Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« on: May 15, 2011, 10:03:13 pm » |
|
When you recrew it, it says "57mm" is it really the 57 or is it just saying that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
MittinsKittens
Donator
Posts: 916
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2011, 05:37:11 am » |
|
There's also a Bug with the PAK40 and Camouflaged Equipment. If you the Pak40 gets decrewed and you recrew it with more men, you don't keep the cloak D:
Unless this is intentional :?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 EiRNames:- MittinsKittens & FlutterShyPegasus |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2011, 09:57:01 pm » |
|
True, with camo equipment you can't recloak it, I think it's the same with the Leig as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
 Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2011, 11:53:01 pm » |
|
all new weapons half-break when recrewed. I guess I can fix....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2011, 12:08:04 am » |
|
thanks Leo  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| vonsteph
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2011, 11:44:38 am » |
|
Both bugs still exist. I was playing today and recrewed my pak40 ; i couldn't cloak and it said 57mm.
BTW: When fixing this you guys should also think about decreasing reload time of the pak 40. It looses its damageadvantage due to the horrible reload time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2011, 11:45:48 am » |
|
It's supposed to have a long reload time, you sacrifice reload for damage when going for a Pak40 over the Pak38.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
|
|
|
| vonsteph
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2011, 11:53:48 am » |
|
It's supposed to have a long reload time, you sacrifice reload for damage when going for a Pak40 over the Pak38.
yeah thats true but atm reload time is too much, a bit would be good but now its just very very slow. As a tier 3 unlock it should be just better than the pak 38, maybe increase the range to balance the long reloadtime. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2011, 12:30:26 pm » |
|
reload is fine. it does 187 damage and has sick penetration. you should always keep it protected though as its a huge target
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2011, 12:57:54 pm » |
|
I have more trouble facing 17Pdrs than PAK40s. Arty arty arty, all you need is arty! LVs also rape it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
| vonsteph
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2011, 01:17:14 pm » |
|
reload is fine. it does 187 damage and has sick penetration. you should always keep it protected though as its a huge target
Dmg is fine but reload in combination with not that great range is a bit too weak. it cant get a 2nd shot on a approacing staghound or m8, before it reaches my at and kill the crew, even if i attack out of camo. i mean dmg is and penetration is good but it looses a huge its advantage due to its very slow reload.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2011, 01:26:57 pm » |
|
its the same range as all other at guns. all atgs are bad vs light vehicles thats a given. this is why you have schrecks, fausts a tank or another pak nearby if you're soloing it you're using it wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2011, 01:28:06 pm » |
|
Dmg is fine but reload in combination with not that great range is a bit too weak. it cant get a 2nd shot on a approacing staghound or m8, before it reaches my at and kill the crew, even if i attack out of camo. i mean dmg is and penetration is good but it looses a huge its advantage due to its very slow reload..
it SHOULDNT be able to get a second shot on a light vehicle. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
| vonsteph
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 01, 2011, 01:39:42 pm » |
|
its the same range as all other at guns.
Yeah but its a tier3 unlock , shouldnt it therefore be better than other atgs? I mean it has the biggest caliber, it would be plausible if it has also the biggest range!? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| RoyalHants
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 01, 2011, 01:46:18 pm » |
|
7.5 cm - brit 17q 76mm
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yeah calbanes, I mean - some people like smokaz are still yet to win a single game, even though they've been around here for years.
  |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 01, 2011, 01:46:45 pm » |
|
it is better than other atgs...and if you make it have longer range than other atgs then you could theoretically sniper other atgs without worrying about return fire so it would break things. it already has 100% acc vs other atgs along with more damage means all you need are two hits and bye bye allied atgs
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 01, 2011, 03:13:58 pm » |
|
you can do that currently by use of ap rounds on 17 pounder too
but generally range increase is a bad idea
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2011, 03:36:39 pm » |
|
17's dont have 100% acc vs all atg types far as i know i think its 50% like all else
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2011, 10:54:38 pm » |
|
17's dont have 100% acc vs all atg types far as i know i think its 50% like all else
I use my 17Pdrs to snipe other ATGs because of the very high accuracy without being afraid of return fire. 2 Shots paks, heck its better than arty when it comes to clearing out atgs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| RoyalHants
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 02, 2011, 02:13:21 am » |
|
But 17s dont have 100% accuracyy anymore far from that
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
