*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2024, 02:52:27 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Poll
Question: Panther 3 for PE medium AT tank ?
Yes - 14 (45.2%)
No (PE does not need a medium tank) - 10 (32.3%)
Something else as a PE medium tank (type what) - 7 (22.6%)
Total Voters: 31

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Pe Panther 3 as medium AT tank  (Read 33745 times)
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« on: April 06, 2011, 12:45:23 am »

I've made a poll and a new thread seeing as the other one got some attention and we came to some conclusions.

Do we want this model, and stat-wise this kind of AT PE tank ?



Logged

NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2011, 12:50:43 am »

A StuG with a turret and more Damage with a cost of 210 fuel? Idk. I'd rather buy a marder and 50mm.
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2011, 12:51:28 am »

A StuG with a turret and more Damage with a cost of 210 fuel? Idk. I'd rather buy a marder and 50mm.

Not a stug,  if you want a comparison with current units think  slower m10 with panther armor.

(and to those who say  panther armor on medium tank lol !!!    ----- > jumbo  ,  allies got the version vs infantry, axis will have version vs tanks which they need actualy)
Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2011, 12:53:19 am »

Not a stug,  if you want a comparison with current units think  slower m10 with panther armor.

Hmm...Hmm...Hmm

Come to think of it though, I know what I'd spam. Cheap panthers for everyone
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2011, 12:54:00 am »

Hmm...Hmm...Hmm

Come to think of it though, I know what I'd spam. Cheap panthers for everyone

yea you can spam anything so
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 04:08:13 am by nugnugx » Logged
bayarea510 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 338


« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2011, 12:59:11 am »

It looks sexy
Logged

00:00:28 [Team] imnotsoisoisoi: they're noobish
00:01:07 [Team] imnotsoisoisoi: this is gonna be gg in 15 mins
...
00:28:50 [Team] RonnMercy: bring something on
00:29:04 [Team] imnotsoisoisoi: im out
00:29:05 [Team] RonnMercy: ur terrible lol
Gg in 30, half right at least
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2011, 12:59:30 am »

Why buy a panther when you get 2 Mini-panthers for 30 fuel cheaper and they'd do the job better than a actual panther would and be 4 pop less which means having two of them in field is only 20 pop unlike having 2 panthers which would be 28 pop. 20 Pop Full Anti armor cabilities. Though fragile to 17Pdrs and 57mms it doesn't matter. Plus quick repairs and a fast speed. This'd be 2x Better than a M10 and only cost 50 manpower and 30 fuel more. It is a damn bargain if you ask me.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2011, 01:00:01 am »

lol you can't be serious. this would rape a jumbo how are you calling it similar?

the jumbo does 87.5 dmg per shot, this does 110, it's also faster, has a faster turret rotation, faster reload and its only 210 fu vs 380 lmao

this isn't a medium tank, it's a heavy tank destroyer.

it's essentially an m-10 with panther armor and -5 range.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 01:01:37 am by Tymathee » Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2011, 01:01:11 am »

i was talking about armor


anf yes it would rape jumbo, it's designed to combat tanks not inf


heavy tank destroyer? with 400 HP?  i guess m10 is also heavy tank destroyer


Tym ofcourse is against because it's not an allied tank.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 01:02:54 am by nugnugx » Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2011, 01:03:28 am »

If you really want a Medium tank for PE just give PE a improved P4 with higher Penetration values and less splash. Call it PIV Ausf H or J if H give it Skirts that are tied to its cost and StuG armor value Grin if just J it'd be a skirtless less splash higher penetration P4
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2011, 01:04:32 am »

Heavy Tank Destroyer = Panther armor

this isn't a medium tank, like i said, it's a heavy tank destroyer. it's even freakin faster than a normal panther. lol if i had a pe coy i wouldn't buy any other AT BUT this and just spam g43's and assaults and other good ai stuff cuz this is all the AT i'd need, especially at 210 fuel
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2011, 01:05:07 am »

Why buy a panther when you get 2 Mini-panthers for 30 fuel cheaper and they'd do the job better than a actual panther would and be 4 pop less which means having two of them in field is only 20 pop unlike having 2 panthers which would be 28 pop. 20 Pop Full Anti armor cabilities. Though fragile to 17Pdrs and 57mms it doesn't matter. Plus quick repairs and a fast speed. This'd be 2x Better than a M10 and only cost 50 manpower and 30 fuel more. It is a damn bargain if you ask me.

lower range, less sight, lower damage, lower health, no mg for AI, no skirts.

Quote
especially at 210 fuel

So? m10 is cheaper
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 04:08:36 am by nugnugx » Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #12 on: April 06, 2011, 01:09:23 am »

lower range, less sight, lower damage, lower health, no mg for AI, no skirts.

In short. 27.5 less damage. 342 less health. No -10% less recieved damage, penetration -25% less handheld at dmg/pen. No munition cost other than Repair kit and no ability to use for long range sniping. And?
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #13 on: April 06, 2011, 01:09:29 am »

if you really want a medium at tank for pe i'd suggest this. just like the jumbo and pak40 used to be reward units that turned into unlocks lobby for this to be a pe unlock.

 think it'd fit the general theme of what the jumbo does and would fit luft or td pretty well (luft to copy jumbo, td cuz well just cuz)

http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=17044.0
[PE]
Jagdpanzer IV
Health - 600
Pop - 10
Speed - 5
Accel - 1.7
Decel - 2
Rotation - 30
Crush - Medium
Sight - 35
Detection - 0/0
Armor Type - Stug
Crit Type - Armor
Damage - 112.5
Range - 45
Accuracy LMS - .85/1/1
Reload - 6
Penetration LMS - .81/.93/1.05

http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=11997.0
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 01:13:00 am by Tymathee » Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2011, 01:11:50 am »

No because it's turretless, PE has enough turretless units, they need a normal tank like all other factions.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #15 on: April 06, 2011, 01:12:11 am »

if you really want a medium at tank for pe i'd suggest this. just like the jumbo used to be a reward that turned into unlock, lobby for this to be a pe unlock i think it'd fit the general theme of what the jumbo does and would fit luft or td pretty well (luft to copy jumbo, td cuz well just cuz)

http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=17044.0
[PE]
Jagdpanzer IV
Health - 600
Pop - 10
Speed - 5
Accel - 1.7
Decel - 2
Rotation - 30
Crush - Medium
Sight - 35
Detection - 0/0
Armor Type - Stug
Crit Type - Armor
Damage - 112.5
Range - 45
Accuracy LMS - .85/1/1
Reload - 6
Penetration LMS - .81/.93/1.05

http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=11997.0

Tym, that is not a tank...it is a Tank Destroyer.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
panzerman Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689


« Reply #16 on: April 06, 2011, 01:12:59 am »

PE have enough of those
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2011, 01:15:17 am »

Tym, that is not a tank...it is a Tank Destroyer.

and? whats the difference than what he's proposing? it's a freakin tank destroyer, not a tank. :| it has the same freakin aoe as an m-10, matter of fact, if you really look at it, it's an almost exact copy of the m-10 gun with a few changes in damage and range. He wants an axis version of an m-10, even the speed, accel and decel are the same
Logged
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2011, 01:16:03 am »

and? whats the difference than what he's proposing? it's a freakin tank destroyer, not a tank. :|

read thread   'panther 3 as medium AT tank'
Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2011, 01:17:30 am »

In short. 27.5 less damage. 342 less health. No -10% less recieved damage, penetration -25% less handheld at dmg/pen. No munition cost other than Repair kit and no ability to use for long range sniping. And?

His suggesting a panther that has 27.5 less damage. 342 less health. No -10% less recieved damage, penetration -25% less handheld at dmg/pen. No munition cost other than Repair kit and no ability to use for long range sniping.

And that costs 350 manpower 210 fuel and is 10 pop.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 38 queries.