[US] Infantry Equipment

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[TheIcelandicManiac]

So most of us know that infantry Equipment grants the ability to buy a single zook on riflemen for 50 mun and greaseguns 65 mun and it got me to wonder, if anyone here was before this doctrine setup they should know that zooks on rifle used to be a T2 and GreaseGuns used to be a part of the assault riflemen and most people who have used it say its a Greaseguns are good but they are hardly worth a T3 unlock.

i should get to the point sooner or later but i was just wondering what you guys would say about adding to the doctrine would be the old things like 2 Tommies for 70 mun, ability to buy satiels and maybe add a flamer unit.

Admittedly most say it would be too easy to spam and would be OP up the ass but it was balanced to death last time it was available as in it costed about 170 man but had 9 pool cost and buying flamers on it would be 70, that would mean that trying to spam it would be possible but would limit yourself to 12 assault rifles in your entire company and would ontop of that also remove your entire reserve pool(excluding 6 points) that would mean you could spam but it would be highly inefficient as riflemen are not the most effective unit of all.
all i am saying this about due to the fact that the top T3 is pretty lacklustre in its current use, this would also be supportive to the argument too that flamers are counter to KCH but engineers are made of paper so even tough Flamers toast KCH like flies on fire the KCH are going to slaughter the engineer before that is possible.

[aeroblade56]

Well i can think of a couple arguements that people will use.
1. Use a sherman croc.
2.use officer smoke
3.use RE sappers,churchil.
 

Now on to the current T3. i think that the single zook isnt worth it at all for instance if you put a single zook on every rifleman lets just say 10. thats 550 munitions. wehr you can purchase lets say 10 stickies for 600 munitions. Now the fact that a zook is only good on the rear(due to sideskirts) and even with TR although more accurate and stronger they may be the single zook on the its shity accuracy on the chance it might hit on a rear wont do much damage. now it wouldnt be so bad if they had 2 zooks or something or could use a BAR and zook, that being said a single zook isnt worth a T3.

I only take Rangers with zooks is if i use TR or im going against PE other then that they are 85% useless against any frontal and most side armor. thus a single zook will prove even less effective.

[ALLiDOisWIN]

Thats why i use only 2 ranger zooks. you never know when there are LV or lucky shots on the rear of a tank

[TheIcelandicManiac]

Well anyways they need to do something to spice up the Inf doctrine and this would be a nice way to do so.

[aeroblade56]

Bump.

[Poppi]

bug note.
smoke cost 15 mu
while its description say 10mu

[Mister Schmidt]

bug note.
smoke cost 15 mu
while its description say 10mu

Shit, that's gamebreaking

[TheIcelandicManiac]

bug note.
smoke cost 15 mu
while its description say 10mu

>http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=19142.0<
For all of the people on the forum you i least expected to not know this.

Ps: Smoke nades are fucking EPIC!!