RikiRude
Donator
 Posts: 4376
|
|
« on: April 21, 2011, 03:53:15 pm » |
|
These things have pershing vet tables? im imaging its just fill in? but pershings kill all sorts of tanks and stuff, i dont think a jumbo should be harder to vet than pershing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2011, 03:56:23 pm » |
|
Agreed, its kinda high but the vet is quite epic. The rcv pen along with its high rcv pen already + 20% incoming dmage at vet 1 makes it really tough.
Once I got one to vet 2, it was hecka hard to kill
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2011, 04:04:02 pm » |
|
KT is harder to get XP on than Tiger, but you know what, it takes more to vet. Whatever.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2011, 04:21:52 pm » |
|
KT is harder to get XP on than Tiger, but you know what, it takes more to vet. Whatever.
that's true as well. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2011, 04:43:20 pm » |
|
It's also more survivable then a tiger, but in the past I believe I brought up the fact that it should have slightly lower vet, though I don't remember what came of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Poppi
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2011, 06:08:58 pm » |
|
tried the jumbo. And i was like hurray US armor that is tough.
But the speed and turret speed was unbearable.
I want to get it again. As i think it maybe the onyl good t3 unlock inf has.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
 Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2011, 06:49:41 pm » |
|
Umm, artillary saturation?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2011, 07:18:18 pm » |
|
i love my jumbo <3
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2011, 08:49:23 pm » |
|
So far i enjoy it. it is taking some getting used to, but i think im going to fall in love with it, its the armor player in me i swear! It's great having a tank like this supported by an infantry company rather than a pershing or armor tanks supported by crappy nilla rifles.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2011, 04:44:58 am » |
|
vet 3 with the tank reaper buff makes it quite a good all round tank.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 DERDBERTLike Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
|
|
|
| Poppi
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2011, 07:08:48 pm » |
|
checked out the xp needed to vet. Jesus its high.
Just b/c its tough doesnt make it a killing machine. Even if one stays on a battlefield the whole match, it wont get 30-50kills like a tiger would.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 24, 2011, 08:00:34 pm by Poppi »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| panzerman
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2011, 09:42:12 pm » |
|
Jumbo > tiger.
Vet maybe needs to go down. As long as u use it to kill Inf and not heavies ur all good leave the tanks for ur rangers and 57's
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2011, 09:50:30 pm » |
|
jumbo better than tiger?! that sounds like a joke!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2011, 03:19:17 am » |
|
jumbo better than tiger?! that sounds like a joke!
Jumbo is only worse in AT role than Tiger in comparison vs axis . Jumbo does the same role as Tiger vs inf and support weapons with same effectivness because it bounces most of the shots , it's price is lower than tiger and you can have more than 2 in a company. So a Jumbo is pretty much better than a Tiger in what it provides overall in cost-effectiveness ratio. Jumbo is 10 pop, and you don't have to worry about stickies button and other allied shenaningans which axis don't have, axis don't have AP rounds and without tier buffs their medium tanks or atgs cannot penetrate jumbo. Bringing a tiger kt or jagtiger to counter a jumbo is pretty much overkill and waste of pop on field. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 25, 2011, 03:24:06 am by nugnugx »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| panzerman
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2011, 03:21:37 am » |
|
oh yeah and it doesnt need to stop to hit the infantry lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2011, 03:39:56 am » |
|
Just b/c its tough doesnt make it a killing machine. Even if one stays on a battlefield the whole match, it wont get 30-50kills like a tiger would. Typical allied squad is 6 men, typical axis squad is 4 men. Having 20 kills on a Jumbo equals 40 kills on a Tiger. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2011, 03:42:46 am » |
|
Technically, you only need to count half squad members because
A) they usally retreat if its brought down to half health
B) If they are already half squad, 1-2 kills will = 1 squad due to it pulling off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
lionel23
Donator
Posts: 1854
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 25, 2011, 04:51:57 am » |
|
Jumbo is 10 pop, and you don't have to worry about stickies button and other allied shenaningans which axis don't have, axis don't have AP rounds and without tier buffs their medium tanks or atgs cannot penetrate jumbo.
Jumbo isn't 10 POP, it's 13 POP, know what you're talking about before making incorrect assumptions. It also takes full penetration and dmg modifiers I believe from the Stug, which is an 8 pop anti-tank tank. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations, dear sir...I must say, never before have I seen such precise gunnery displayed. - CrazyWR (on Leaderboard Howitzers)  |
|
|
| panzerman
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 25, 2011, 05:02:54 am » |
|
so playing speedy or mysth stug spam is a no with these dudes...
and as i said before use it to clean up inf get a tg to deal with tanks above p4.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 25, 2011, 06:48:06 am » |
|
Jumbo isn't 10 POP, it's 13 POP, know what you're talking about before making incorrect assumptions. It also takes full penetration and dmg modifiers I believe from the Stug, which is an 8 pop anti-tank tank.
StuH has 100% pen |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
 |
|
|
|
