aeroblade56
Development
 Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2012, 05:32:32 pm » |
|
rifle nades...they do 1.5 dmg vs kch, just like all nades.
The only thing riflenades are good for is retreating enemies. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2012, 05:56:16 pm » |
|
rifle nades...they do 1.5 dmg vs kch, just like all nades.
1. Its 25% more for all nades 2. Riflenades are way too random to kill a assault squad like KCH thats going to always be on the move Again, you need vet 2 lt or mando lt buffing your upgraded non-doc inf inorder to deal some proper damage with them. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
| jackmccrack
|
|
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2012, 06:05:58 pm » |
|
Use the Brens to BUTTON the KCH, DUH!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2012, 07:59:51 pm » |
|
The only thing riflenades are good for is retreating enemies.
sounds good to me "oh look kch, fire riflenades. haha they run, effective!" Running > Killing Yer d00dz |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2012, 08:03:20 pm » |
|
Rifle nades should rarely be used head on. Always try to find a shot blocker to hide behind.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
 Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2012, 12:02:35 pm » |
|
Tankedit: No unrelated pics please
SOOOO MAAAAAD
not even marksman training did it! they just get rolled over
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 05:52:21 pm by tank130 »
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2012, 12:06:29 pm » |
|
Tankedit: No unrelated pics please
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 05:52:30 pm by tank130 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2012, 12:09:19 pm » |
|
Tankedit: No unrelated pics please
SOOOO MAAAAAD
not even marksman training did it! they just get rolled over
and now you know why I tried to get KCH price increased a long time ago. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 05:52:48 pm by tank130 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2012, 12:13:50 pm » |
|
trying to counter most expensive AI infantry with mainline infantry is just a bit wierd but yeah keep trying and now you know why I tried to get KCH price increased a long time ago.
tell us my guess: cos ur tyms (white?) twin? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #29 on: January 16, 2012, 12:48:01 pm » |
|
trying to counter most expensive AI infantry with mainline infantry is just a bit wierd but yeah keep trying tell us my guess: cos ur tyms (white?) twin? Im nothing like tym. He just says random stuff. I put in my facts. And the facts are - KCH have massive resistances against all smallarms DPS and surpression. They also have huge crit resistances against small arms/tank guns/mortars ect. They only have a DPS weakness against nades and flamethrowers. Funny thing is rangers only have resistance smallarms, and a much weaker surpression resistance. No huge crit avoiding bonuses. No live men from tiger shots. Still can get critted from explosives at yellow. All that shit. And they have less DPS and lower HP per man. Yet they share nearly the same DPS weakness against flamethrowers. They also don't have far superior doc bonuses. Face it, terror is ezmode. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2012, 12:49:34 pm » |
|
Im nothing like tym. He just says random stuff. I put in my facts.
cut. didnt read on. but i laughed |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #31 on: January 16, 2012, 12:55:42 pm » |
|
the thing is that you can stack a ridicolus amounts of buffs on those KCH, making them turn into something that deals more dps than a staghound at close rage and takes very little in return.
as brits you also can't freaking chase them with any normal infantry weapons
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #32 on: January 16, 2012, 01:02:09 pm » |
|
l2use vehicless maybe?
its like:
that fuckn sniper did annoyed me last game, my 3 mg and mortar start failed horrible
dunno but i never had troubles vs. kch - maybe cos i dont refuse to use vehicles at all
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #33 on: January 16, 2012, 01:14:30 pm » |
|
trying to counter most expensive AI infantry with mainline infantry is just a bit wierd but yeah keep trying tell us my guess: cos ur tyms (white?) twin? yeah cuz i so didn't support normal kch being decreased in price. i only think 4 man need to go up but 3 man is fine where it is. i guess you forget i play wm as well. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #34 on: January 16, 2012, 01:24:02 pm » |
|
so almost 400mp and at least 165 mun is to cheap for 9 pool eating AI only kch?
i don't think so
8 squad will eat 100% of ur inf pool without using any other inf at all
when i played vs. some oak leaves spamers (like kknd etc.) i always new after beating these guys they will be almost out of stuff
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #35 on: January 16, 2012, 01:29:47 pm » |
|
so almost 400mp and at least 165 mun is to cheap for 9 pool eating AI only kch?
i don't think so
8 squad will eat 100% of ur inf pool without using any other inf at all
when i played vs. some oak leaves spamers (like kknd etc.) i always new after beating these guys they will be almost out of stuff
KCH are better supporting AT than brens, thats for sure. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #36 on: January 16, 2012, 01:31:21 pm » |
|
l2use vehicless maybe?
its like:
that fuckn sniper did annoyed me last game, my 3 mg and mortar start failed horrible
dunno but i never had troubles vs. kch - maybe cos i dont refuse to use vehicles at all
what kind of axis infantry orientated & infantry buffing doctrine - has to pull out its light vehicles to fight other buffed infantry? I'd like to know. When does luft, blitz, terror pull on light vehicles to handle allied infantry? double standards, rattenwaffe, kacknase, gg. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #37 on: January 16, 2012, 01:34:09 pm » |
|
meh i agree. i just hate going against them although i dont have as many issues lately since I pretty much expect them now a days. and meh ur right. they seemed to have a PPM system going on. 3 man kch are 96.67mp and 36.67mu per man 4 man kch are 95mp and 35mu per man making them more cost effective although not much. what kind of axis infantry orientated & infantry buffing doctrine - has to pull out its light vehicles to fight other buffed infantry? I'd like to know. When does luft, blitz, terror pull on light vehicles to handle allied infantry?
double standards, rattenwaffe, kacknase, gg.
good point, wm doesn't have to pull out vehicles to handle allied infantry, just bring up more infantry. lmg, hmg, mp44, they just laugh, while allies have to bring up vehicles and artillery. but i guess thats just how the factions are oriented, although it sux that axis vehicles > allied vehicles > axis infantry > allied infantry |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #38 on: January 16, 2012, 01:36:03 pm » |
|
lightvehicles? hardly cos wehr light armor is just fail.... but without tanks on the field it can be pretty hard against vehiclespam or as PE way around - vehicle based company (e.g. tankhunters middle T3) with just scoutcars as inf replacement, 50mm etc. is pretty fail vs zookrifle companies with some ATGs in support (only thing my 24 scoutcar company failled horrible) but whatever should i look in forums for ur posts where you complained that your vet3 oak leaves company isn't doing that well?  failtroll fjordwalruss |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 01:41:35 pm by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #39 on: January 16, 2012, 01:42:07 pm » |
|
one issue with 4 man kch is that you get 33% more KCH for 20% more popcost.
very popcost effective unit..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
