Two
|
|
« Reply #20 on: July 15, 2009, 12:50:51 pm » |
|
fire support and assault team?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
 Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #21 on: July 15, 2009, 01:11:18 pm » |
|
Less rivalry, more bears
Only cowards would fail to implement bears
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #22 on: July 15, 2009, 01:23:30 pm » |
|
and to correct unknown... the jumbo, fire support team and assault team are in the game, as are the american med packs those 2 infantry use. they are just well hidden and are only there for testing purposes. They are by no means OP, as their design is not to be ELITE infantry/tank but to simply add a bit of flavor. Who knows if they will make mainstream. but the only way to see how they work, is to see how they work  ooh...me wanna testy  test a 105mm sherman as well |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2009, 01:37:38 pm » |
|
Awww, its gonna be like a better Churchill....so unfairs!!
BTW Salan, where is the testing of the uparmored VI =)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #24 on: July 15, 2009, 01:39:31 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #25 on: July 15, 2009, 01:42:43 pm » |
|
lol, 3 pages for 1 question.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Ununoctium
|
|
« Reply #26 on: July 15, 2009, 02:06:29 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 My tigers get penetrated by everything. Its really really frustrating.
Your tiger is a whore |
|
|
| pernik
|
|
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2009, 02:20:26 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #28 on: July 15, 2009, 02:20:42 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 DERDBERTLike Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #29 on: July 15, 2009, 02:28:04 pm » |
|
Yes to Sherman Jumbo, give it to Infantry Perfect Infantry support tank. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| pernik
|
|
« Reply #30 on: July 15, 2009, 02:36:12 pm » |
|
Yes to Sherman Jumbo, give it to Infantry Perfect Infantry support tank. oh crap, give something new to Airborne, they need hell of a love (especially when the BARs got removed  and that's still not a new unit)... Inf is (probably) about getting an Officer  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
|
|
« Reply #31 on: July 15, 2009, 03:42:36 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
|
|
« Reply #32 on: July 15, 2009, 03:59:34 pm » |
|
i'm designing these three units to be factional, not doctrinal.. they are by no means OP, or useless..
would add a lot of factional flavor... will start working on CW and PE ones once im happy with these ones.. will test em till the whole dev team agrees and we either erase em or use em!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #33 on: July 15, 2009, 04:01:36 pm » |
|
So we too can be like OMG and add new units that really aren't needed in?
When does the madness stop.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Glaze
|
|
« Reply #34 on: July 15, 2009, 04:09:07 pm » |
|
So we too can be like OMG and add new units that really aren't needed in?
When does the madness stop.
The only thing ya need to win really is infantry (to cap territory) so by that logic I think we should just do away with vehicles completely, and only have one type of infantry, fun! Having a little more variety similar to what the Wehrmacht have would make Allied (or at least the Americans in this case) more enjoyable for a lot of people, and I trust the developers not to implement anything insane, like ACTUAL clown cars (complete with a squad of pie-wielding clowns)! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Glaze (US)!
I am also...
Glazerman (PE)
Glaza (CW)
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #35 on: July 15, 2009, 04:19:59 pm » |
|
So we too can be like OMG and add new units that really aren't needed in?
When does the madness stop.
meh, at least they are semi factional, not like the complete fake units in game, t17, m18, mardar, geshitswagen etc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #36 on: July 15, 2009, 04:53:27 pm » |
|
Ummm...Marders, Gerschutz, m18 and t17 were all real....and quite effective units.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
|
|
« Reply #37 on: July 15, 2009, 04:53:38 pm » |
|
who knows guys, they may never make it...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
|
|
« Reply #38 on: July 15, 2009, 04:54:12 pm » |
|
Ummm...Marders, Gerschutz, m18 and t17 were all real....and quite effective units.
so were jumbos! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| LuAn
|
|
« Reply #39 on: July 15, 2009, 05:08:04 pm » |
|
M4 Shermansearch for jumbo The (rare) M4A3E2 Sherman Jumbo variant had even thicker frontal armor than the Tiger I. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
aka UckY |
|
|
|
