Ditch Win/losses in Battle List, make it just say Battles

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[VanOwen]

It basically means battles at the moment... so why not just change the text to say games or battles.

Plus it helps people forget about their W/L ratios, which I hear those punk kids care about.

[Demon767]

no

[Heartmann]

Nice diplomatic answer there Demon , Tbh it has been discussed thou, and I  agree, the stats can be very misleading and resulting in players getting sanctioned against just because they have a poor W/L ratio.

[tank130]

VanOwen is suggesting changing the wording from Win/Lose to games or battles.

Makes sense to me. The number is actualy the games played.

[smurfORnot]

well,I do remember before people would avoid you when you had poor ratio,so would I avoid people with poor ratio. On the other hand,noobs would easier dodge some stacks. Right now I usually dont play 2v2's with random guy,and 3v3's only if there is 1 person on my side who I know who it is.

[Unkn0wn]

Yes, should be an easy fix.

[RikiRude]

agreed, good point.

[PonySlaystation]

Change it back so that you can see wins/losses please.

[Spartan_Marine88]

Nah im tired of having my W/L used against me when im trying to help some new guys get a game and have a smurf stack join against me.

[Tymathee]

maybe add a w/l ratio?

i'd love to see average points as part of everyones profile.

[VanOwen]

I have nothing with giving people a place to see their own Win/Loss information... but placing that data publically in the battle creation screen just tends to make people their gang up or avoid battles completely.

I would say its fine to have that data in another screen if you like but, having it in the battle joining screen would discourage people from playing where they would otherwise.

[Valexandes]

I would never get games. At least not on my original company.
The win loss is so horrendous i'd sit in launcher forever.

[smurfORnot]

would noobs start to dodge noobs? :p

hmm,maybe if you could make it,so it becomes visible if you have 2x or 3x times of wins than looses. So people can see if someone is rly good/stacker/or whatever so they can avoid him if they are new etc. All others can be like now,meaning it can still be normal guy with around 50:50 ratio.

[hans]

I have nothing with giving people a place to see their own Win/Loss information... but placing that data publically in the battle creation screen just tends to make people their gang up or avoid battles completely.

I would say its fine to have that data in another screen if you like but, having it in the battle joining screen would discourage people from playing where they would otherwise.

ehm to have Win/Lose ratio puplic makes no difference with the actual system!

except u play ones a week or so u know those players skill level. either intelligence or the games played compared to the lv (20 games played, still lv 7) detect obviously some lower skilled players tbh

even for balancing games the win/lose ratio is useless! i know players that play with everyone (noobs, failguys, new players) and has a negative or bad win/lose ratio although hes good player. Other players that only stack with good players gets an amazing ratio although they just might be medicore

iam for deleting the win/lose ratio, there is no sense of having it there. Battles played sounds much better!

[Heartmann]

ehm to have Win/Lose ratio puplic makes no difference with the actual system!

except u play ones a week or so u know those players skill level. either intelligence or the games played compared to the lv (20 games played, still lv 7) detect obviously some lower skilled players tbh

even for balancing games the win/lose ratio is useless! i know players that play with everyone (noobs, failguys, new players) and has a negative or bad win/lose ratio although hes good player. Other players that only stack with good players gets an amazing ratio although they just might be medicore

iam for deleting the win/lose ratio, there is no sense of having it there. Battles played sounds much better!

well said^^

[BigDick]

except u play ones a week or so u know those players skill level. either intelligence or the games played compared to the lv (20 games played, still lv 7) detect obviously some lower skilled players tbh

tell us more of ur secret stomping tips please  

i thought you get exp depending how high the rank of opponents you played was

and is it really possible to be still a lvl7 after 20 games? u sure?  

[hans]

tell us more of ur secret stomping tips please  

stomping tips? u are on the wrong horse mate!

i thought you get exp depending how high the rank of opponents you played was

and is it really possible to be still a lvl7 after 20 games? u sure?  

hmm maybe i was wrong with the detail, sry bout this. Wanted to point out sth in general.

In general u get or achieve with 21 games played rank 9. if u play 25 games and u are still not rank 9 u have two possible reasons:

1. u play with lots of noobs new guys what ever against stacks of good or medicore players although u are good and lose therefore

2. u are bad and it doesnt matter with who u play u lose coz even medicore players beat u

same with rank 6! if u have played 4 games u can get rank 6. if u played 6 games and are still lv 5 u can  easily know, that he might lost most of the games!

PS: in general means not, to win all games! u can also get rank 9 with less then 21 games played, but therefore u have to win nearly all games. But thats not the general case in my opinion!

[PonySlaystation]

damn hippies ruining eir.