Nug
|
|
« on: June 24, 2012, 03:29:16 am » |
|
What happened to croc, no one is using it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
 Posts: 1447
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2012, 04:28:47 am » |
|
Because it does not pay off...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 9th Armoured Engineers |
|
|
lionel23
Donator
Posts: 1854
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2012, 04:50:13 am » |
|
Too expensive and eats too much pool for companies that COULD use it (US Infantry has semi-low armor pool while airborne has lowest) while Armor doctrine you just have much better units to field that are being buffed by doctrine powers.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations, dear sir...I must say, never before have I seen such precise gunnery displayed. - CrazyWR (on Leaderboard Howitzers)  |
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
 Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2012, 05:19:26 am » |
|
I normally stick one of them in my coy's, they have their uses
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets. |
|
|
Shabtajus
EIR Veteran Posts: 2565
The very best player of one of the four factions.
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2012, 07:01:22 am » |
|
i agree with Nikomas, to have 1 is pretty cool vs storms or kchs, but more of them is not needed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I feel like if Smokaz and Shab met up it would be a 50/50 tossup to see which one of them robbed the other first.
Tries to convince people he's a good guy,says things like this. Scumbag Shab.
 |
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2012, 07:21:44 am » |
|
It needs a buff. Either to the ranger or the flamethrower damage cause US crocs are so fragile.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PrinceOfScotland
EIR Launcher Demigod
 Posts: 183
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2012, 07:26:17 am » |
|
why use us crocs while allies have 1600 fuel: enough for 4 churchil crocs and a cct
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fixing the launcher, one mistake at a time.
|
|
|
3rdCondor
Donator
Posts: 1536
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2012, 07:41:07 am » |
|
MG upgrade helps a little.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2012, 08:39:36 am » |
|
It needs a buff. Either to the ranger or the flamethrower damage cause US crocs are so fragile.
The crits are to randomized. Sometimes you're lucky and toast a ATG crew in no-time but sometimes you have a unlucky day and nothing happen. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheVolskinator
Administrator / Lead Developer
 Posts: 3012
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2012, 08:42:20 am » |
|
Longer range methinks. You get kited by AT infantry...the units that this unit is supposed to 'hard' counter (as an AI tank facing AT infantry, things get tricky) can kite it to death easily.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11420
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2012, 10:01:06 am » |
|
It could get the 10% health back for the bulldozer, maybe make it give 15% so it can take like 1 more uncloaked pak shot, but other than that its cheap and good vs specific units. Definitely worth its price.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
| IJustDontCare
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 24, 2012, 12:14:02 pm » |
|
Why not just lower the price a little rather than change the stats and risk it becoming OP.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 24, 2012, 01:49:07 pm » |
|
Could just give it the epic Church Croc flamer. TROLOLOL range.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 24, 2012, 04:46:39 pm » |
|
It could get the 10% health back for the bulldozer, maybe make it give 15% so it can take like 1 more uncloaked pak shot, but other than that its cheap and good vs specific units. Definitely worth its price.
It already gets +50 health when you buy the bulldozer. That's just over a 12% health increase yet still doesn't do a great deal. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 24, 2012, 04:52:42 pm » |
|
Would it not be smarter to give it back Churchill armor with the bulldozer and changing the MU price to FU instead?
Then it would be similar to the Axis Side armor upgrade and Kinda similar to the sherman upgun.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.
Work Harder |
|
|
| jackmccrack
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 24, 2012, 04:54:14 pm » |
|
Would it not be smarter to give it back Churchill armor with the bulldozer and changing the MU price to FU instead?
Then it would be similar to the Axis Side armor upgrade and Kinda similar to the sherman upgun.
this, IMO |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 24, 2012, 04:56:39 pm » |
|
Churchill armour would be good.
It's good enough to get reasonable amounts of bounces, but it still aint uber-leet levels of awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2012, 05:33:31 pm » |
|
Would it not be smarter to give it back Churchill armor with the bulldozer and changing the MU price to FU instead?
Then it would be similar to the Axis Side armor upgrade and Kinda similar to the sherman upgun.
I think it was like this at one point. That would be my change too. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 24, 2012, 05:38:14 pm » |
|
Yay someone agrees with me.
Ps: This is the strat forum not the balance forum.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 24, 2012, 05:45:49 pm by TheIcelandicManiac »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 24, 2012, 07:35:17 pm » |
|
Churchill armor bounced shrecks aplenty last game I played... It's hard to get tougher than that on the allied side so dafuq are you talking about... I think it would overarmor the thing.
I see them used queite a bit lately tbh, I honestly dont see the issue, they'll certainly take out an atg one on one like any other tank
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
