*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 23, 2024, 11:54:07 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [WM] Panzer Kampfwagen IV PoS or Decent?  (Read 23624 times)
0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #60 on: May 19, 2011, 01:37:44 am »

and an overall effectiveness increase. 5-10% incoming pen and damage against ALL AT is pretty dang good. Handheld AT would stay as is.

above


so thats what? hypothetical 500-1000mun for a P4 to negate the penetration increase an upgun sherman gets?

good job

how about we're making the jumbo a normal sherman that can buy skirts for 100 mun to reduce incomming penetration by 5-10%? How THAT sounds to you Tym?
Logged
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #61 on: May 19, 2011, 06:23:52 am »

Eiether way the P4 needs love, currently you invest all this muni into a medium tank and it cannt stand up to another factions medium tank at all. i shouldnt need a panther to beat shermans if your talking tanks vs tanks.
Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #62 on: May 19, 2011, 07:13:20 am »

8th,
PIV beats cromwell and 75mm sherman (be at distance for max effectiveness)

best chance against 76mm sherman is at close range but you won't beat it.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2011, 09:26:23 am by LeoPhone » Logged
panzerman Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689


« Reply #63 on: May 19, 2011, 07:22:16 am »

i thought that was the point of upgun sherman to be a counter to p4 sherman over the 75.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2011, 08:53:15 am by panzerman » Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #64 on: May 19, 2011, 09:54:06 am »

i thought that was the point of upgun sherman to be a counter to p4 sherman over the 75.

Yes, but the 76mm Sherman fairs two times better than a 75mm. You get same damage, same splash, no reload penalty and good penetration increase
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Rocksitter Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 495



« Reply #65 on: May 19, 2011, 11:04:58 am »

 5 shots for a Tiger to kill Sherman wow...
Logged

Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #66 on: May 19, 2011, 02:34:02 pm »

Tym, if you are using HEAT with Tigers you are gimping yourself. They are much better with Elite Armor Grens than with a puny damage buff and Pen that doesn't help them much.

With Medium armor HEAT doesn't do a damned thing.

Tiger without HEAT does what, 127.5?

With HEAT its a whopping 146.6

You know how much of a difference that makes when shooting, lets say, a Sherman? NONE, its 5 shots either way.

All it does is maybe kill an M10 in 3 hits, compared to killing it in 4 hits but crippling it in 3...

Or you just vet up, get the +20% at vet 3, and call it a day either way. HEAT doesn't help at all once you get that.

Anyway, why not give P4's a high pen round that does the standard 87.5 damage? Oh no! Your Pershing can be countered by medium armor just like a Tiger!!!! QQ



tigers do 137.5 and 170 something with heat, its in the rgds on win 7 now so can't check. but who says i use tigers? i have one, i use ostwinds which are great with heat + the bottom t3 and rape lv's. you do what works for u and i do what works for me, dont knock what i do cuz u dont like it
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #67 on: May 19, 2011, 04:07:37 pm »

Ah, so even less of an actual difference!

That makes HEAT so worthwhile!!

137.5 + 15% = 158.125 BTW, not 170....

So 3 shot an M10 or 3 shot an M10

4 shot a Sherman or....4 Shot a Sherman....

WOOO!! SUPER IMPROVEMENT!

Tym, try dropping HEAT, getting Battle Hardened, and laughing maniacally as your PWNSAUCE Grens support some marginally weaker Ostwinds.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #68 on: May 19, 2011, 04:15:38 pm »

Take a look at the RGD's AmPM... Just looked at the Tiger HEAT round gun.

171.875 damage. Yeah, pretty sure Tym's got you there.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #69 on: May 19, 2011, 04:39:49 pm »

Take a look at the RGD's AmPM... Just looked at the Tiger HEAT round gun.

171.875 damage. Yeah, pretty sure Tym's got you there.

I'm pretty sure ye are looking at the wrong place. AmPm is pretty much right. Gamewise too- I've never seen in any instance a Tiger 2 shooting a M10. If Tiger's HEAT boom would deal 171 damage per shot a Vet 3 Tiger would 2 shoot M10s. This however- does not happen. Therefore AmPm is right.

To the case of Panzer 4. It is just a munition hog that has very low cabilities to do anything. Unlike a Sherman this piece can't reliably charge a AT asset due to vehicle disablers, nor can it 2 shoot a rifle squad, and it has to worry about perma engine damage all the time due to sticky bombs and rather...rapid death from everything while buttoned. It can not take on M10s at all and due to M10s low cost in every part even in pop. What more can I say? P4 companies are a joke that people pretty much laughs at
« Last Edit: May 19, 2011, 04:45:11 pm by NightRain » Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #70 on: May 19, 2011, 04:44:42 pm »

my tiger two shots m10s.
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #71 on: May 19, 2011, 04:45:27 pm »

my tiger two shots m10s.

Replays to prove it, otherwise point invalid.
Logged
panzerman Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689


« Reply #72 on: May 19, 2011, 04:47:47 pm »

2nd shot always get's them down to at least a third and with vet 3 sometimes down to destroyed gun if ur lucky.
Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #73 on: May 19, 2011, 04:51:21 pm »

2nd shot always get's them down to at least a third and with vet 3 sometimes down to destroyed gun if ur lucky.


Vet 3 HEAT rounded Tiger does 189.75 damage per shot. It pretty much translates to 190 damage per shot. The second shot leaves 20 HP left for a M10 which means potential criticals might occur. This however does not mean that it will kill it due to it being 20 hp instead of 5 hp.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #74 on: May 19, 2011, 05:08:59 pm »

Ah, so even less of an actual difference!

That makes HEAT so worthwhile!!

137.5 + 15% = 158.125 BTW, not 170....

So 3 shot an M10 or 3 shot an M10

4 shot a Sherman or....4 Shot a Sherman....

WOOO!! SUPER IMPROVEMENT!

Tym, try dropping HEAT, getting Battle Hardened, and laughing maniacally as your PWNSAUCE Grens support some marginally weaker Ostwinds.

will u quit being so ruddy negative, play ur strat, i'll play mine. it works for me. look in sig, the 16-7 wm is my blitz with dual t3.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #75 on: May 19, 2011, 05:18:52 pm »

Which means very little since I know how you like to duck games...

Anyway, HEAT is far from the optimal choice. And if you are not using Tigers much you might think about dropping Panzer Aces too.

Switch to Lightning War and roll with that, faster Osts for better chasing and more kiting.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #76 on: May 19, 2011, 06:37:42 pm »

i'm working on getting lw to match my similar armor co y
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #77 on: May 19, 2011, 06:43:20 pm »

Take a look at the RGD's AmPM... Just looked at the Tiger HEAT round gun.

171.875 damage. Yeah, pretty sure Tym's got you there.

Yep RGD's got heat rounds gun.

But this doesnt mean the they get it. This could be a old weapon that isnt linked(most likely).

People would have caught on if this were true when they tried vet 3 tiger with heat rounds and they were doing superdamage.

Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #78 on: May 19, 2011, 09:00:24 pm »

Yep RGD's got heat rounds gun.

But this doesnt mean the they get it. This could be a old weapon that isnt linked(most likely).

People would have caught on if this were true when they tried vet 3 tiger with heat rounds and they were doing superdamage.



This is correct, that is not a weapon that is in use.
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #79 on: May 20, 2011, 12:15:31 am »

do stugs/stuhs benefit from HEAT? they get it,but does it make any difference on their better effectiveness?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 36 queries.