MittinsKittens
Donator
 Posts: 916
|
|
« Reply #20 on: May 20, 2011, 07:59:18 am » |
|
I honestly say take EVERYTHING  Specially that G43 change *drools* |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 EiRNames:- MittinsKittens & FlutterShyPegasus |
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #21 on: May 20, 2011, 08:34:33 am » |
|
Yeah I agree, all these changes are good, the only one I can complain about is the 88, it shouldn't be nerfed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #22 on: May 20, 2011, 08:40:09 am » |
|
Yeah, most likely we will use almost all of these.
Some of these changes are detrimental to EIRR gameplay and wont be put in. (Like the 88mm changes) and others are changes that we've already done.
So it's just a matter of separating these two type of changes and putting in the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #23 on: May 20, 2011, 09:05:41 am » |
|
eh, m18 could be useful then lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MittinsKittens
Donator
Posts: 916
|
|
« Reply #24 on: May 20, 2011, 09:17:40 am » |
|
Some of these changes are detrimental to EIRR gameplay and wont be put in. (Like the 88mm changes) and others are changes that we've already done.
I think it might be quite interesting to at least SEE what the effects these changes have to the ATGS. You really shouldn't be using ATG/88 for killing inf anyway |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Poppi
|
|
« Reply #25 on: May 20, 2011, 11:09:11 am » |
|
eh, m18 could be useful then lol.
ya for real. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #26 on: May 20, 2011, 11:29:01 am » |
|
im happy that something like the 88 change we wont see in eirr, but i think all these other changes are really good. especially the change to flame units, i think ill start using my armor company and play with crocs a bit more, and use the T2 that gives engs harder to hit as well. It'll be fun using flammenHTs in pairs now ooooh i can't wait!
the problem with flames doing more damage though, is units like KCH which already get owned by churchills and such will have to keep even more distance than they already do because they'll get smoked in about 5 seconds about.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
 Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #27 on: May 20, 2011, 11:42:40 am » |
|
EIR increased flammenwerfer dmg a long time ago already.
and it doesn't help the unit at all. flamers kill with crits, not damage.
the problem with the flammen ht is that it dies before it can get close.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheVolskinator
Administrator / Lead Developer
 Posts: 3012
|
|
« Reply #28 on: May 20, 2011, 12:37:49 pm » |
|
A big note people seem to have missed (maybe not included in the 'effects EiR' posted notes) is that the PaK no longer negates allied armor on its own. Ergo, no lol2shotcamorape on M8s etc; seeing as the PaK only gets 1 shot and cant move in EiR, I assume that might not do much of anything. But if it does, itd give allied armor a bit more of an edge in lolwtfpwning axis infantry. And the lowly P4 falls even farther behind...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #29 on: May 20, 2011, 01:39:43 pm » |
|
A big note people seem to have missed (maybe not included in the 'effects EiR' posted notes) is that the PaK no longer negates allied armor on its own.
Pak does not have camo bonus in eir since like 2 years |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #30 on: May 20, 2011, 01:51:32 pm » |
|
EIR increased flammenwerfer dmg a long time ago already.
and it doesn't help the unit at all. flamers kill with crits, not damage.
the problem with the flammen ht is that it dies before it can get close.
oh... poopy =( i saw puddin do a 5 flammen start and it didnt really do any damage, what is flammen flame damage compared to pios or engs? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #31 on: May 20, 2011, 02:06:16 pm » |
|
EIR increased flammenwerfer dmg a long time ago already.
and it doesn't help the unit at all. flamers kill with crits, not damage.
the problem with the flammen ht is that it dies before it can get close.
You are incorrect. The unit has higher kill crit chances when it is on red then at yellow. So if the damage puts it on red the next shot is a gaurenteed kill rather than a 40% chance of a kill. oh... poopy =(
i saw puddin do a 5 flammen start and it didnt really do any damage, what is flammen flame damage compared to pios or engs?
same damage, they have same flamethrower. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
MittinsKittens
Donator
Posts: 916
|
|
« Reply #32 on: May 24, 2011, 11:13:35 am » |
|
THE PATCH IS NOW LIVE! Start Downloading and Patching  ...and if own a steam version like me, then wait for steam to update :/ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #33 on: May 24, 2011, 12:07:27 pm » |
|
omg, DLing soooooo slow!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #34 on: May 24, 2011, 12:10:19 pm » |
|
i put up a link so you could pre-download it b4 it went live but nooo
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
MittinsKittens
Donator
Posts: 916
|
|
« Reply #35 on: May 24, 2011, 12:18:46 pm » |
|
Dude, the patch you uploaded is apperently broke |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
 Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #36 on: May 24, 2011, 12:32:32 pm » |
|
Yeah this patch corrupted while patching for me and I'll need to reinstall all over again
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted! the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #37 on: May 24, 2011, 12:34:12 pm » |
|
Yeah this patch corrupted while patching for me and I'll need to reinstall all over again
owned |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 DERDBERTLike Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #38 on: May 24, 2011, 12:39:48 pm » |
|
lol I can't even uninstall without it giving me an error
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #39 on: May 24, 2011, 12:40:11 pm » |
|
Dude, the patch you uploaded is apperently broke BAN HIM!!!!!! *witchhunt* |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
