ALLiDOisWIN
|
|
« on: July 08, 2012, 02:53:04 pm » |
|
Just wondering if maybe we could get x2 zooks for armor or somethin, since x1 zook is kinda shit
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2012, 02:59:55 pm » |
|
1 zook being shit does not give enough of a reason to give 2. Any more specific reason why they would need 2?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
 Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2012, 03:04:18 pm » |
|
Play as PE and have to fight 1 Zook rifle swarms...
It's bad enough that the Ranger is the new 'Can Do' unit now. Dual Zooks, close in Thompsons and LMg's that are better then 42's
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
| ALLiDOisWIN
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2012, 03:11:29 pm » |
|
Well put the pool high for double zooks and have the munitons at 90 or something. I was wondering because i love playing armor with pershings. My blitz company has tigers and stormies with shrecks. I was hoping to make it so i could use zooks and pershings because its close to the same thing. Just a thought
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
 Posts: 1447
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2012, 04:15:47 pm » |
|
But your argumentation looks like "It would be nice to have this" and does not look like "Okay let's talk guys I pointed out that that top T2 unlock need to be changed because...".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 9th Armoured Engineers |
|
|
| ALLiDOisWIN
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2012, 04:48:18 pm » |
|
Well we should change them so that way you cant spam them?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 8thRifleRegiment
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2012, 04:52:08 pm » |
|
You argue for and against your own thread on the same page? i like it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I will never forget the rage we enduced together  Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2012, 07:40:28 pm » |
|
Oh please, sit a Infantry halftrack away from a rifle squad and a 6 zook team wouldn't scratch it, they would be pinned and then dead way before.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2012, 09:12:13 pm » |
|
Yep, also Riflemen don't have fire up. Also in armor bazookas can not get officer and doctrine buffs that give them significant accuracy, damage and penetration.
I think it's a good idea, armor is the only doctrine in EIR that doesn't have access to hand-held AT.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2012, 09:21:19 pm » |
|
I think it's a good idea, armor is the only doctrine in EIR that doesn't have access to hand-held AT.
proof this guy didn't really read the thread. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
Malgoroth
Donator
Posts: 960
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2012, 09:26:56 pm » |
|
I miss having riflemen with 2 AT rifles. I remember them doing really well against PE. It was good light AT to protect your army from swarms of LVs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 8thRifleRegiment
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2012, 09:29:23 pm » |
|
proof this guy didn't really read the thread.
he doesnt even read the doctrine. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
3rdCondor
Donator
Posts: 1536
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2012, 09:36:05 pm » |
|
I like shooting at them with tigers.
<backs away slowly>
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2012, 10:09:39 pm » |
|
I mean hand-held AT that isn't completely fucking useless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2012, 10:11:15 pm » |
|
any more then 1 zook is op with armor
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
| spinn72
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2012, 04:26:36 am » |
|
YES PLEASE.
If there were 2x zook riflemen, I'd play again.
Run a company full of riflemen (blanks and zooks) and M10's.. Ultimate troll company.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2012, 05:00:44 am » |
|
well,you also have m18,which seems to be the OP now...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2012, 09:19:18 am » |
|
i preferred the 2x boys AT myself.
the single zook sucks, i tried using it, the only way it's useful is if you put them in HTs, a single zook isn't a deterrent from having a tank circle your atg.
i cant imagine the laughing stock it would be trying to hit pumas (unless you're in a building) with a single rifle zook.
I do see how 2x zooks could possible be OP, but I don't think it would be so OP that it's not worth at least trying.
but honestly, just give me back 2x boys AT please!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 09, 2012, 09:21:40 am » |
|
With pool costs on upgrades I could easily see double zooks work out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 09, 2012, 12:26:04 pm » |
|
Shitty accuracy. i donmt know what the stats are compared to the schrek. but 2x would be nice because even my TR zook coy i can have 6 zooks and only 1 hit a marder. its like shooting a shotgun
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
|
