Roll over allies, roll over

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[salan]

Let the fools win already, this war will be so much more functionally fun for all the new people if we could just reset it !!

end the war, either push the germans back or roll it over and let em into england !

[Thtb-Ally]

At this rate 2.0 will be out in 9 days max.

[Steinmarder]

hm yes, a reset would really be a good idea, IMO

I guess we could also see some balance issues clearer, if there are any left, as most of the long-timers have T4s in at least 1 company and loads of vet units now again (i have 2 T4 companys)

--

I dont think they have 2.0 finished to release and just "wait for the war to end" 

[salan]

At this rate 2.0 will be out in 9 days max.

why do you people constantly think we are going to get 2.0 with the end to this war?  I dunno, maybe i believe i am just more realistic in my thought process...  I don't see 2.0 being ready, I am more thinking this current situation needs a fresh start...  its changed to much, we have had the community MORE then double...  its time to start over, even if its still 1.9

[Thtb-Ally]

Cause they said it will be done then

And thats why the axis got a buff and the allys a nerf - to enlarge the duration of the war. Territory increasing didnt do the trick. Now we just have to role over and play dead to get a über-buff for the ally´s.

[salan]

Cause they said it will be done then

And thats why the axis got a buff and the allys a nerf - to enlarge the duration of the war. Territory increasing didnt do the trick. Now we just have to role over and play dead to get a über-buff for the ally´s.

i won more games as allies yesterday then axis , dunno what your talking about

[Ucross]

I'm the same. ^^

Some people make a lot of assumptions based on poor evidence.

[Unkn0wn]

Too bad my on board mechanics is shit now :/.

[Akvud]

So, when does the axis get wtfnerfed? 250 territories ?

[CatinHat]

new start would be fun

[Thtb-Ally]

I'm the same. ^^

Some people make a lot of assumptions based on poor evidence.

My evidence is this:

^(The territorys)^


[attachment deleted by admin]

[Ucross]

That's just natural when only one side is attacking.  You have to interpret the evidence correctly

[Thtb-Ally]

Axis capturing territory 276% faster than before the "balance" buff?

[salan]

more population with more games being played with more newer players, with most of the experienced players (exageration potential) aligning on axis side... means more territory will swap hands when they fight new players!

[Dr.Nick]

The way I look towards Ucross's balancing. When volks were so dirt cheap that you could have 60 of them with fausts he simply raised Volks prices by 50-60 MP. But when someone finds a way to get lots of airborne he quad nerfs them. I see the consistancy.

[CatinHat]

can we kinda have this this mod based on real life in World War 2. King Tigers where really not in the war so it shouldn't be in the war, Tigers where few, panthers there was good amount but cost more and masses of the panzer 4 was far greater, There was 20 some Pershing in WW2, Shermans where in great numbers but should be equal to the Pz. IV.

[Thtb-Ally]

Avaliblity did that.
I miss it.

[Bonte]

pershing was rarer than king tiger, tiger can 1 shot tank from half map, allies get 8 shermans for every tiger

[Dr.Nick]

Just turn availability back on and revert the patch changes except for airborne cost increases, you can keep that, but at least bump airiel brothers back up to 30%, hard to compete with other Tier 4's otherwise. Bump airborne up in cost for all I care though.

[Ciwawa]

pershing was never used in action during ww2