RikiRude
Donator
 Posts: 4376
|
|
« on: June 01, 2008, 06:32:38 pm » |
|
Gayest game I've ever played. Got rushed by quads and M-10s, and was continually hit by... more M-10s and quads and flame engs.
Battle#3471
If this isn't spam I don't know what is. When you can pretty much suicide every M-10 and I still run out of AT to defend against it, that's spam. I think I may have a black list started.
[attachment deleted by admin]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
| TodlichPanther
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2008, 06:35:33 pm » |
|
paks and shreks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Also, I lost a game due to not enough anti-infantry units, so airborne get double damage at each vet level.
More changes to come.
|
|
|
| PPLA
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2008, 06:58:48 pm » |
|
Yeah well if the tactic worked then why not..... just put more AT into your company
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2008, 07:21:44 pm » |
|
My AT was an 88 that I never would of had a moments chance to field. I guess 3 schrecks, 2 AT guns and 4 stugs, isn't enough AT?
Anyways, Tod how did you and natedog fair against them?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2008, 07:23:15 pm » |
|
For that kind of spam you need at least 2 PAKs on field + a p4 or something to act as a mobile hardpoint.
Or a couple Panthers.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
| PPLA
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2008, 07:32:50 pm » |
|
My AT was an 88 that I never would of had a moments chance to field. I guess 3 schrecks, 2 AT guns and 4 stugs, isn't enough AT?
Well u lost so i guess it wasnt enough AT but i do have to agree with u that kind of "spaming" can ruin the game |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2008, 11:36:11 pm » |
|
I spoke with Tod and nate who fought them after I did and gave them a warning, they said they destroyed all the armor they sent out, but lost due to MCP. Too bad they didn't save their replay so I could see what to do!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| LordMalgoroth
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2008, 01:41:19 am » |
|
Fucking oath. Me and Willshire went up against M10, Quad, and M8 spam earlier. 21 vehicle kills between us. To exacerbate things, they had a Calliope as well! Thank fucking Christ it was only ONE of them spamming that shit. A serious pain in the ass to say the least.
Paks totally won it though. And volks to recrew the paks when they get decrewed. And luck falling out of your ass.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| LordMalgoroth
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2008, 01:41:44 am » |
|
Umm... tell me how and I'll post the replay.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Clock
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2008, 01:56:02 am » |
|
Allies spam because they can't beat axis with skills they do not have. There are few players who dont spam on allies side, and i respect those guys, I am happy if they beat me because it is a fair game and they fought better than me. Just yesterday I went up against a 12 snipers spam , and two days ago a m8/quad spam. The problem is that there are no rules against rush or spam, and it will be pointless to forbid you have more than x units on the field. Just don't play with those noobs or play and be sure to own them.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18377
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2008, 02:22:57 am » |
|
Just spam stugs.
The joys of having no availability!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Baasje
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2008, 07:05:14 am » |
|
First I would like to say that KptNachbar and I are no noobs. I'm a lvl 8 player across the board in vCOH 1v1, and we have played many 2v2AT games together in the beta and are now lvl 7 as a team.
Now the spam we do is only effective if the allies are on the defending side, this is the case because then we can lose many units without losing much territory because we keep the pressure on constantly so they can't cap any territory.
This is what my company consists of:
Squads in company:
Unit #
Allied HMG 2
Allied Mortar 2
Engineers 5
Halftrack 6
Jeep 3
M10 7
Riflemen 21
My teammate has more half tracks and jeeps, but you get the picture. This tactic works best if both players go armor company, but i guess you have figured that out by now. We have played this strat because we don't like defending, as in the mortar battles and laying wire across the map.
Replay vs Nated0g and Puddln(Todlichpanther) Battle #3498
[attachment deleted by admin]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18377
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2008, 07:15:49 am » |
|
Looks like a pretty balanced company to me, the only 'extraordinary' aspect of your company is the high amount of M10s, which is not even that big of a deal. (And axis player can get up to 10 Stugs)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PPLAaxis
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2008, 07:18:00 am » |
|
Spaming is just a tactic like any other. Both axis and allies have spam unit and you just have to adjust to play against spammers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Sach
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2008, 08:24:02 am » |
|
An early Panther/KT/Tiger from one of the axis would surely cause big problems?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sach Wins!  Would people please stop killing my AVREs. Not cool.
|
|
|
| GamerAndy
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2008, 08:35:03 am » |
|
Early tigers/KTs i havn't found to be very effective, they're just too much pop-cap even in larger games for the early game to handle, you just end up wasting your time unless you're comfortable using it to spearhead a push and almost certainly lose it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Sach
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 02, 2008, 08:37:40 am » |
|
Yes i certainly wouldn't recommend it usually but in the specific context of the above it would seem an obvious choice from 1 of the players.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Baasje
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 02, 2008, 08:45:19 am » |
|
Only a dual panther start would cause real problems, because the tigers can't stand up to m10's because of the slow turret traversal speed. Besides that, you can't cap with tanks, so we would still have a territory advantage. In the long run we would lose most of our m10's but two dead panthers are, correct me if I'm wrong, about equal to 6 dead m10's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18377
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 02, 2008, 08:57:32 am » |
|
PAK + Schreck = bye bye m10. Seriously, there's so many easy ways to beat M10s, the only thing they're good at anyway is, surprise surprise, killing tanks & vehicles.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Thirteen
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2008, 06:55:57 am » |
|
Fausts hurt M10s big time no problem buddy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
