Nug
|
|
« on: July 05, 2012, 12:08:35 pm » |
|
lol panther 24 pool, someone put in wrong price  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| hans
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2012, 12:09:09 pm » |
|
no its true big nerf was incoming  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
|
|
|
| Nug
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2012, 12:10:10 pm » |
|
so why it's not in the patch notes?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
 Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2012, 12:11:13 pm » |
|
it was a dudebro Balance decision
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2012, 12:15:01 pm » |
|
nice
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
 Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2012, 12:22:43 pm » |
|
yea, just forgot to put it in the patchnotes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
3rdCondor
Donator
 Posts: 1536
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2012, 12:27:43 pm » |
|
Pool Cost is too damn high  Should be raised, but shouldn't cost the same as a tiger. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2012, 12:47:28 pm » |
|
Lul at Panther Double nerf.
Inf acc reduce and massive pool increase.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2012, 01:07:38 pm » |
|
CLEARLY this is a sign dont abuse shit  next rca. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2012, 02:34:07 pm » |
|
this is more than likely in response to the ridiculous amount of panthers fielded lately.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2012, 03:13:54 pm » |
|
this is more than likely in response to the ridiculous amount of panthers fielded lately.
Yes, nerf a good unit to force people to choose the weaker alternative. Great idea Now we'll DEFINANTLY see more P4s and StuGs and tigers on the field! |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 05, 2012, 03:39:09 pm by NightRain »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| hans
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2012, 03:37:15 pm » |
|
seems legit
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| I2ay
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2012, 03:41:45 pm » |
|
Isn't nerfing a unit thats so good the alternatives seem like shit so that all the options seem viable the point of balance patching...?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Malgoroth
Donator
Posts: 960
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 05, 2012, 04:04:26 pm » |
|
The alternatives WERE shit. Panther was the best investment armor-wise to deal with mass allied vehicles. The double nerf is stupid. I never understood what's so bad about one or the other. Is it really so hard to nerf it once and then nerf it again at a later time if the first fix wasn't enough?
Mass pak spam awaits you. Then you'll whine to nerf that too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 8thRifleRegiment
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 05, 2012, 04:08:09 pm » |
|
/remove panthers from company
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I will never forget the rage we enduced together  Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
|
|
|
| Poppi
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2012, 04:10:47 pm » |
|
couldnt they just limit it to 2 max?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2012, 04:25:42 pm » |
|
i think we see more g-wagons, stugs, 50mm puma's and p4s, for wm and more marders, 50mm hts (which i don't see much of anymore...post on that next now that it makes me think) and hetzer spam will return.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| SophiaT1991
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2012, 04:28:01 pm » |
|
Isnt the massive amount of panthers we've seen more down to the warmap resource bonuses rather then their pool value?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2012, 04:33:35 pm » |
|
Isnt the massive amount of panthers we've seen more down to the warmap resource bonuses rather then their pool value?
its because of it's cheaper price compared to what it used to be (550 to 450 now) It is the best all around tank in the game. It could snipe infantry, has long range, very good gun damage, good armor and good speed. If any allied tank got caught in a 1v1 with a panther without support, other than a Pershing, it's done. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2012, 05:23:07 pm » |
|
its because of it's cheaper price compared to what it used to be (550 to 450 now)
It is the best all around tank in the game. It could snipe infantry, has long range, very good gun damage, good armor and good speed. If any allied tank got caught in a 1v1 with a panther without support, other than a Pershing, it's done.
How the heck is that a valid argument when the only allied tank that is comparable in price IS the pershing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets. |
|
|
|
