| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2011, 07:26:06 am » |
|
as long as they don't turn 1 mm they can move as i said if you extend its gun trough a virtual line in your mind than it'll drive backwards as long as your not clicking 1mm away from that line
otherwise it tries to turn and stop movement and a new order will fuck its pathing
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NightRain
|
|
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2011, 09:58:07 am » |
|
as long as they don't turn 1 mm they can move as i said if you extend its gun trough a virtual line in your mind than it'll drive backwards as long as your not clicking 1mm away from that line
otherwise it tries to turn and stop movement and a new order will fuck its pathing
Marder moves kinda like a StuG does... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2011, 11:09:16 am » |
|
how can it with a much slower turning rate and a much smaller object box?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2011, 11:11:47 am by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #23 on: February 02, 2011, 11:45:12 am » |
|
how can it with a much slower turning rate and a much smaller object box?
The driver likes to do the same things StuG driver does. He'll go over speed and stops very slowly if accelration is on max speed. He'll turn slowly without a road in general etc. He wants to turn to drive forward instead of backward. Those sort of things |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2011, 12:56:08 pm » |
|
uh, luft gets 'em too...i dont even think the Brits get 'em anymore only Armor and Luft have Boys AT now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #25 on: February 02, 2011, 01:07:02 pm » |
|
but fact it that allies get more use of them,since they are very effective against whole faction,unlike if u take them with luft,your enemy has to have stag/T17/m8/bren or else they wont do much...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| pqumsieh
|
|
« Reply #26 on: February 02, 2011, 01:13:07 pm » |
|
I do not think countering Boys AT rifles is difficult either when playing against the Americans. They come on riflemen which are terribly weak infantry that can be taken out with almost any form of AI. One MG will prevent forward movement of a boys squad; or an assault squad for that matter.
Ironically, with the current changes boys AT rifles will be most similar to bazookas...which come on a notably stronger platform and cost 10 munitions less. Perhaps this nerf should be accompanied with a slight price reduction. Considering the platform, penetration, and damage of the boys AT rifle (lowest out of all other forms of AT) I think a price of 50-70 munitions for the RIFLEMEN platform is fair.
In contract, the Tommy platform should be around 75-85 given their greater survivability.
On the other hand, we could slightly increase their damage or penetration and maintain their current cost.
Bottom line: they will no longer be cost effective at their current 90 munition cost on riflemen.
PQ
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Common sense is not so common after all.
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
 Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #27 on: February 02, 2011, 06:01:26 pm » |
|
how is it being addressed?
0.6 damage modifier vs 88s and ATGs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #28 on: February 02, 2011, 06:04:02 pm » |
|
and what is about completely anihilating PE?
that is way more imbalanced than killing ATGs and flaks
they should penetrate marders not from the front to often
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #29 on: February 02, 2011, 06:05:13 pm » |
|
and what is about completely anihilating PE?
Opps, forgot to tell you all that the rifle is technically an AT weapon designed for killing light vehicles. My bad. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2011, 06:06:27 pm » |
|
Opps, forgot to tell you all that the rifle is technically an AT weapon designed for killing light vehicles. My bad.
yeah a cheap never missing spamable AT weapon on a mainstream plattform to kill a complete light armored based faction especially their AT (marders 50mm HTs) not forgetting that they are comming in the doctrines with tanks PE can't reliable penetrate anyways (armor pershing, RE churchills especially the croc) |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2011, 06:09:36 pm by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
|
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2011, 06:07:03 pm » |
|
Opps, forgot to tell you all that the rifle is technically an AT weapon designed for killing light vehicles. My bad.
shit happens |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.
Work Harder |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2011, 06:42:55 pm » |
|
but fact it that allies get more use of them,since they are very effective against whole faction,unlike if u take them with luft,your enemy has to have stag/T17/m8/bren or else they wont do much...
they also do well against m-10s and m-18's, stuarts, tets, firefly's (cuz they're so close, easy to get behind/side) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
