Allies stacking warmap!

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[8thRifleRegiment]

aye, 4v4s are just spamfests and clusterfucks. no strats at all, arty spam 4dayz

[TheWindCriesMary]

I must reclaim Belgium


WIND, TERROR OF BELGIUM, WHERE ART THOU

Just spanked some allied bois a few hours ago.

Don't think i'll be reliving the 28 games in a day madness of the Groundfire campaign though lol

[aeroblade56]

Chill brah, im a bad player and i rely on good players like morka and ray and soupnazi to carry me. as a result when i get stomped, when im alone i go super emo and realise how shit i am. true story ive been here for way to long and haven't gotten better. so sorry.

[EIRRMod]

Average - Good players, with well focused companies vs players who are still trying to make rank 9 companies.

Thats wa' I see folks.

[skaffa]

Anyways Smokaz they also refuse to play 2v2s...I hate whoever made bigger games worth more.  4v4s are the bane of eir and all strategy in general.   It's an embarresment to this community that everyone is playing 4v4s now to get more territory or points or whatever. 

+1

Interesting. It should be the other way around! 4vs4 are horrible. 2vs2 are the hardest and most strategic, most based on skill. In 3vs3 its often relying on other players. 2vs2s should really give the most points! Please fix.

[PonySlaystation]

I agree, 4v4s should not give so many points.

It should be like this:

1v1 - No amount of points (because 1v1 is for practice matches)
2v2 - Less amount of points (because fewer players are involved)
3v3 - Normal amount of points (because this is how EIR is meant to be played)
4v4 - Even less amount of points (because 4v4s are a joke)

[Nug]

2v2 - Less amount of points (because fewer players are involved)
3v3 - Normal amount of points (because this is how EIR is meant to be played)
4v4 - Even less amount of points (because 4v4s are a joke)

fail

[shockcoil]

I just joined axis. Storm is coming boys

[Evilnrg]

omw , but i'm at south moving north

[aeroblade56]

thats almost entirely  bs because in a 3v3 you might carry a new guy or a 4v4 in a 2v2 if new guy lets you down your totally fucked.

[Shabtajus]

some1 saw positive aeroblades post here?  I swear god its allways the same endless river of tears and complains... Can you just stfu and play a damn game. If you dont like players vs who you cant win just dont play vs them and stop your biased talks in forums about stacks

[UndeathWrath]

Lol what are you talking about

I played against you and kwia with a brand new guy in my team 2v2 even though i knew there was slim chance we would win. You barely beat us and cried so hard about defensive doctrine like you always do.

You stacked and won, what more do you want, you want me to put a diaper on you?

Follow your own advice.

[Shabtajus]

lol he was not new guy, and he did better than kwia and u haha, and i beated shit out of ur defensive coy lol, i was not crying just making fun of ur HARD micro sitting around 88 and giving 100 comands to ur team8 while u was just shooting 88s arty and losing any engament u tried to do haha

[Shabtajus]

and evry1 can play DINAMIC DEFNSIVE comapany u r running, med bunkers, 88s arty, and all inf in trench, watching at reload time 88 has and telling to team8 kill that, do that, do this, move here, dont go here, sad i have not saved chat log lol, and btw everytime u tried to leave trenches and 88s u was just loltastic to see how u micro and move ur units hehe, 0 micro and 01 game logic so go back to trenches comrade DINAMIC DEFENSIVE GENERAL

[JustCarnage]

Correct me if I'm wrong but 4v4s do not yield the greatest amount of points per player. The only reason why a 4v4 will yield 580 points for a single territory is if 1. all four players are targeting the same territory 2. The game is won with an overwhelming victory 3. Supported by a nearby sector. All three of these factors translates into 145 points per player.

Any variation in the number of players will yield the same potential amount of points per player (a max of 145, afaik). 2v2s and 3v3s have as much of a contribution as a 4v4 per player.

[hans]

some1 saw positive aeroblades post here?  I swear god its allways the same endless river of tears and complains... Can you just stfu and play a damn game. If you dont like players vs who you cant win just dont play vs them and stop your biased talks in forums about stacks

+2

[MorkaandBorka]

thats almost entirely  bs because in a 3v3 you might carry a new guy or a 4v4 in a 2v2 if new guy lets you down your totally fucked.

This is exactly why it show true skill though...Get a teammate and go play some other 2v2...it really shows how good you are. 

Also 3v3s are not what EIR is meant for.  I don't really see that at all actually. 

[aeroblade56]

okay well then i got shit skill that make you happy thats why i dont play 2v2s.

[Unkn0wn]

I would agree it's probably not a good idea to incentive 3vs3s or 4vs4s, simply because with a small player base that pretty much equals shooting yourself in the foot. (I.e players will have to wait even longer to get games because people insist on 4vs4s) Instead of game size, skill difference between opponents should affect the total amount of points on the warmap, i.e less for stomps and much more for +- equal teams.