*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 27, 2024, 08:46:38 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 95mm crowmell?  (Read 7320 times)
0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« on: August 01, 2012, 11:14:39 pm »

How the hell do you use this thing?.

I look at stuhs and try to compare to 95mm and i just dont see the same effect.

Even today with NRG i still didnt see them as usefull as a STUH

They dont have flank speed like a normal cromwell and the turret rotates kinda slow (IMO)

With a CCT it doesn make much deffirence? i even use the 25% splash and accuracy and it doesnt seem as effective.

Its probably just me, so any advice or anything?
Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2012, 12:44:14 am »

use it standing still, not moving, prioritize things that aren't moving or when paired with a suppression tool, I dunno, never used em, but that seems to be the theory
Logged

1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies

RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2012, 01:17:43 am »

It's just you. I have no advice for allied dogs.
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2012, 07:27:57 am »

dont take accuracy, do dmg + area of affect.

I may take up my 95mm cromwell coy again just to rape with it again.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2012, 07:34:05 am by Tymathee » Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2012, 08:51:36 am »

Actually, the AoE increase is so insignificant you might as well take accuracy. Will do better vs cover and shit.
Logged

Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2012, 09:22:39 am »

Actually, the AoE increase is so insignificant you might as well take accuracy. Will do better vs cover and shit.

by itself yes, thats why i said take damage, shouldn't it add to the aoe damage thus making the larger aoe do more damage? thats what it seemed like to me.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2012, 09:30:07 am »

go with the extra accuracy because it rocks on your atgs and ffs!

Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2012, 09:46:11 am »

by itself yes, thats why i said take damage, shouldn't it add to the aoe damage thus making the larger aoe do more damage? thats what it seemed like to me.

The differences are so negligible there's no point in even discussing them.
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2012, 12:04:29 pm »

is it as good as the 1.0 accuracy that stuhs get?. or whatever the buff is because i didnt see it receive the buff in Patch notes.
Logged
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2012, 12:23:42 pm »

Im pretty sure the change wasent to the stuh, but to the projectile type itself.
Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #10 on: August 02, 2012, 12:33:05 pm »

does this thing have a hold fire button? if not it should get one.
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #11 on: August 02, 2012, 12:36:24 pm »

Im pretty sure the change wasent to the stuh, but to the projectile type itself.
You cant give accuracy buffs to projectile types Tongue
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
brn4meplz Offline
Misinformation Officer
*
Posts: 6952


« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2012, 01:07:37 pm »

Cromwell 95mm VS StuH


the 95:
Has a Turret
Has better moving Accuracy
Has lower reload time
1 Lower AoE range
100(0.1 VS 0.001) times the Suppression per shell(figure not modified by AoE suppression)[Shit dies before you notice this mostly]
Does more damage to equivalent Axis armour(compared the StuH to the Cromwell and Sherman. Compared the 95 to the P4's)
(some other inconsequential suppression differences)


Thier target tables are nearly identical as far as what they fight is concerned. You will find small differences when comparing things like Tigers and pershings though. The 95 is generally more mobile because of it's higher acceleration and deceleration. A turret also helps with taking pot shots as you don't need to try and face something.


Now where you'll see actualy differences is the Cover modifiers. The 95 is better against Garrison(but honestly both will wreck squads in buildings just from the large AoE critical done to a structure)

The StuH is better in combating heavy cover(1.0 Accuracy vs the 95's0.5)
The StuH is better at combatting light cover (1.0 Damage vs the 95's 0.75)
I don't believe we actually use the Trench modifier anymore but if we do it's a glaring discrepancy that needs fixing.
Logged

He thinks Tactics is a breath mint

Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  Tongue

the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom Wink
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #13 on: August 02, 2012, 03:54:18 pm »

does this thing have a hold fire button? if not it should get one.

agreed.

also how the heck does the stuh do so much freakin damage to cover, so basically if u go against a stuh, just run, u can't take cover behind any type of cover unless it completely blocks it.

ffs, green cover blocks 105mm shells from howitzers adn 25lbs
Logged
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2012, 03:57:03 pm »

EiR BalanceTM
Logged

Quote from: tank130
I want to ensure we have a 100% decision on the process before we do the wipe.
If not, then I wipe, then someone gets something they shouldn't, then it gets abused, then the shit hits the fan and then I ban shab.

Getting EiR:R Released on Steam

Forum Rules & Guidelines
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2012, 04:03:45 pm »

agreed.

also how the heck does the stuh do so much freakin damage to cover, so basically if u go against a stuh, just run, u can't take cover behind any type of cover unless it completely blocks it.

ffs, green cover blocks 105mm shells from howitzers adn 25lbs

its all about the trajectory of the blast, the 105 comes down directly on it self obvious, while the Stuh black is pushed forward...

realism aside, ive never noticed green cover saving infantry, its either hit or miss, if its hit, they'll all dead anyways, no matter the cover
Logged
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2012, 04:57:35 pm »

its all about the trajectory of the blast, the 105 comes down directly on it self obvious, while the Stuh black is pushed forward...

realism aside, ive never noticed green cover saving infantry, its either hit or miss, if its hit, they'll all dead anyways, no matter the cover

Cover is generally directional.

If it lands with the cover between your men and the shell it will apply its benefits.

If it lands with the men between the shell and the cover it doesn't matter that the cover symbol is over their head.
Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2012, 05:56:39 pm »

its all about the trajectory of the blast, the 105 comes down directly on it self obvious, while the Stuh black is pushed forward...

realism aside, ive never noticed green cover saving infantry, its either hit or miss, if its hit, they'll all dead anyways, no matter the cover

seriously? if the 105 comes down, it should do more damage in green, not a stuh being fired forward, the 105 is coming at a higher speed, a higher trajectory and much more explosive power...

and, realism aside, it's still stupid.

gameplay wise, the stuh will be fired more often, thus if it does more damage and accuracy to cover, it's much more useful.
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2012, 06:04:14 pm »

nothing is funner then a axis officer in green cover and a Howie shell landing on top and still walking away   Cool
Logged
Ahnungsloser Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1447



« Reply #19 on: August 02, 2012, 06:36:10 pm »

its all about the trajectory of the blast, the 105 comes down directly on it self obvious, while the Stuh black is pushed forward...

realism aside, ive never noticed green cover saving infantry, its either hit or miss, if its hit, they'll all dead anyways, no matter the cover

It's just very important for small arms fire and received suppression.
Larger guns will mostly smash the green cover (or land in front of the troups so that green cover do not count) and will still roll a direct hit (Like if there is no cover) &/or the basic damage of the projectile is so high that even a (up to) -50% received damage modifier can't save the life of a soldier.

For larger guns the received accuracy modifier for the cover type is the most possible, but when they hit they will mostly kill.
Logged

9th Armoured Engineers
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 36 queries.