Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
April 29, 2025, 04:47:03 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 0
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 5
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Salutations, EIRR of 2024
by
Olazaika1
[March 22, 2025, 02:00:47 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Draken
[December 20, 2024, 02:52:42 am]
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff? (Read 15596 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #20 on:
June 06, 2009, 11:20:49 am »
ooh! sherman gun! im all about that =D
but that still doesn't change that the standard churchill is a pos
also everyone knows aloha doesn't actually play in a physical sense, he just reads stats and stuff and imagines units fighting each other purely 1v1 in his head.
Logged
Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
Quote from: Malgoroth on October 10, 2011, 05:03:49 pm
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
Sharpshooter824
I <3 Aloha
EIR Veteran
Posts: 775
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #21 on:
June 06, 2009, 12:01:25 pm »
cromwells perform quite well? What they perfom well as tank wreckages to ninja storms, paks, P4s, panthers, shrecks ETC. aloha you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
Logged
Rawr
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #22 on:
June 06, 2009, 12:43:10 pm »
Actualy, the cromwell's only adversary is the stug - that tank it almost never penetrates, but panther and P4 frontal armor is defnately not a problem at all. I don't know if there's something screwy with the penetration modifiers, but I personaly find less use for a cromwell vs infantry than I find them at anti-tank duty.
Looking at CoH stats, it tells me cromwells should penetrate panthers not more than once every 5 shots at point blank, but they definately penetrate more often.
Vs stugs, it seems about right - 1 in 3 shots will penetrate. 1 in 2 will penetrate vs a P4.
It also says that the sherman splash is worse than the cromwell's splash, with the sherman being slightly more accurate at actualy shooting infantry.
So, I dunno, maybe the stats are screwy, I can't use corsix to check it out due to my version being screwy
.
Logged
Sharpshooter824
I <3 Aloha
EIR Veteran
Posts: 775
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #23 on:
June 06, 2009, 12:53:45 pm »
So the sherman gun on churchhill is the upgunned version or regular?
Logged
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #24 on:
June 06, 2009, 12:54:33 pm »
75mm, so it's the regular one.
Logged
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #25 on:
June 06, 2009, 12:54:47 pm »
Quote
It is, however, many of the RE doctrine abilities buff the Churchill MKIV specifically. We'll have to see how it plays out.
Where were you when Mal and I were pushing for the Churchill boost =)
Yar, what he said. RSE buffs Churchill in several ways (more accurate while not moving, 75mm upgun from a Sherman, captain-like aura bonuses, increased speed and accuracy on the move by 25%, et c.) which should make them more appealing.
Quote
Oh great a cromwell gun! so pretty much a slower moving cromwell with a bigger target to hit and something that still can't stand up to a P4 -.-
A P4 beats a churchill, barely, in most fights. With a 75mm Sherman gun the Churchill will win almost 100% of the fights against a P4 and with some health to spare as well. In addition, it has superior armor and thus hasn't the need for expensive skirts, and the Sherman main gun is excellent against infantry even on the move (unlike the Cromwell gun).
Quote
cromwells perform quite well? What they perfom well as tank wreckages to ninja storms, paks, P4s, panthers, shrecks ETC. aloha you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
The Cromwell is a very situational tank. It has absolutely awful accuracy while on the move, but it is also incredibly fast - you have to choose which one you want to use for any given situation, as firing while moving is not going to get the job done. I've had a Cromwell at nearly point blank from about half health just annihilate two PE schrek squads and a fallschirmjager squad and it limped off the field at like 10% health. That's because I stopped it rather than kept it moving. Alternatively you can always just run away if you can't outfight whatever is attacking you.
Logged
Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1:
Quote from: Akranadas
Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance.
Quote from: Akranadas
We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it.
Sharpshooter824
I <3 Aloha
EIR Veteran
Posts: 775
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #26 on:
June 06, 2009, 12:59:55 pm »
er.. the regular sherman gun rarely penetrates a P4 in my experiences, am I wrong about this?
Logged
Scaevola
EIR Regular
Posts: 32
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #27 on:
June 06, 2009, 01:03:44 pm »
Vanilla churchills are just terrible. They don't really fit any role, being terrible at assaulting positions (speed) killing infantry (slow reloading weak gun) or tanks (lol).
Logged
A witty saying proves nothing - Voltaire
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #28 on:
June 06, 2009, 01:05:14 pm »
Quote from: RikiRude on June 06, 2009, 11:20:49 am
ooh! sherman gun! im all about that =D
but that still doesn't change that the standard churchill is a pos
also everyone knows aloha doesn't actually play in a physical sense, he just reads stats and stuff and imagines units fighting each other purely 1v1 in his head.
i play every faction quite intensely atm
Logged
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #29 on:
June 06, 2009, 01:06:51 pm »
Quote from: Sharpshooter824 on June 06, 2009, 12:01:25 pm
cromwells perform quite well? What they perfom well as tank wreckages to ninja storms, paks, P4s, panthers, shrecks ETC. aloha you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about
i just watched a broadcast where u tried to flank with your church (without support) and u failed hard..
axis were not good
Logged
Bubz
EIR Veteran
Posts: 726
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #30 on:
June 06, 2009, 01:10:22 pm »
Ok aloha post a replay where you use the churchill with pro skillz and own stuff instead of saying you do that and that.
Logged
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #31 on:
June 06, 2009, 01:29:59 pm »
Quote
er.. the regular sherman gun rarely penetrates a P4 in my experiences, am I wrong about this?
A vanilla Sherman loses to a vanilla P4 almost always, but the P4 is usually very hurt.
A vanilla Churchill does about the same.
So taking the best aspect of the Churchill (armor/HP) and the best aspect of the Sherman (comparatively, the gun) and putting them together probably results in a win pretty easily.
Logged
Sharpshooter824
I <3 Aloha
EIR Veteran
Posts: 775
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #32 on:
June 06, 2009, 01:38:18 pm »
Do you realize how much I screw around aloha? Thats all I had left and what was I supposed to do camp it? Sometimes I just randomly do stupid things with it? I can get a churchhill with 50 XP in a couple rounds if I baby it enough and play the right opponents lol
I simply suicided it because I had nothing better to do with it and no XP gained with it.
«
Last Edit: June 06, 2009, 01:40:57 pm by Sharpshooter824
»
Logged
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1852
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #33 on:
June 06, 2009, 01:52:22 pm »
Quote from: Mysthalin on June 06, 2009, 12:43:10 pm
Actualy, the cromwell's only adversary is the stug - that tank it almost never penetrates, but panther and P4 frontal armor is defnately not a problem at all. I don't know if there's something screwy with the penetration modifiers, but I personaly find less use for a cromwell vs infantry than I find them at anti-tank duty.
Looking at CoH stats, it tells me cromwells should penetrate panthers not more than once every 5 shots at point blank, but they definately penetrate more often.
Vs stugs, it seems about right - 1 in 3 shots will penetrate. 1 in 2 will penetrate vs a P4.
It also says that the sherman splash is worse than the cromwell's splash, with the sherman being slightly more accurate at actualy shooting infantry.
So, I dunno, maybe the stats are screwy, I can't use corsix to check it out due to my version being screwy
.
Just stop using rabbit foot, I killed many croms with my panther, and the stats are not wrong I won many times with 10% hp panther against full hp croms, it's just matter fate :p.
Logged
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #34 on:
June 06, 2009, 02:02:10 pm »
Quote from: RikiRude on June 06, 2009, 11:13:57 am
Quote from: brn4meplz on June 06, 2009, 10:32:00 am
If it had a higher priority then infantry in regards to HMG's then it would atleast soak fire from the troops. but because no one would ever target a tank over infantry in reality thats kinda useless. The churchill is a decent tank. but your probably better off buying the later variants instead. Like the Churchill croc! ummm nom nom nom halftrack dudes!
well guys you know SOME thing is bad when you got a tester telling us to skip over a T1 -_-
Well yeah Riki, I'm a tester, not an idiot. If something isn't effective I won't use it. The only things that can sway that opinion are hilarious fun, or testing purposes. I used the Churchill it wasn't fun or effective. I moved along. Besides in the grand scheme of things whats the use unlock all 3 Churchill Variants if you only plan on using 1 or 2 of them? You gotta plan this stuff ahead of time
Logged
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint
Quote from: Unkn0wn on July 31, 2012, 03:50:15 am
Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!
Quote from: Bear on June 19, 2013, 01:24:59 pm
the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #35 on:
June 06, 2009, 02:04:46 pm »
Quote from: brn4meplz on June 06, 2009, 02:02:10 pm
Quote from: RikiRude on June 06, 2009, 11:13:57 am
Quote from: brn4meplz on June 06, 2009, 10:32:00 am
If it had a higher priority then infantry in regards to HMG's then it would atleast soak fire from the troops. but because no one would ever target a tank over infantry in reality thats kinda useless. The churchill is a decent tank. but your probably better off buying the later variants instead. Like the Churchill croc! ummm nom nom nom halftrack dudes!
well guys you know SOME thing is bad when you got a tester telling us to skip over a T1 -_-
Well yeah Riki, I'm a tester, not an idiot. If something isn't effective I won't use it.
so u wanna make everything effective in every aspect?? nice one.
every unit is effective against something else
Logged
Sharpshooter824
I <3 Aloha
EIR Veteran
Posts: 775
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #36 on:
June 06, 2009, 02:10:24 pm »
And the churchhill isn't effective against anything..period
Logged
Latios418
EIR Veteran
Posts: 443
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #37 on:
June 06, 2009, 02:17:43 pm »
I like using them to crush things. Hedges and infantry alike.
Logged
Quote
Anonymous 06/19/09(Fri)11:55 No.4931966
Is Akranadas in this thread? Fucker can't stop bragging about his "waifu taldeer" and cosplaying in an eldar farseer costume while shouting "Flithy monkeighs!" interspaced with random eldar gibberish.
aloha623
EIR Regular
Posts: 19
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #38 on:
June 06, 2009, 02:22:45 pm »
oh yeah i forgot..heavy crush
and if u purchase the mine crap thing its veryvery good at crushing.
Logged
Sharpshooter824
I <3 Aloha
EIR Veteran
Posts: 775
Re: Churchhill MK IV Needs a buff?
«
Reply #39 on:
June 06, 2009, 02:26:27 pm »
another 50 munitions to be able to crush units a couple more feet away from them? The only time you could do that anyway is if the infy don't have shrecks, otherwise you are suiciding
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...