Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 10, 2024, 01:27:41 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 3
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 1
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
General Forums
>
Other Games
>
Battlefield 4
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Battlefield 4 (Read 52135 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #60 on:
March 28, 2013, 07:51:43 am »
Seriously though, only so many contenders on the world stage, and the Eurozone is unlikely to go to war with anything for any reason. I suppose you could play as the French vs some African rebels....
Or Mexicans vs the Cartels...
Or China or Russia vs it's own citizens.
Could go back in time, Battlefield: 1066.
Logged
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #61 on:
March 28, 2013, 08:05:26 am »
India Vs Pakistan.
Problem solved
Logged
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint
Quote from: Unkn0wn on July 31, 2012, 03:50:15 am
Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!
Quote from: Bear on June 19, 2013, 01:24:59 pm
the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #62 on:
March 28, 2013, 09:18:58 am »
Quote from: PonySlaystation on March 28, 2013, 07:34:06 am
Yes, I'm sure that was the only reason.
You seem to misunderstand what false pretense means. I didn't point to a single reason, so it makes no sense for you to even refer to a reason.
There's a handful of reasons why the US invaded Iraq, I was simply pointing out that nuclear weapons and freeing the Iraqi people aren't among those reasons. Which is to say that the US isn't all 'good guy' when it comes to world politics, despite what popular media and the entertainment industry will have you believe.
And yes, I'm well aware that there's not a plethora of contenders when it comes to bad guys in global conflicts, but my real point really was that the modern conflict setup has gotten pretty boring by now. Not to mention that they could at the very least mix up the scenery a little. Fighting in Karkand 5588412 or chinese valley 5478 gets boring pretty quickly.
Logged
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #63 on:
March 28, 2013, 10:08:28 am »
I'd quite like to fight on home turf. Go prowling through the streets of London, Manchester or some other UK City would be fun. It'd also be fun to actually fight against a technological equal - Russians and Chinese are always portrayed as having decent, but decisively lower tech than either US, UK or EU forces and it gets kinda old.
Make some bad guys in some of the supposed "Good countries". Say, America loses it's shit for a seemingly legit reason and the EU steps up. Challengers and Leopards having to square off vs Abrams would be interesting. Now throw in some questionable reasons to just confuse the fuck out who is actually supposed to be the good guy and voila.
Shit, could even get the Ruskies to join in with the EU after some persuasion and be "Good guys" too.
Just do something fresh! Something interesting!
Logged
Quote from: brn4meplz on November 05, 2012, 10:45:05 am
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
Quote from: Mysthalin on March 27, 2014, 04:57:09 pm
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #64 on:
March 28, 2013, 10:28:37 am »
Quote from: Hicks58 on March 28, 2013, 10:08:28 am
Make some bad guys in some of the supposed "Good countries". Say, America loses it's shit for a seemingly legit reason and the EU steps up. Challengers and Leopards having to square off vs Abrams would be interesting. Now throw in some questionable reasons to just confuse the fuck out who is actually supposed to be the good guy and voila.
Tbh, not that much of a stretch
Logged
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."
Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons.
Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
Sachaztan
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2667
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #65 on:
March 28, 2013, 10:38:37 am »
Quote from: Hicks58 on March 28, 2013, 10:08:28 am
I'd quite like to fight on home turf. Go prowling through the streets of London, Manchester or some other UK City would be fun. It'd also be fun to actually fight against a technological equal - Russians and Chinese are always portrayed as having decent, but decisively lower tech than either US, UK or EU forces and it gets kinda old.
Make some bad guys in some of the supposed "Good countries". Say, America loses it's shit for a seemingly legit reason and the EU steps up. Challengers and Leopards having to square off vs Abrams would be interesting. Now throw in some questionable reasons to just confuse the fuck out who is actually supposed to be the good guy and voila.
Shit, could even get the Ruskies to join in with the EU after some persuasion and be "Good guys" too.
Just do something fresh! Something interesting!
For several reasons that will never happen, ever, in a game published by a big company.
Logged
Quote from: Tymathee on March 01, 2012, 03:10:58 pm
Demon posession is real and it's not funny, it's the creepiest thing you will ever experience.
Quote from: Jodomar on October 18, 2012, 09:45:42 am
I would also like to add I watch fox news everyday all day and will continue to watch it while being proud of that fact. I'm sure you enjoy your communist news network just as much.
Spartan_Marine88
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #66 on:
March 28, 2013, 10:53:52 am »
Quote from: Sachaztan on March 28, 2013, 10:38:37 am
For several reasons that will never happen, ever, in a game published by a big company.
those reasons are becoming less and less potent. Its the same reason why companies are starting to fire the old CEO's who stood by those reasons.
Logged
Quote from: Sachaztan on March 24, 2013, 03:49:43 pm
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #67 on:
March 28, 2013, 04:58:08 pm »
And in the end that would not really matter as last time I checked, the US has more carriers than the rest of the world combined and an airfleet that would put the rest of NATO to shame.
Overcompensation much? Yeah, but the real threat to MBT's has never been other MBT's but I believe it's been established that if you establish air superiority, MBT's are pretty fucked. While you can still have heavy SAM networks for devensive coverage, if your enemy has air superiorty your MBT's are not going to be worth much on the offensive, be they Chally's, Abrams or T90's
Logged
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #68 on:
March 28, 2013, 05:42:10 pm »
Yes, because we totally miss those other targets.
Seriously, we have weapons that can eliminate a tank battalion in one conventional missle...
Though I would be curious to see how that scenario works out with the EU/NATO/China/Russia trying to cross the ocean to the USA in the first place. Talk about a futile attempt.
Logged
DarkSoldierX
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #69 on:
March 28, 2013, 08:32:10 pm »
Quote from: Alpha TIG on March 28, 2013, 05:01:44 pm
^ your forgetting that they have so much air cos they mostly just bomb themselves, so need lots to try and make some bombs hit the other side and deal more casualties than they inflict on themselves.
A massive Air Force isn't good when it mostly attacks yourself
What kind of evidence exist that we bomb ourselves more then the enemy? US air support isn't inaccurate with the information that they recieve. And im not trying to say that other nations air support isn't.
Quote from: Alpha TIG on March 28, 2013, 04:39:56 pm
No it wouldn't, it would be GG in tank engagements involving the Challenger 2. The Abrams will fail to penetrate cos of the awesome armour, and the Challenger 2's would blow them away.
To put it in perspective, an Abrams can be penetrated by a single close range RPG (unless armour grating is put on), whereas a Challenger 2 has taken 70 close range RPG's before, and then the insurgents just gave up. The only Challenger 2 ever taken out of action was from a freindly she'll hitting the open commanders hatch and killing the crew, the tank survived though.
Correct me if I am wrong, but didnt a challenger get raped in the front by a RPG 29?
Logged
Quote from: nugnugx on June 03, 2011, 11:42:22 am
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
Quote from: BigDick on January 08, 2012, 06:47:44 am
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear
NightRain
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #70 on:
March 28, 2013, 11:12:09 pm »
They should make a game about West Germany versus East Germany and have a corrupted USA General be the cause of the conflict.
Logged
Quote from: Unkn0wn on June 05, 2011, 04:01:40 am
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Jodomar
EIR Veteran
Posts: 734
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #71 on:
March 28, 2013, 11:27:23 pm »
Abrams on the same playing field with the Challenger. Plus, Abrams has taken 70 rounds of rpg's to it's face as well. The Abrams actually has a better haul for taking shots in the face then the challenger does but the challenger has better side protection. This was changed up by the TUSK upgrades the Abrams has received which the challenger apparently can not fit. Both are good tanks and were made under separate requirements. Also don't forget the Abrams is linked with all other combat units in the field including Air Support. Not sure if the challenger has that or not as I didn't read into that much.
Now you could do another American Civil War, that would be interesting. What about Germany getting tired of bailing out other countries to decides to take them over instead. Both Interesting options that I wouldn't mind seeing. Really you can only have a set amount of countries to work with to make things plausible. Let's be honest her Somalia taken over the world just wouldn't make any sense, so we are stuck with playing the same countries/factions against one another.
«
Last Edit: March 28, 2013, 11:31:28 pm by Jodomar
»
Logged
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #72 on:
March 29, 2013, 03:27:38 am »
Quote from: NightRain on March 28, 2013, 11:12:09 pm
They should make a game about West Germany versus East Germany and have a corrupted USA General be the cause of the conflict.
Wargame, European Escalation?
Logged
Sachaztan
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2667
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #73 on:
March 29, 2013, 04:26:42 am »
afaik a challanger 2 and an abrams have never faced off against each other.
What is there to say that they both can't penetrate each others armor?
And as for USA facing off against well, anyone, let me demonstrate with this graph that shows US military expenditure vs the military expenditure of the rest of the world:
Logged
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #74 on:
March 29, 2013, 07:43:16 am »
Lets pull this back to realism.
The Challenger would be dead before the Abrams ever caught sight of it, by a missile launched from a plane or drone that isn't showing up on radar and is far enough away that they can't hear it.
Logged
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #75 on:
March 29, 2013, 08:13:25 am »
The good thing about bringing other stuff into the equation in theory fights is that other nations have Anti Missile systems or ERA.
Also they British super tech where they send an SAS team back in time to kill AmPm's mother so he can't bring other shit into this theoretical equation on this day.
Logged
DarkSoldierX
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #76 on:
March 29, 2013, 08:54:57 am »
Quote from: Alpha TIG on March 29, 2013, 06:01:17 am
Pfft, you're both talking about the Challenger 1 which was the same as the Abrams in every aspect (both had Chobham armour), except that the Challenger had a bigger gun, and the Abrams more horsepower, but the same speed (Don't get any ideas about copying, the Challenger came first).
Now, the Challenger 2 is 95% different to the Challenger 1. The biggest difference is that it has Chobham Dorchester Level 2 armour (while the Abrams has just resorted to putting on depleted uranium plates, though it does have a gun of equal size now). Basically the Challenger 2 has the edge in a fight due to it's superior armour, sure the Abrams has extra plating, but they only cover the weak sides and rear, the front is less defended than the Challenger 2 now, and the Challenger 2 doesn't need the extra plating as it has more side and rear armour than the Abrams.
Not really, both the Challenger 1 and Abrams have about the same weight, length, width, height, armour, and speed, also they look very similar (again, no funny ideas about copying, the Challenger 1 came first). So I'd say the requirements were the same.
Also, despite the Challemger 2 having 95% different parts to the Challenger 1, it's still nearly the same in all stats, it just has even better armour. So in a fight the Challenger 1 would be an equal fair fight, but the Challenger 2 would have the edge due to better armour.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1551418/MoD-kept-failure-of-best-tank-quiet.html
Alot of people say that challenger 2 does have a little bit better armour. But you fail to see that in theory the updated rounds that the abrams shoots excedes the protection of a challenger as long as its not shot in the turret and from a angle. And vice versa for the challenger.
Logged
DarkSoldierX
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #77 on:
March 29, 2013, 09:11:55 am »
Quote from: Alpha TIG on March 28, 2013, 04:39:56 pm
No it wouldn't, it would be GG in tank engagements involving the Challenger 2.
The Abrams will fail to penetrate
cos of the awesome armour, and the Challenger 2's would blow them away.
Quote from: DarkSoldierX on March 29, 2013, 08:54:57 am
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1551418/MoD-kept-failure-of-best-tank-quiet.html
You also did look at this right.
Logged
NightRain
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #78 on:
March 29, 2013, 09:16:23 am »
Quote from: nikomas on March 29, 2013, 03:27:38 am
Wargame, European Escalation?
Why not? Wargame did have a good idea as a conflict. West vs East Germany and it was a new idea in a sense. Two same nations fist fighting with one another while recieving support from outter world.
Logged
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
Re: Battlefield 4
«
Reply #79 on:
March 29, 2013, 09:17:28 am »
Quote from: NightRain on March 29, 2013, 09:16:23 am
Why not? Wargame did have a good idea as a conflict. West vs East Germany and it was a new idea in a sense. Two same nations fist fighting with one another while recieving support from outter world.
Yup, that game was pretty much goty for me and given the look of ALB... Well, CoH2 will have to put up a big show is all I'm saying.
Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...