Things for next patch.

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Tymathee]

piat commando's need a serious price nerf, ditto mortar and hmg, for their usefulness and the price vs other units of the same type, they're just too expensive.

[EscforrealityTLS]

Punishment for people dropping in games. I got a draw instead of a loss yesterday because my team mate dropped near the end. We where soundly beaten and the enemy didn't get there win for it. That's balls. My team mate was doing nothing malicious just leaving.

People should be encouraged to stay in games to the end, If you leave before the game end you WILL get a loss.

[Khorney]

less PP for draws than losses? because theres no legimate way to draw a game is there?

[Hicks359]

I'd like to see the Piat Commandos scrapped all together and have the Piats as an upgrade for the standard Commandos.

That or a downprice on the Piat Commandos and a slight health increase on the normal Commandos to make them feel like they are actually worth the somewhat huge investment.

Wouldnt mind the launcher having the lag reduced so the thing doesnt chop up your sentences... Type fast enough and it fails to remember the order in which you have typed somehow, so you get a choppy sentence, sometimes to funny results.

[EIRRMod]

Draws will begin to give no PP rewards after a certain point.

Its not in yet, but will be soon.
So you have been warned - high draw rates will punish you. (And the players you are with =/)

[Killer344]

Draws will begin to give no PP rewards after a certain point.

Its not in yet, but will be soon.
So you have been warned - high draw rates will punish you. (And the players you are with =/)

yay.... wait .... what?


Punish the victims? lol...

[scrapking]

Draws will begin to give no PP rewards after a certain point.

Its not in yet, but will be soon.
So you have been warned - high draw rates will punish you. (And the players you are with =/)

It would be a better result ultimately if there simply were no draws. 

Is it possible to either 1) Let the game continue on when it does not desynch or 2) When it does desynch, award a loss to the team whose player desynched first?

[EscforrealityTLS]

I would have though giving a Loss to the guy that dropped and letting the game play out normally would be a better Idea.

Besides people with a shit load of wins and draws but fuck all losses, well its pretty obvious what's happening there.

[gamesguy1]

I would have though giving a Loss to the guy that dropped and letting the game play out normally would be a better Idea.

Besides people with a shit load of wins and draws but fuck all losses, well its pretty obvious what's happening there.

Or they could, you know, be actually good and hardly ever lose, so all those draws are from games they would've won.

[EscforrealityTLS]

Just mentioned this in a different thread:

What might be useful in the Control panel is if the mouse scrolls over something a little description pops up.

For example:

Scrolling over "Create" with the mouse would say "Clicking create, will make a game for others to join, you will be able to decide game size and battle type."

Scrolling over "Join" with the mouse would say "This will allow you to join the game you have currently selected provided there is space for you faction."

And so on.

[Groundfire]

Does anyone else want the new vet list in? Cause that would be just fine with me.

[Malevolence]

Different team members do the unit balances than the former requests.

And, unit balance is the whole POINT to this stage - until its closer to a correct balance, you wont see the other bits implemented (even if they are in the launcher, just disabled)

Well the way I see it, wouldn't balancing the units around the massive gameplay concepts that are resource bonuses, doctrinal unlocks, and newb advantages make more sense than balancing the units... then re-balancing them again once the bonuses and unlocks are released? I mean, it's balance them once against balance them twice - balancing them once seems like a lot less work.

I guess it's up to you guys, though

[Unkn0wn]

The idea is that you balance each stage accordingly so that your end product will be better balanced.
In a scenario in which you try to balance the game with doctrines, vet, advantages and pricing right off the bat, its much harder to identify certain balance issues. Is it the vet that is causing the imbalance? Is it the doctrine abilities affecting these units? Or is it simply the unit's price that is incorrect?

Therefore its important that first you strike somewhat of a balance with just unit pricing and veterancy, before adding in doctrines and eventually advantages. Simply adding up 3 balanced 'parts' followed by minor finetuning is easier than starting off with the parts added together to then try and balance them.

[Lt_Apollo]

maby my idea for purchasable sprint on PE assualt grens?
http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=8493.msg148980;topicseen#new

[Duvka]

Teller mines should trigger when ATG's step over them.
Like in vCoH.