25% more for all nades
2. Riflenades are way too random to kill a assault squad like KCH thats going to always be on the move

Again, you need vet 2 lt or mando lt buffing your upgraded non-doc inf inorder to deal some proper damage with them.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
jackmccrack Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2484


« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2012, 06:05:58 pm »

Use the Brens to BUTTON the KCH, DUH!  Cool
Logged

Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2012, 07:59:51 pm »

The only thing riflenades are good for is retreating enemies.

sounds good to me "oh look kch, fire riflenades. haha they run, effective!"

Running > Killing Yer d00dz
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2012, 08:03:20 pm »

Rifle nades should rarely be used head on. Always try to find a shot blocker to hide behind.
Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2012, 12:02:35 pm »

Tankedit: No unrelated pics please


SOOOO MAAAAAD

not even marksman training did it! they just get rolled over
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 05:52:21 pm by tank130 » Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
CafeMilani Offline
Aloha
*
Posts: 2994



« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2012, 12:06:29 pm »

Tankedit: No unrelated pics please
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 05:52:30 pm by tank130 » Logged

DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2012, 12:09:19 pm »

Tankedit: No unrelated pics please


SOOOO MAAAAAD

not even marksman training did it! they just get rolled over
and now you know why I tried to get KCH price increased a long time ago.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 05:52:48 pm by tank130 » Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2012, 12:13:50 pm »

trying to counter most expensive AI infantry with mainline infantry is just a bit wierd

but yeah keep trying  Cool Cool Cool

and now you know why I tried to get KCH price increased a long time ago.

tell us

my guess: cos ur tyms (white?) twin?
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #29 on: January 16, 2012, 12:48:01 pm »

trying to counter most expensive AI infantry with mainline infantry is just a bit wierd

but yeah keep trying  Cool Cool Cool

tell us

my guess: cos ur tyms (white?) twin?
Im nothing like tym. He just says random stuff. I put in my facts.

And the facts are -

KCH have massive resistances against all smallarms DPS and surpression. They also have huge crit resistances against small arms/tank guns/mortars ect.
They only have a DPS weakness against nades and flamethrowers.

Funny thing is rangers only have resistance smallarms, and a much weaker surpression resistance. No huge crit avoiding bonuses. No live men from tiger shots. Still can get critted from explosives at yellow. All that shit. And they have less DPS and lower HP per man.
Yet they share nearly the same DPS weakness against flamethrowers.

They also don't have far superior doc bonuses.

Face it, terror is ezmode.
Logged
CafeMilani Offline
Aloha
*
Posts: 2994



« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2012, 12:49:34 pm »

Im nothing like tym. He just says random stuff. I put in my facts.

cut. didnt read on. but i laughed
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #31 on: January 16, 2012, 12:55:42 pm »

the thing is that you can stack a ridicolus amounts of buffs on those KCH, making them turn into something that deals more dps than a staghound at close rage and takes very little in return.

as brits you also can't freaking chase them with any normal infantry weapons
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #32 on: January 16, 2012, 01:02:09 pm »

l2use vehicless maybe?

its like:

that fuckn sniper did annoyed me last game, my 3 mg and mortar start failed horrible


dunno but i never had troubles vs. kch - maybe cos i dont refuse to use vehicles at all
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #33 on: January 16, 2012, 01:14:30 pm »

trying to counter most expensive AI infantry with mainline infantry is just a bit wierd

but yeah keep trying  Cool Cool Cool

tell us

my guess: cos ur tyms (white?) twin?

yeah cuz i so didn't support normal kch being decreased in price.

i only think 4 man need to go up but 3 man is fine where it is. i guess you forget i play wm as well.
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #34 on: January 16, 2012, 01:24:02 pm »

so almost 400mp and at least 165 mun is to cheap for 9 pool eating AI only kch?

i don't think so

8 squad will eat 100% of ur inf pool without using any other inf at all

when i played vs. some oak leaves spamers (like kknd etc.) i always new after beating these guys they will be almost out of stuff
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #35 on: January 16, 2012, 01:29:47 pm »

so almost 400mp and at least 165 mun is to cheap for 9 pool eating AI only kch?

i don't think so

8 squad will eat 100% of ur inf pool without using any other inf at all

when i played vs. some oak leaves spamers (like kknd etc.) i always new after beating these guys they will be almost out of stuff

KCH are better supporting AT than brens, thats for sure.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #36 on: January 16, 2012, 01:31:21 pm »

l2use vehicless maybe?

its like:

that fuckn sniper did annoyed me last game, my 3 mg and mortar start failed horrible


dunno but i never had troubles vs. kch - maybe cos i dont refuse to use vehicles at all

what kind of axis infantry orientated & infantry buffing doctrine - has to pull out its light vehicles to fight other buffed infantry? I'd like to know. When does luft, blitz, terror pull on light vehicles to handle allied infantry?

double standards, rattenwaffe, kacknase, gg.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #37 on: January 16, 2012, 01:34:09 pm »

meh i agree. i just hate going against them although i dont have as many issues lately since I pretty much expect them now a days.

and meh ur right. they seemed to have a PPM system going on.

3 man kch are 96.67mp and 36.67mu per man
4 man kch are 95mp and 35mu per man

making them more cost effective although not much.
what kind of axis infantry orientated & infantry buffing doctrine - has to pull out its light vehicles to fight other buffed infantry? I'd like to know. When does luft, blitz, terror pull on light vehicles to handle allied infantry?

double standards, rattenwaffe, kacknase, gg.

good point, wm doesn't have to pull out vehicles to handle allied infantry, just bring up more infantry. lmg, hmg, mp44, they just laugh, while allies have to bring up vehicles and artillery.

but i guess thats just how the factions are oriented, although it sux that

axis vehicles > allied vehicles > axis infantry > allied infantry
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #38 on: January 16, 2012, 01:36:03 pm »

lightvehicles? hardly cos wehr light armor is just fail....

but without tanks on the field it can be pretty hard against vehiclespam
or as PE way around - vehicle based company (e.g. tankhunters middle T3) with just scoutcars as inf replacement, 50mm etc. is pretty fail vs zookrifle companies with some ATGs in support (only thing my 24 scoutcar company failled horrible)

but whatever should i look in forums for ur posts where you complained that your vet3 oak leaves company isn't doing that well?  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

failtroll fjordwalruss   Cool
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 01:41:35 pm by BigDick » Logged
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #39 on: January 16, 2012, 01:42:07 pm »

one issue with 4 man kch is that you get 33% more KCH for 20% more popcost.
very popcost effective unit..
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 36 queries.