*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 22, 2024, 08:22:40 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: can we please lower the firing priority for command tanks?  (Read 7504 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« on: June 03, 2013, 08:04:47 pm »

There is no reason this thing should be targeted over any vehicle with a gun.

Especially when its in the same screen with a firefly, a super pershing, and an m3 lee. 

Very frustrating.
Logged

1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies

RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2013, 08:06:34 pm »

 Cool
Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
terrapinsrock Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1009



« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2013, 08:11:41 pm »

Cool
Logged

Bit hard when its flaunted infront of you as a  broken reward piece of ass you'll never get to shag with.
Current Vets:
 

clonetroopers Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 534



« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2013, 08:12:38 pm »

 Grin
Logged
CommieKiller Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 144


« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2013, 12:20:40 am »

agreed
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2013, 11:14:07 am »

it has similar priorities and if its in front, it will be targeted first.
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2013, 12:51:41 pm »

no shit.  That needs fixed. It doesn't have a gun.  Targeting the unit without a gun over units such as a firefly or a superpershing is just stupid.
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2013, 01:21:20 pm »

or quad targeting pios instead of golis. ya we know.
Logged
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2013, 01:24:16 pm »

or quad targeting pios instead of golis. ya we know.
Priority tables = armour type tables. No matter how you slice it, the cromwell and the CCT will have same priorities given the shared armour type and there is no way in hell we're going to make the crom a ninja tank.
Logged

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."

Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
hans Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3497



« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2013, 01:26:27 pm »

 Cheesy
Logged



Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2013, 02:00:06 pm »

stupid arse blitz panthers. going through mah button and le charging firefly
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2013, 02:04:13 pm »

No, the real problem is that the CCT receives idiotic veterancy and is usable like a 800+ hp armored jeep and vehicle blocker. This thing needs to lose it's received damage veterancy and perhaps even be toned down to 400 base hp. It's unneccessary and frustrating the way it works now.
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #12 on: June 04, 2013, 02:07:59 pm »

No, the real problem is that the CCT receives idiotic veterancy and is usable like a 800+ hp armored jeep and vehicle blocker. This thing needs to lose it's received damage veterancy and perhaps even be toned down to 400 base hp. It's unneccessary and frustrating the way it works now.

Yeah cuz without it brit tanks are complete pieces of shit.
Logged
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #13 on: June 04, 2013, 02:10:00 pm »

No, the real problem is that the CCT receives idiotic veterancy and is usable like a 800+ hp armored jeep and vehicle blocker. This thing needs to lose it's received damage veterancy and perhaps even be toned down to 400 base hp. It's unneccessary and frustrating the way it works now.

this seems like a reasonable compromise.  Didn't know it was based off of armor type.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #14 on: June 04, 2013, 02:13:31 pm »

Yeah cuz without it brit tanks are complete pieces of shit.

 Roll Eyes

 heya

 no they aren't piece of shit without the cct beign some troll armored jeep without a gun
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #15 on: June 04, 2013, 02:16:05 pm »

nah pretty shitty try mandos without cct croms.
Logged
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #16 on: June 04, 2013, 03:40:15 pm »

mandos isnt about tanks anyways...you want good brit tanks go RE.  Just like if you want good American tanks you go Armor.
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #17 on: June 04, 2013, 03:53:15 pm »

mandos isnt about tanks anyways...you want good brit tanks go RE.  Just like if you want good American tanks you go Armor.

Um no, you can use a sherman in any us doctrine and it can perform OK, hell you can take crocs as Ab and do Really well.

All the US buffs are through doctrine unlocks and not tied into a singular unit that you lose and there goes you Tank power.

Yes the cromwell does receive some buffs through RE and RCA down 1 tree mainly. but infantry i think every T3 buffs it the sherman in someway. Same thing with armor, every t4-t3 buffs the sherman. and the sherman can be equiped with way more tools then the cromwell can. so your seeing a way more versatile unit buffed throughout every doctrine.


 not to mention the fact your paying 12+2 pop to make 1 unit excel in AI/AT.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #18 on: June 04, 2013, 04:22:52 pm »

well i think the us doctrines are better than a lot of the axis choices in regards to buffing both armor and infantry tbh. i look at my stats from eirr and i see 2-11 wl on PE, 12-14 wehr, something like 8-2 with US and something remotely good for brits. not pretending i am equally good at them all, but it shouldn't be that big of a difference seeing how much i have played all factions over time.

infantry shermans > replaced by jumbos or not used, works very well
armor - dont need to mention
ab shermans - nice crocodiles, reasonably balanced doctrine outside of airburst etc
Logged
XIIcorps Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 2558



« Reply #19 on: June 04, 2013, 05:19:30 pm »

You want to nerf the cct ?
Fine then I want its cost halved or its mgs effectiveness doubled.

Seeing its a command unit, and all command units recently got a buff.

Cct
4pop
2 Stuart body guards

300mp 90fu
Logged

some of My kids i work with shower me Wink
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 36 queries.