Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 28, 2024, 02:09:27 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 0
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 5
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
INFantry and the numbers game.
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: INFantry and the numbers game. (Read 5498 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
griggc
EIR Regular
Posts: 6
INFantry and the numbers game.
«
on:
May 14, 2009, 02:52:15 pm »
>>>>>Rant<<<<<
Allie's squad size seems to allways be larger for the allies. Hmm.... We all know there is an Allied bias in the game. (note. Some beg to differ, but hear me out). With INF blobbers it tends to and allied issue. You know why? AXIS INFANTRY... Come on. AXIS have no way to keep up, every AXIS squad is under manned. I'm not going to talk historical issue here. I want to talk Balance and FUN. I'm tired of the Ranger SPAM.. I dont want it to go away. I want to give a fair advantage to both sides. Since i mentioned Rangers.. 6 man squad unlimited anti-tank( bazookas, Tommy) Nothing can stand up to it. Its squad size makes it very survivalable especially with " Fire-UP" Axis on the other side of the coin... Knights cross 3 man squad. 1 use of anti-tank.
Yes i know of faction diffrences.. but hey. i could go on.. and on.. and on... since i dont like to bitch with out giveing a solution and yes one of the reasons i like playing EIR is becouse when i first started the squad size for rifleman were 5... To me this showed promise and someone was consideing this to be an issue... well that being said. SQUAD SIZE LETS MEASURE UP...
Logged
wildsolus
Donator
Posts: 807
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #1 on:
May 14, 2009, 02:54:50 pm »
allies have superior units which is why it has the highest turnover of players right?
axis infantry is specialized. they are smaller but pack a much harder punch for the most part.
Logged
lol
lol x2
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #2 on:
May 14, 2009, 02:56:49 pm »
Far as i know Allied squads never changed size, it was the the number representing it's size that changed so it could still be 5 population. but pretty sure they were always 6 guys in a squad. I agree rangers are beastly. I had a squad of enemy rangers run into my two gren squads of 2XLMG and the rangers won, granted my stupid guys kept trying to get closer.
And Tym, while it is the same gun, the HMG version of the MG42 has an SF kit which allows it to fire more accurately over a greater range.-thats the difference
«
Last Edit: May 14, 2009, 03:00:51 pm by brn4meplz
»
Logged
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint
Quote from: Unkn0wn on July 31, 2012, 03:50:15 am
Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!
Quote from: Bear on June 19, 2013, 01:24:59 pm
the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #3 on:
May 14, 2009, 02:58:11 pm »
Allied infantry may have more men per squad, but have less health per man than axis infantry. Ranger's lose their AT capability if they have smg's when they lose two players, doesn't happen with scheck teams.
KCH have nearly 100 health, i think its like 90, and they're short range units. use an hmg or lmg with a kch squad backing up and they're nasty.
Thats the whole CoH game mechanic, allied size has more men per squad but less health, and axis have less men but more health and more punch to their weapons. The axis have better weapons overalla. I'll take your lmg's with 4 m en over my bar's with 6 men. It's like having mobile hmgs, oh wait, they are, they're the same gun and they're just carrying it around.
Logged
Quote from: nikomas on October 04, 2012, 09:26:33 pm
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Mgallun74
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1478
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #4 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:13:26 pm »
Quote from: griggc on May 14, 2009, 02:52:15 pm
>>>>>Rant<<<<<
Allie's squad size seems to allways be larger for the allies. Hmm.... We all know there is an Allied bias in the game. (note. Some beg to differ, but hear me out). With INF blobbers it tends to and allied issue. You know why? AXIS INFANTRY... Come on. AXIS have no way to keep up, every AXIS squad is under manned. I'm not going to talk historical issue here. I want to talk Balance and FUN. I'm tired of the Ranger SPAM.. I dont want it to go away. I want to give a fair advantage to both sides. Since i mentioned Rangers.. 6 man squad unlimited anti-tank( bazookas, Tommy) Nothing can stand up to it. Its squad size makes it very survivalable especially with " Fire-UP" Axis on the other side of the coin... Knights cross 3 man squad. 1 use of anti-tank.
Yes i know of faction diffrences.. but hey. i could go on.. and on.. and on... since i dont like to bitch with out giveing a solution and yes one of the reasons i like playing EIR is becouse when i first started the squad size for rifleman were 5... To me this showed promise and someone was consideing this to be an issue... well that being said. SQUAD SIZE LETS MEASURE UP...
lol.. play much?
anyways, i have 4 sets of Rangers, all are Vet 2, but, they aint all that, you have to pick and choose your engagements... they burn really nice from pios with flamers, i tend to avoid them with my rangers.. mg42 Grens can eat them up nicely too... KCH hold their own very well for only be 3 dudes, i cant count how many times i have seen blobs of 3 or so KCH just run thru a .30 HMG fire without flinching, my rangers dont do that lol. Even volks with mp40s can be very hard to deal with if.. i have had a ranger squad with tommys fight a volks mp40 squad many times, and well, not exactly a easy win. heck last night i had a game, where it was towards the end of game and brought 3 rangers squads on, the axis player came on with maybe 2 mg42 grens, maybe volks with mp40s and some regular rifle and well, i didnt exactly own them, i got beat...
Rifleman with Bars are ok, but mg42 grens again own them, if i can get the suppress in time they work well, suppress and Grenande the dudes on the ground, but that doesnt always work, and rifleman die like flies being swat at with a fly swatter...
ya, so ok.
Logged
griggc
EIR Regular
Posts: 6
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #5 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:14:13 pm »
FACTION SQUAD SIZE PROPOSED SIZE NOTES
AMERICAN
AM ENGINEERS 3 4 THIS INCREASE IS TO MATCH BRITTISH ENGINEERS
AM RIFLEMAN 5 5 ALL GOOD 2 BAR option
AM AIRBOURNE 6 6 2 recoiless and fireup anti-tank heavy unlimited use
AM RANGERS 6 6 Close combat medium 2 bazooks antitank unlimited use
BRITTISH
BRT Engineers 4 4 common use piat
BRT Rifleman 5 5 BREN, or rifle Gren
Commandos 6 6 Close combat
Commandos Piat 3 6 Anti-tank
Weheirmacht
WE Pioneers 2 4 Match alleid force
WE VOLKS 5 5 Option MP40
Panzer gren 4 5 Match Rifleman 2shrek 2 LMG option
KNIGHTS CROSS 3 6 match Ranges note 1 use of panzer faust
panzer ELEITE
GRENADERS 3 5* sAquad up to total 5
MP44 Gren 3 5* squad up to total 5shrek gre 3 5* squad up to total 5
Logged
Mgallun74
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1478
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #6 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:20:01 pm »
Quote from: griggc on May 14, 2009, 03:14:13 pm
FACTION SQUAD SIZE PROPOSED SIZE NOTES
AMERICAN
AM ENGINEERS 3 4 THIS INCREASE IS TO MATCH BRITTISH ENGINEERS
AM RIFLEMAN 5 5 ALL GOOD 2 BAR option
AM AIRBOURNE 6 6 2 recoiless and fireup anti-tank heavy unlimited use
AM RANGERS 6 6 Close combat medium 2 bazooks antitank unlimited use
BRITTISH
BRT Engineers 4 4 common use piat
BRT Rifleman 5 5 BREN, or rifle Gren
Commandos 6 6 Close combat
Commandos Piat 3 6 Anti-tank
Weheirmacht
WE Pioneers 2 4 Match alleid force
WE VOLKS 5 5 Option MP40
Panzer gren 4 5 Match Rifleman 2shrek 2 LMG option
KNIGHTS CROSS 3 6 match Ranges note 1 use of panzer faust
panzer ELEITE
GRENADERS 3 5* sAquad up to total 5
MP44 Gren 3 5* squad up to total 5shrek gre 3 5* squad up to total 5
Meh, Airborne dont get any cool guns like say a fg42... American airborne is cool with RR, but you have to be a micro king and know what your doing, same with rangers without thompson, kch, mp40s, mp44s etc will eat them alive..
which, leads me to one of my biggest complaints of game, the ROF of the Carbine and Garand on standard us infantry... ugggh.
Logged
griggc
EIR Regular
Posts: 6
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #7 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:20:45 pm »
PANZER 1337
FACTION size proposed size notes
GRenadiers 3 3/5* * pay for 2 addition soilders 5 total
MP44 Gren 3 3/5* * pay for 2 additional soilders 5total
shrek Gren 3 4/6* * pay for 2 additional soilders 6total
Lauffael 5 5 option for MP40 5 total
Fallahemgaer 4 6 match ranger adds survivablity
Logged
Mgallun74
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1478
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #8 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:23:08 pm »
Quote from: griggc on May 14, 2009, 03:20:45 pm
PANZER 1337
FACTION size proposed size notes
GRenadiers 3 3/5* * pay for 2 addition soilders 5 total
MP44 Gren 3 3/5* * pay for 2 additional soilders 5total
shrek Gren 3 4/6* * pay for 2 additional soilders 6total
Lauffael 5 5 option for MP40 5 total
Fallahemgaer 4 6 match ranger adds survivablity
mp44 Gren and Falls with FG42 can eat rangers for lunch if played wrong... simply thing is, rangers are not simply point and click i win dudes...
Logged
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #9 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:23:24 pm »
Quote
We all know there is an Allied bias in the game.
Wait what?
We have a tradition in this mod not to touch too many vCOH stats, that includes messing with stat changes. Axis squads are smaller in size but usually tougher per man so I don't understand why you'd want us to change that..
Logged
Jazlizard
EIR Veteran
Posts: 691
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #10 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:37:51 pm »
Quote from: Unkn0wn on May 14, 2009, 03:23:24 pm
Quote
We all know there is an Allied bias in the game.
Wait what?
We have a tradition in this mod not to touch too many vCOH stats, that includes messing with stat changes. Axis squads are smaller in size but usually tougher per man so I don't understand why you'd want us to change that..
It's obvious, he plays axis
Logged
Quote from: Phil
The MOD is over. The war is over. We're too lazy to restart it. You can all go fuck pickles mom, I hear she's easy.
griggc
EIR Regular
Posts: 6
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #11 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:43:18 pm »
NO WORRIES I LIKE PLAYING >>> its was only an opinion.
Logged
BigDick
Guest
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #12 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:47:09 pm »
Quote from: Mgallun74 on May 14, 2009, 03:23:08 pm
Quote from: griggc on May 14, 2009, 03:20:45 pm
PANZER 1337
FACTION size proposed size notes
GRenadiers 3 3/5* * pay for 2 addition soilders 5 total
MP44 Gren 3 3/5* * pay for 2 additional soilders 5total
shrek Gren 3 4/6* * pay for 2 additional soilders 6total
Lauffael 5 5 option for MP40 5 total
Fallahemgaer 4 6 match ranger adds survivablity
mp44 Gren and Falls with FG42 can eat rangers for lunch if played wrong... simply thing is, rangers are not simply point and click i win dudes...
i don't think so...ok maybe if you charge a rangersquad without thomson and fireup along a road (red cover) against a mp44 pzgren squad in green cover than maybe than they would loose...
otherwise... 165healthpoints (soldier armor) VS 390healthpopints (elite armor)
is very obviously....rangers would probably win even without a thomson
Logged
Mgallun74
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1478
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #13 on:
May 14, 2009, 03:49:23 pm »
Quote from: BigDick on May 14, 2009, 03:47:09 pm
Quote from: Mgallun74 on May 14, 2009, 03:23:08 pm
Quote from: griggc on May 14, 2009, 03:20:45 pm
PANZER 1337
FACTION size proposed size notes
GRenadiers 3 3/5* * pay for 2 addition soilders 5 total
MP44 Gren 3 3/5* * pay for 2 additional soilders 5total
shrek Gren 3 4/6* * pay for 2 additional soilders 6total
Lauffael 5 5 option for MP40 5 total
Fallahemgaer 4 6 match ranger adds survivablity
mp44 Gren and Falls with FG42 can eat rangers for lunch if played wrong... simply thing is, rangers are not simply point and click i win dudes...
i don't think so...ok maybe if you charge a rangersquad without thomson and fireup along a road (red cover) against a mp44 pzgren squad in green cover than maybe than they would loose...
otherwise... 165healthpoints (soldier armor) VS 390healthpopints (elite armor)
is very obviously....rangers would probably win even without a thomson
true, mp44 gren arent that bad... but the falls with fg42 are different, at least in my games..
Logged
Crono
EIR Veteran
Posts: 366
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #14 on:
May 14, 2009, 10:31:27 pm »
ok, one word for you you, or more specifically, a website for balance reasons.
www.coh-stats.com
go there, read, AND I MEAN READ, something that smart people do. and then make an argument.
Also, go learn to spell, you hurt my head.
//rant off//
Logged
I will hide this........giant gun.
Pak-38 commander when going into cloak
Shenanigans
EIR Regular
Posts: 1
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #15 on:
May 14, 2009, 10:43:32 pm »
No really, Shenanigans is a penis
«
Last Edit: May 15, 2009, 05:54:00 am by EIRRMod
»
Logged
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #16 on:
May 14, 2009, 11:35:35 pm »
Do you have any idea what you're suggesting?
I mean seriously, did you think it over at least once?
6 men KCH squads? Do you imagine the infinite cries of OP? Those guys are almost unsuppresable, have an armor type that makes them only crit out to death at 4 hp, and they have the best short-ranged weapon in the game. They also get assault on all doctrines - do you imagine 6 men throwing assault nades? SERIOUSLY?!
Plz lock, thread is pointless.
Logged
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #17 on:
May 15, 2009, 01:11:52 am »
as much as i am axis lover
i don't agree with you.
check coh stats on health of troops grens have more health than rifles
the inf is most balanced part of eir imo
Logged
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #18 on:
May 15, 2009, 05:07:22 am »
i argree with griggc, i want the PIAT commandos to have 2 piat guys, and 50 weaponless guys, so i can still use the piats after the 1st battle i (or griggc) leth them face.
Quote from: Shenanigans on May 14, 2009, 10:43:32 pm
penis
the 1st time i looked at this topic i tought you say penis on your 1st post ever? that kinda lame, but after reading everything here, i agree with you: penis
and griggc, my CoH cover reads 18+, yours too?
«
Last Edit: May 15, 2009, 05:11:50 am by LeoPhone
»
Logged
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
Re: INFantry and the numbers game.
«
Reply #19 on:
May 15, 2009, 06:07:08 am »
Quote from: LeoPhone on May 15, 2009, 05:07:22 am
i argree with griggc, i want the PIAT commandos to have 2 piat guys, and 50 weaponless guys, so i can still use the piats after the 1st battle i (or griggc) leth them face.
Quote from: Shenanigans on May 14, 2009, 10:43:32 pm
penis
the 1st time i looked at this topic i tought you say penis on your 1st post ever? that kinda lame, but after reading everything here, i agree with you: penis
and griggc, my CoH cover reads 18+, yours too?
You sure? My reads 14+!
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...