Multiple Companies?

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Two]

They ever guna comeback?

Back in the day you were allowed 3 and it basically allowed you to have an attacking company and a defending one or let you test stuff out without having to delete your main company but you would keep your doctrine abilities instead of having to relog and remake on a fresh account all the time.

[CrazyWR]

I miss that as well. 

[Malevolence]

With the coming of the war map and encouragement to players to pick and stick to a single company, this feature should return. It let people play with their single company at all times no matter what the situation of the war.

[RikiRude]

i just ask for a log out button. so i dont have to close the launcher then re-open it to switch accounts.

[Demon767]

i

They ever guna comeback?

Back in the day you were allowed 3 and it basically allowed you to have an attacking company and a defending one or let you test stuff out without having to delete your main company but you would keep your doctrine abilities instead of having to relog and remake on a fresh account all the time.

i faintly remember devs saying they dont want people to base there companies around if there attacking or defending. so no i dont think its gonna come back.

[Illegal_Carrot]

i

They ever guna comeback?

Back in the day you were allowed 3 and it basically allowed you to have an attacking company and a defending one or let you test stuff out without having to delete your main company but you would keep your doctrine abilities instead of having to relog and remake on a fresh account all the time.

i faintly remember devs saying they dont want people to base there companies around if there attacking or defending. so no i dont think its gonna come back.

If the second company was a completely new one (having to re-choose/buy doctrines, doc unlocks, advantages, etc) then it would be fine, and even encourage players to try out different factions/doctrines/strategies/etc.

[RikiRude]

I think twos right, that's why they made modes random. they didnt like people always playing r-mode, because people had gimmicky call ins.

[Computer991]

I think twos right, that's why they made modes random. they didnt like people always playing r-mode, because people had gimmicky call ins.

They still do have gimmicky companies anyhow having multiple companies is a terrible idea it does encourage gimmicks

[CrazyWR]

its not a terrible idea.  It encourages diversity, and with the uniformity around now, thats not a bad thing.  It also helps people try new things without having to start entirely new companies and re-level, which can be frustrating.

[Computer991]

its not a terrible idea.  It encourages diversity, and with the uniformity around now, thats not a bad thing.  It also helps people try new things without having to start entirely new companies and re-level, which can be frustrating.

Explain how it would encourage diversity, i can see it now people forming new gimmicky companies to counter everything, i guess sure its nice some players would experiment but not most at least not most who want to win

[Illegal_Carrot]

its not a terrible idea.  It encourages diversity, and with the uniformity around now, thats not a bad thing.  It also helps people try new things without having to start entirely new companies and re-level, which can be frustrating.

Explain how it would encourage diversity, i can see it now people forming new gimmicky companies to counter everything, i guess sure its nice some players would experiment but not most at least not most who want to win

Have the new company require new PP to unlock doctrines/advantages/reinforcements. If someone wants to spend all their time on a 'gimmick' company, then that's time away form their main company.
Besides, if someone wants to make a gimmick company, they can just create a new battalion (with a new email) easily enough.