Tank hunters

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Smokaz]

Terrible doctrine. Whats the new one look like? has it been finalized? can we see it?

[Unkn0wn]

It is the new one, lol. Only spare parts is missing.

[CrazyWR]

Thats just terrible.  The current tank hunter doctrine is utter shit.

[Smokaz]

Wow. total buzzkill

absolutely hate the current th, wouldnt play it if I was paid to do it (ok, maybe i would, a few months later )

[Unkn0wn]

Why is it total shit?

[Mysthalin]

Mostly because it has zero feel, zero direction and zero.. fun.

[Poppi]

Mostly because it has zero feel, zero direction and zero.. fun.

this game isnt about fun

[Mister Schmidt]

Not for you apparantly, since every single unit you use sucks and you have nothing to counter Axis with

[NightRain]

Why is it total shit?

APCR Marders were the only great adaption. Like Tank Reaper Anti tank guns. Now they are nerfed and the whole doc feels kinda meh...Jagdpanther isn't enough to increase the love for it.

[DarkSoldierX]

Wuuuuuuut.

Jagdpanther is the biggest bundle of love ever.

[CrazyWR]

Yes, jagds are super fun, but the doctrine itself doesn't provide any other incentive to play it.  If I'm only playing the doctrine for unlockable units, might as well not even have the doctrine there.  And honestly, the unlocks are great in TH, but the doctrine is just boring.

 The top t4 just makes PE AT better at what it already is fantastic at, especially when you play the doctrine with a jagd or hetzers, so its superfluous.  The middle t4 doesn't exist.  The Bottom t4 is like someone got bored and just decided to find whatever units hadnt been buffed anywhere else in the doctrine and throw them all together.

 The +15% accuracy is nice, but again, having like 3 useful doctrine bonuses out of 12 is just not exciting.  I thought zimmerit was ok, but apparently it actually makes things worse...I'd so much rather have less chance for engine damage than anything else.  Top t3 is solid, but again, it just makes PE AT better at what it does, and PE AT is already exceptional if used properly.  However, I do see the need for that sort of tree, and it does its job well.  I just don't see the point in using it when you can just unlock a jagd and use that to help your AT and use different doc buffs.

As for the t2s and t1s, they are effective and solid.  But its the t3s and t4s that make a doctrine, and the only effective doctrine tree atm is top t4 path, which is a bit pointless, since PE AT with a jagd is already ridiculously good, or dual t3s, since bottom t4 is ridiculous and mid t4 doesnt exist. 

I'd honestly rather play TH without a doctrine at the moment, perhaps it would incentivize someone creating a new one that is fun.  I think I'll take a whack at one over the next week or so and see what I can come up with.  Because honestly what we have now isn't exciting or fun.

[velocity78]

I find th pretty entertaining, dont go with jaged, go duel panthers with apcr and panzer command. You will see how fast a pershing will go down with the x7 rocket and panther having ff range 20% dmg and 35% pen. Also go with the tier 2 which lets you heal from the house with g43s.

[spinn72]

x7 rocket is the stupidest doctrine unlock I have ever seen in any game.
ever.

[velocity78]

I think there should be an actual plane coming from offmap along with lit up area surrounding the tank

[spinn72]

I think there should be an actual plane coming from offmap along with lit up area surrounding the tank

I think the majority of the community seems to agree with you there.
Not sure the BT agrees, however, otherwise we wouldn't have something worse than offmaps: stupid offmaps =p

[smurfORnot]

one of the few stuff good in TD's,lol

[CommieKiller]

It's true.

Tank Hunters absolutely suck compared to earlier TH doctrine.

[DarkSoldierX]

All docs suck compared to earlier doctrines.