Fuck yeah

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Malgoroth]

I meant the flamethrower itself. Someone told me once that the flammen gren flamethrower works differently in that it only damages one person at a time, unlike the engi/pio/sapper flamethrowers which damage multiple targets at once.

[Firesparks]

I meant the flamethrower itself. Someone told me once that the flammen gren flamethrower works differently in that it only damages one person at a time, unlike the engi/pio/sapper flamethrowers which damage multiple targets at once.

the flamethrower the pioneer/engineer/sapper/assaultgren get are all identical.

[chefarzt]

I know u  guys are slow. Point is the bren carrier took basicly no damage while flaming everything around it.
And the "no damage" was for free. Poor mans roo.

[TheIcelandicManiac]

Dude i did Shit with the Brens and flamers 
The only thing that saved the day was the AVRE.

[chefarzt]

Guess the avres got the same? Just have to ask coz i cba to make me a brit account right now.
Free health to make it clear.

[Uglysori]

the PE flammer have 3 mp44 + flamethrower with 80 hp + airborne armor.
The sapper just get a flamethrower.

Wait since when do my Assault Flammens get AB armor?  They might be worth a t3 unlock if they had that armor, and I am sure Falls could use the armor too.  I think the main complaint is that fausts are mediocre as LV AT.  Most Allied company infantry AT comes in pairs which usually do quick work to inf hts which come out to around 300 Hp like bren carriers.  Single faust vs two zook, 2 rr, 2 at boys rifle shots isn't going to cut though i kno the costs are different yadda yadda.

[BigDick]

I know u  guys are slow. Point is the bren carrier took basicly no damage while flaming everything around it.
And the "no damage" was for free. Poor mans roo.

listen, you used fausts that is no AT even when its pricing would let one think it kicks ass
the reality is that fausts suck as AT thats why you did no damage using it

and to discuss about adding costs to overrepair and shit would lead that you need to add cost to all single buff your falls get

-fallschirmjäger operations
- heroes of montecasino
- defensive positions
- crete veterans
- counter measures
- improved logistics
- scout training
- quick response

that are way more buffs tied to your falls

[chefarzt]

no problem with that if this applies to all doctrine buffed units
just add 25 percent from base price
well or say 15, 25 seems a bit radical

[RikiRude]

Can someone please explain to me why the are bitching and whining about sapper flamers in bcs, which you get the flames from a doctrine ability, when we've had SE flamers in HTs with a better MG on it? Or at least suppresses better? Also don't the SE units have MP44s?

I think it's hilarious when one faction gets something that's pretty similar to anothers and suddenly it's OP.

Plus how long have we had flammenwaufers? It's the same thing cept less pop cap! And well no MG, on that note, anyone notice that the flammenwaufers are a little lack luster for some reason?

[Firesparks]

Wait since when do my Assault Flammens get AB armor?  They might be worth a t3 unlock if they had that armor, and I am sure Falls could use the armor too.  I think the main complaint is that fausts are mediocre as LV AT.  Most Allied company infantry AT comes in pairs which usually do quick work to inf hts which come out to around 300 Hp like bren carriers.  Single faust vs two zook, 2 rr, 2 at boys rifle shots isn't going to cut though i kno the costs are different yadda yadda.

the assault flammer were given airborne a couple month ago.

[chefarzt]

dude the point is flame sappers in overrepaired bren carriers. just saying. Now get ur brain workin

[RikiRude]

ahhhhh ok, sorry. either way, flammens kind of lack luster.