nikomas
Shameless Perv
 Posts: 4286
|
|
« on: July 02, 2012, 02:32:10 pm » |
|
Never have I seen a doctrine get so supply capped in just about everything... Is it really supposed to be that way?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets. |
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2012, 02:55:09 pm » |
|
no, but devs love axis so AB and mandos get no attention and love like they need.
but seriously, building a fun mando company means you're gonna have resources left over. Its ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
| jackmccrack
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2012, 03:51:03 pm » |
|
Nikomas, I am having the same problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
 Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2012, 04:01:52 pm » |
|
what do you mean supply capped?. building a commando company that is actually balanced with mandos is frustrating.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
| jackmccrack
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2012, 04:03:19 pm » |
|
By supply capped, I think he means everything is in the negatives and reserves are at zero.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| pqumsieh
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2012, 04:43:35 pm » |
|
I agree, we need to increase the armor and vehicle pool slightly
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Common sense is not so common after all.
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2012, 05:06:01 pm » |
|
Every doctrine has the same overall supply. So increasing one pool decreases another. If you tell us what your building we can examine unit pool values
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
| pqumsieh
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2012, 05:30:22 pm » |
|
In that case, increasing one pool at the cost of another will affect some players positively and others negatively. Tough call on what to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2012, 05:49:42 pm » |
|
A lot of units, light vehicles especially are flat 9 pool. So when you compare a tet and a stag for 9 pool, the tet sucks. A lot of lv's could be tweaked in pool
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2012, 06:01:40 pm » |
|
Tbh, you can empty the support pool for all I care... I dont wanna meet the man who needs a support pool of 54 when playing mandoes...
Then again, maybe I play it odd, but I'd swap the vehicle and support pools as mandoes rely more on infantry and vehicle at anyway with it's doctrine unlocks oriented that way.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 02, 2012, 06:44:08 pm » |
|
agree 100% with nikomas
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2012, 07:19:04 pm » |
|
i dont see the problem with enabling allied support spam, because they dont have as varied long range AT, and they dont have the best snipers, and they dont have the best mortars
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 02, 2012, 07:22:41 pm » |
|
i dont see the problem with enabling allied support spam, because they dont have as varied long range AT, and they don't have the best snipers, and they dont have the best mortars
It's not a problem at all, the problem is that their high support pool shoots the vehicle and armor pools in the leg, any way you slice it it's almost impossible to spend all your fuel, you only have enough vehicle pool for 6 jeeps and 2 tets for example. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| pqumsieh
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2012, 07:30:49 pm » |
|
Yeah, I'm finding myself left with a lot of fuel as well. We likely need to review the pool costs and or the commando pool balance in general.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EIRRMod
Administrator / Lead Developer
 Posts: 11009
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2012, 07:40:18 pm » |
|
no, but devs love axis so AB and mandos get no attention and love like they need.
but seriously, building a fun mando company means you're gonna have resources left over. Its ridiculous.
Wait what? You know Im an Allied fanboi right? The *LEAD DEV* is an Allied fanboi, and you pulled out the 'Devs love axis' card? Pfff.... Whatevs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shit I'm pretty sure you could offer the guy a cup of coffee and he'd try to kill you with the mug if you forgot sugar.
That's like offering Beer to fuck the fat chick. It will work for a while, but it's not gonna last. Not only that, but there is zero motivation for the Fat chick to loose weight.
Why don't you collect up your love beads and potpourri and find something constructive to do.
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 02, 2012, 08:16:04 pm » |
|
heh I thought you'd enjoy that
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2012, 08:43:35 pm » |
|
heh I thought you'd be annoyed by that
Fixed. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
 Posts: 6294
|
|
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2013, 03:01:56 pm » |
|
The B-Team really should look into this, it really is imposseble to have a balanced Brit coy while still using all the fule while not spamming Light vehicles so cut the supply pool a little because it is wayyy to big for the commando doc, it would be acceptable if the captain and the leu were support pool instead of infantry but regardless its too big.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 26, 2013, 03:08:23 pm by TheIcelandicManiac »
|
Logged
|
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.
Work Harder |
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #18 on: February 27, 2013, 09:15:47 am » |
|
yes, the support pool needs drastically reduced for mandos
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
