*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 04, 2024, 06:58:36 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The No F*ing Way Game  (Read 6775 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
notenome Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 51


« Reply #20 on: January 14, 2009, 12:06:19 pm »

True, but we are all forgetting that they werent doing inf only, they also spammed m10s and 2 crocs. Again no one is accusing anyone of anything, it was a very strange game and we're trying to understand how the hell did this happen.
Logged
Deterrence Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 11


« Reply #21 on: January 14, 2009, 12:38:18 pm »

The 88s were my howitzer substitute..but cmon howitzers are far from game changing unless your playing turtles.   But as far as the losses thing, yes its quite common for allies to have many more losses even when winning.
Logged
Spitfire92 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 64


« Reply #22 on: January 16, 2009, 06:24:18 pm »

Maybe alot of the axis players have too much AT is because all any allied player (Aside from this game or w/e) plays is armored, and it's so easy to overrun paks. I played a game against 3 other armored players, and I dont even know why I bothered calling in any infantry at all. Wish I could've goten more paks.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.041 seconds with 36 queries.