nugnugx
Donator
 Posts: 4051
|
|
« on: April 29, 2011, 12:52:53 am » |
|
What do you think ? After Afrika I want to make a 2v2 wake   That's bf 1942 shot  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
 Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2011, 12:57:50 am » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2011, 12:58:39 am » |
|
lawls
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Malgoroth
Donator
Posts: 960
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2011, 12:59:47 am » |
|
Oh god... the memories...
I had so much fun strafing and bombing that island.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2011, 02:22:05 am » |
|
I wonder how it would play out, if say the team that start at the very far end of the map (with no land just the two tips) split up that team, so the team is seperated into two man groups (referign to a 4v4 of course) and those two groups attack the defending side, or the side that start in a big group.
would they just rush one side, would that tactic be demolished if the side defending its narror corridor correctly, would it disadvantage the attackign team or would it be the complete opposite. oh the possiblities.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
 Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2011, 04:29:25 am » |
|
3a1(where a represents 'and') Demon.
The 4rd player could take Artillery equipped units and the 1 player could take predominantly slowing and defensive units. HMG's Mines, etc.
In the scenario where it's a forced 2a2 even accounting for perfect planning the 2a2 team just wouldn't be able to know which lane was being pressed and thus could not try and account for both offense and defense. Your best bet is something in the extreme, Like dual offense on both sides. So while your 2 Offensive mobile players are running into 3 players(and losing a Numbers game) your other 2 Offense built players should be pressing through a single player with only minor setback
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted! the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom |
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2011, 04:34:19 am » |
|
But if a teams strategy is based on that, would the 2a1 overwhelm the 1 and proceed to flank the 3a2? would that be a bad strategy unless 1 is able to hold 2 for long enough till 3 overwhelmed 2 and proceeded to support 2a1?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2011, 04:41:29 am » |
|
The player who is solo doesn't need to advance to contact with the enemy team. He simply has to build defenses early on his half. His job isn't to triumphantly raise the skills of his foes it's to bleed them and slow them. Mines, Tank traps, HMG's. ATG's. maybe even an MG bunker or MG nest
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2011, 05:16:52 am » |
|
So all of this is viable, if a team is split, there would be no implications on gameplay, just abit of foreplanning?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2011, 05:45:09 am » |
|
It'd definitely be worth a try. But from a strictly logical theorycraft standpoint the 3a1 Team wins.
In an RTS game the Attacker always has the Initiative and advantage of knowing where he wants to attack. Thats why Attacking with Sight units is always better then defending with sight units.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 29, 2011, 05:56:02 am » |
|
I hear a scenario coming together.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2011, 05:56:42 am » |
|
However, if the attacking 3a1 has offmaps, the bunched "sallying" defenders might infact lose more then required to take any advnatage
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2011, 06:17:16 am » |
|
Man i allways loved taking controll of the aircraft carriers of both sides and sail them into the edges of the map and lol at the people raging |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.
Work Harder |
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2011, 11:47:53 am » |
|
Oh god... the memories...
I had so much fun strafing and bombing that island.
God damn you, that map almost gave me a plane phobia. Then i learned to fly...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
|
