*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 24, 2024, 12:28:44 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: angry stomping on hitze (myst-mudkipz vs smokaz/potter)  (Read 6137 times)
0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« on: July 10, 2009, 03:20:55 pm »

feathers are ruffled in launcher, claims are disputed, and finally: challenges are made. let the game begin.

http://www.filefront.com/14013379/this%20a%20replay%20file%20packed%20with%20winrar.rar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZbckwYY9r4 (for the bc ppl)
« Last Edit: July 10, 2009, 03:24:02 pm by Smokaz » Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2009, 03:35:54 pm »

That game was more like this http://z0r.de/?id=22
Logged

Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2009, 03:36:33 pm »

Other than a comment that I was utter and complete fail that game, I think it's noteworthy to mention that bren carriers are indeed counterable... Smiley
Logged

EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2009, 03:37:20 pm »

Sure if you are smokaz or cannonball.

And how many people are that?
Logged

i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2009, 03:38:51 pm »

Sure if you are smokaz or cannonball.

And how many people are that?

Actually all you need is schrecks.

And stormies that will ambush them like this http://z0r.de/?id=27
Logged
Killer344 Offline
The Inquisitor
*
Posts: 6904



« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2009, 03:40:54 pm »

rofl..
Logged

If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
gamesguy2 Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 2238


« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2009, 03:45:27 pm »

Bren carriers are weaker versions of the IHT.

Why people are having so many problems I don't know.
Logged
Draken Offline
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850



« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2009, 03:50:14 pm »

Sure if you are smokaz or cannonball.

And how many people are that?

Actually all you need is schrecks.

And stormies that will ambush them like this http://z0r.de/?id=27

lol that site gave me many hard roflzors
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2009, 03:51:33 pm »

Bren carriers are weaker versions of the IHT.

Why people are having so many problems I don't know.

axis wasnt used to there own medicine  Cheesy
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
gamesguy2 Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 2238


« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2009, 03:54:14 pm »

Bren carriers are weaker versions of the IHT.

Why people are having so many problems I don't know.

axis wasnt used to there own medicine  Cheesy

Pretty much.

Cannonball owns a 3 bren start with a stuh and a single pak.    I dont understand why anyone would have trouble with brens.

Pak does 75% the hp of a bren in a single hit, plus it fires much faster than the 57mm.  Even a bombing run couldnt save the brens from getting owned by a single pak.

EDIT: And a strafe.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2009, 03:57:09 pm by gamesguy2 » Logged
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #10 on: July 10, 2009, 03:59:47 pm »

Well yes in this game, but imagine if a good player had microed those brens.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #11 on: July 10, 2009, 04:02:30 pm »

Quote
I like bren carriers better before the armor/hp buff
Buff was unintentional - meant for the MMG Bren
« Last Edit: July 10, 2009, 04:30:07 pm by EIRRMod » Logged
gamesguy2 Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 2238


« Reply #12 on: July 10, 2009, 04:03:03 pm »

Well yes in this game, but imagine if a good player had microed those brens.

A good player would do much better with an IHT, which is superior to a bren in every possible way.

Plus shreks>>>> piats against moving targets.  The piats in a bren couldnt even hit a moving pak.
Logged
gamesguy2 Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 2238


« Reply #13 on: July 10, 2009, 04:13:24 pm »

I actually liked bren carriers better before this "buff". They didnt cost 4 pop and you used them as tiebreakers or sucide assault, or behind the lines mine-deployment. Whenever a change is followed by a large pack of people spamming or bandwagoning a new unit, there's room for suspicion. They used to require swift response, now you have to alt tab all your AT and go berzerk on them if you want to get rid of them before they have killed off your pak, p4, hetzer etc. Goddamn piats.

The old bren carrier had 220 hp, new one has 300.

However, the old bren carrier didnt take 50% more damage from paks and had 50%(yes 50%!) dodge vs shreks, the new one only has 20%.

All in all the new bren carrier is weaker vs AT weapons, but obviously you can't kill them with small arms anymore.
Logged
Draken Offline
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850



« Reply #14 on: July 10, 2009, 04:13:39 pm »

Quote
Plus shreks>>>> piats against moving targets.  The piats in a bren couldnt even hit a moving pak.

+1

With double shreked clown car you can take down 2 piats in brens since theirs agility sux, it's easy to outmicro brens. Only problem can be rrs in closnwcar, but that's exensive for allied player.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2009, 04:15:24 pm by Draken » Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #15 on: July 10, 2009, 04:15:08 pm »

The old bren carrier had 220 hp, new one has 300.

However, the old bren carrier didnt take 50% more damage from paks and had 50%(yes 50%!) dodge vs shreks, the new one only has 20%.

All in all the new bren carrier is weaker vs AT weapons, but obviously you can't kill them with small arms anymore.



It's better against p4's, hetzers. Not sure how it does against stugs. (which has zero chance to not get circled by it)
Logged
gamesguy2 Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 2238


« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2009, 04:17:51 pm »

Yes, the new bren carrier is better against tanks.

However.  The new one also gets owned so hard by the pak.  The old bren carrier had 50% dodge vs paks and died to 2 shots.  The new bren carrier only has 20% dodge vs paks and still dies to 2 shots.

So its a tradeoff.

Plus whats with the silly pop increase to 4?
Logged
Mukip Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 450



« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2009, 05:16:06 pm »

It's not really angry, we just goaded you in the launcher to get you to play and it was a gg with no hard feelings Smiley   

It was painful to watch Mysthalin use those bren carriers, he can do better but I think he has been distracted by RL stuff today. 
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2009, 05:16:53 pm »

hah, im the master of goad i knew what you were doing. i just wanted you to work it.
Logged
RubixCubed Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 98



« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2009, 12:12:45 pm »

i don't think clown cars are exzactly overpowered (piats ones) because they are purely dedicated anti tank and you can just shrek, pak them. The only thing I see BS is the clown cars with flamers. The key weakness to a flamer is that they are low health and a clown car just negates that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 35 queries.