Allied version of v1

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

November 15, 2024, 10:39:50 am

Resources

Awards

2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice

2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee

Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day! Why?

COH: Europe In Ruins > Forum > EIR Main Forums > Balance & Design > Allied version of v1

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Go Down

	Author	Topic: Allied version of v1 (Read 21051 times)
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

AmPM

Community Mapper

Posts: 7978

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #60 on: July 08, 2009, 03:13:26 pm »

lol

Yea, pulling out gives positive G's and causes a blackout, negative G's are in the dive and give you a redout....


	Logged

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

acker

EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #61 on: July 08, 2009, 03:14:34 pm »

Quote from: Mysthalin on July 08, 2009, 02:53:46 pm

However - more speed = moar boom. Basics of kinetics ^^.

That theory only works consistently with solid projectiles. Bombs, artillery rounds, mortar rounds, and rockets dig into the ground before they explode, which channels the blast upwards (which is a bad thing). In order to get the biggest effective blast against soft targets like infantry, vehicles, and tanks, you want to slow the bomb down so it digs into the ground less, or even put the arming fuze way ahead of the explosive to get a ground-burst effect. Of course, it doesn't really matter unless the bomb is traveling ridiculously fast or ridiculously slow...or you put a proximity fuze on it.

Or you could simply pack the bomb with a bajillion pounds of TNT or something.


« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 03:19:21 pm by acker »	Logged

Malevolence Offline

Donator

Posts: 1871

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #62 on: July 08, 2009, 03:41:06 pm »

Grand Slam anyone? 2500 pound bomb for the win...


	Logged

Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1:

Quote from: Akranadas

Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance.

Quote from: Akranadas

We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it.

gamesguy2 Offline

Honoured Member

Posts: 2238

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #63 on: July 08, 2009, 03:42:42 pm »

Quote from: Malevolence on July 08, 2009, 03:41:06 pm

Grand Slam anyone? 2500 pound bomb for the win...

Tallboy was a 22,000 pound bomb.


	Logged

acker

EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #64 on: July 08, 2009, 04:31:27 pm »

Quote from: Malevolence on July 08, 2009, 03:41:06 pm

Grand Slam anyone? 2500 pound bomb for the win...

It was a 22,000 pound bomb, not a 2500 pound bomb.


	Logged

Tymathee Offline

Donator

Posts: 9741

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #65 on: July 08, 2009, 05:48:20 pm »

Quote from: AmPM on July 08, 2009, 03:13:26 pm

lol

Yea, pulling out gives positive G's and causes a blackout, negative G's are in the dive and give you a redout....

okay so i had it backwards, i wasn't exactly sure which was which. I know about redouts and blackouts, i just haven'et thought or read about it in so long i forgot.


	Logged

Quote from: nikomas on October 04, 2012, 09:26:33 pm

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.

Malevolence Offline

Donator

Posts: 1871

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #66 on: July 08, 2009, 08:21:11 pm »

Sorry, 2500 was not a single measurement of that bomb. I think I meant to say 6500 pound bomb in reference to its detonation equivalent rating.


	Logged

gamesguy2 Offline

Honoured Member

Posts: 2238

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #67 on: July 08, 2009, 08:30:38 pm »

Quote from: Malevolence on July 08, 2009, 08:21:11 pm

Sorry, 2500 was not a single measurement of that bomb. I think I meant to say 6500 pound bomb in reference to its detonation equivalent rating.

6.5 tons is not 6500 pounds. Wink


	Logged

acker

EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #68 on: July 08, 2009, 08:31:30 pm »

The Blast yield for the Grand Slam was 6.5 tons of TNT. In terms of total explosive filler, it was almost 10,000 pounds...


	Logged

Malevolence Offline

Donator

Posts: 1871

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #69 on: July 08, 2009, 08:34:33 pm »

Tired.

Meant 13,000 pounds.


	Logged

dravidian Offline

EIR Veteran
Posts: 97

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #70 on: July 08, 2009, 09:14:24 pm »

i just want it implemented i dont care about the weight! implement it salan!


	Logged

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidian_people
"I pimped slapped him man!" - Coh Commando
"Ah this is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end, but, perhaps it is the end of the beginning!"
"Everyone loves Abbeville"-Cobol
Kangaroo- the very concept that you can put a blob in a can

Lt_Apollo Offline

EIR Veteran
Posts: 380

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #71 on: July 09, 2009, 12:43:26 am »

no super weapons.... period, and no v1s are not super weapons, (at least against anyone who is not deff) v1s are more like kaser guided bombs that very rarly hit there intended target if it is not a static object.


	Logged

http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/771/photo2cnh.jpg
My photgraphy

acker

EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #72 on: July 09, 2009, 12:44:36 am »

Quote from: Lt_Apollo on July 09, 2009, 12:43:26 am

But it wouldn't be a super weapon, it would be exactly the same as a V1 except it comes down twice as slow, with more damage. So it's even more like the laser-guided V1, and it'll never hit a mobile object.


	Logged

Lt_Apollo Offline

EIR Veteran
Posts: 380

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #73 on: July 09, 2009, 12:46:32 am »

how usefull is that against a wher army..... only 1 target the 88.......


	Logged

acker

EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #74 on: July 09, 2009, 12:47:46 am »

...And bunkers, and Flakverlings, and all those lovely static doomforts. Just like a V1.


	Logged

Sharpshooter824 Offline

I <3 Aloha

EIR Veteran
Posts: 775

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #75 on: July 09, 2009, 11:12:58 am »

LOL V1 isn't super weapon, its a laser guided bomb?...thats really big and kinda practically kills everything it hits, nahhh its not a super weapon just a laser guided bomb, oh it'd be so OP if allies got a super weapon yes yes...apollo lol you are so biased like aloha Roll Eyes


	Logged

Rawr

EliteGren Offline

EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106

Re: Allied version of v1

« Reply #76 on: July 09, 2009, 11:19:14 am »

And you're saying you are not?


	Logged

Quote from: deadbolt on December 30, 2010, 09:14:16 am

i prefer to no u

Quote from: deadbolt on July 30, 2012, 08:08:48 am

Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead