Units with insanely stupid veterancy requirements that need to be lowered

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Malevolence]

Pretty sure that's a PIV F, but nitpick aside, plus TWENTY range by vet 3 may be a tad... much. Maybe +5 for vet 2 and +10 for vet 3, that'd be pretty good.

Also if it got an insane-o penetration buff that'd be pretty cool (PIV IST with like a 25% chance to penetrate frontal sherman at vet 3 would be interesting to say the least - lockdown and let them have at it xD)

Whoops I was OT. Sorry Smokaz

[MannfredvonRitter]

PzIVE is the snub nosed.

The F1/F2 are the longer barelled variants and once you add skirts you have a PzIVH

IvE:


Attachment: http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=489116
IvF2:


Attachment: http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=489117
IvH:


Attachment: http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=489118

[Malevolence]

The F1 was still a stubby.

[salan]

Good to know Salan's working on it. Though, I thought PzJ was the one who was working the vet tables last I remember?

he was submitting a proposal which I have taken and tailored to EIR:Rs needs.  More customizing and what not.
A lot of it was redone, but at the same time a lot of it was still adhered to, like the kits he produced for cover and assault which were great additions!

[jackmccrack]

Pershings should be added to the list. 500xp for 1.2 Damage

[salan]

Pershings should be added to the list. 500xp for 1.2 Damage

thats a very old and out of date list, which we are currently on.. It will be replaced soon!