IQ Test

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[TheWindCriesMary]

See Vermillion! That is a run-on sentence. Except the difference between you and Myst is that he did it on purpose and you did it because you write like an underdeveloped caveman with a thesaurus.

[Smokaz]

-1 point for using the invented-by-tym trollface

[Sachaztan]

Is verm a native English speaker? What is his nationality anyway?

[Mister Schmidt]

Canadian

[Sachaztan]

Canadian

So is it French or English for him? I mean, there are some territories in Canada where French is the native language right?

[Mister Schmidt]

Yeah, but English is his native

[NightRain]

-1 point for using the invented-by-tym trollface

+1

[Spartan_Marine88]

See Vermillion! That is a run-on sentence. Except the difference between you and Myst is that he did it on purpose and you did it because you write like an underdeveloped caveman with a thesaurus.

Wind gains respect in my books again.

[Sachaztan]

Yeah, but English is his native

Then he really doesn't have an excuse

[Vermillion_Hawk]

I was inclined to take Tank's advice but unfortunately my hand has been forced. If you had, perhaps, studied English past the high-school level, you would know that a run-on sentence is, in fact, not a grammatical error but merely stylistically incorrect, unless intentionally used in said manner. I intentionally use what a lesser acolyte of the English language would term as a run-on sentence for purposes which relate heavily to my profession: rhetoric.

[Mysthalin]

A rhetorical profession must be fun.

[Spartan_Marine88]

I was inclined to take Tank's advice but unfortunately my hand has been forced. If you had, perhaps, studied English past the high-school level, you would know that a run-on sentence is, in fact, not a grammatical error but merely stylistically incorrect, unless intentionally used in said manner. I intentionally use what a lesser acolyte of the English language would term as a run-on sentence for purposes which relate heavily to my profession: rhetoric.

That sentence is a piss poor cover.

Even though my English is quite good, i prefer to say things straight so that there is little confusion. You are getting fucking annoying Vermillion.

When you say things simply and straight forward (as with certain video game topics) i often find myself agreeing with you and see you in a different light. But when you try to be wordy and arrogant you just come out as a whiny undereducated dick who strives to put him self above everyone on the internet.

[TheWindCriesMary]

I was inclined to take Tank's advice but unfortunately my hand has been forced. If you had, perhaps, studied English past the high-school level, you would know that a run-on sentence is, in fact, not a grammatical error but merely stylistically incorrect, unless intentionally used in said manner. I intentionally use what a lesser acolyte of the English language would term as a run-on sentence for purposes which relate heavily to my profession: rhetoric.

Actually, no.

Grammatically, you are hopelessly inept at utilizing proper punctuation and/or a funny little convention known as a conjunction. You abuse commas horrifically and mangle five to six different sentence subjects together without most of the minimal grammar concerns that would be necessary to sustain them. They end up being these weird, awkward and completely breathless tangents that just ramble on aimlessly like a homeless person suffering from alcohol withdrawl.

A run-on sentence can technically go on forever IF the writer is extremely competent at correctly using punctuation. You, on the other hand, construct your sentences atrociously.

So not only are you ineffective at making stylistic run-on sentences, you're also inept at the grammatical considerations that would make that attempt even remotely possible.

Simply speaking, you're a poor communicator via the written word. You can claim rhetoric applies to your profession until the cows come home, but we'll just add that to the litany of hilarious claims you attempt to make on a regular basis.

[Demon767]

lol 

[Vermillion_Hawk]

Actually, no.

Grammatically, you are hopelessly inept at utilizing proper punctuation and/or a funny little convention known as a conjunction. You abuse commas horrifically and mangle five to six different sentence subjects together without most of the minimal grammar concerns that would be necessary to sustain them. They end up being these weird, awkward and completely breathless tangents that just ramble on aimlessly like a homeless person suffering from alcohol withdrawl.

A run-on sentence can technically go on forever IF the writer is extremely competent at correctly using punctuation. You, on the other hand, construct your sentences atrociously.

So not only are you ineffective at making stylistic run-on sentences, you're also inept at the grammatical considerations that would make that attempt even remotely possible.

Simply speaking, you're a poor communicator via the written word. You can claim rhetoric applies to your profession until the cows come home, but we'll just add that to the litany of hilarious claims you attempt to make on a regular basis.

Do point out these various subjects I've mangled together for me. In addition, point out what grammatical considerations I may need to take in order to construct one properly. I'll breathlessly await what you, a negligible cretin, can find fault in in that which earns praise elsewhere.

[Mister Schmidt]

Man this is getting out of hand, I might have to lock it.

[EliteGren]

please chill and grab some popcorn. if this was a movie I'd pay to see it

[TheWindCriesMary]

I'll breathlessly await what you, a negligible cretin, can find fault in in that which earns praise elsewhere.

One day you're going to figure out that you're not a credible source for your own reviews.

If you want so much for people to believe you're intelligent, try acting with intelligence once in a while instead of spending so much time and effort trying (in vain) to convince people that they should take your word for it.

[Smokaz]

getting thrown on the defensive by a spelling flame? amateur

please chill and grab some popcorn. if this was a movie I'd pay to see it

Keanu Reeves startign as Vermillion Hawk

[Vermillion_Hawk]

One day you're going to figure out that you're not a credible source for your own reviews.

If you want so much for people to believe you're intelligent, try acting with intelligence once in a while instead of spending so much time and effort trying (in vain) to convince people that they should take your word for it.

I've yet to receive indispensable information on my grammatical wrongdoings, aside from the hollow, vague and ill-defined statements you've thus far made.