CrazyWR
|
|
« on: June 03, 2013, 08:04:47 pm » |
|
There is no reason this thing should be targeted over any vehicle with a gun.
Especially when its in the same screen with a firefly, a super pershing, and an m3 lee.
Very frustrating.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
 Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2013, 08:06:34 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
| terrapinsrock
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2013, 08:11:41 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bit hard when its flaunted infront of you as a broken reward piece of ass you'll never get to shag with.
Current Vets:   |
|
|
|
|
| CommieKiller
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2013, 12:20:40 am » |
|
agreed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2013, 11:14:07 am » |
|
it has similar priorities and if its in front, it will be targeted first.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2013, 12:51:41 pm » |
|
no shit. That needs fixed. It doesn't have a gun. Targeting the unit without a gun over units such as a firefly or a superpershing is just stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2013, 01:21:20 pm » |
|
or quad targeting pios instead of golis. ya we know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
 Posts: 4286
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2013, 01:24:16 pm » |
|
or quad targeting pios instead of golis. ya we know.
Priority tables = armour type tables. No matter how you slice it, the cromwell and the CCT will have same priorities given the shared armour type and there is no way in hell we're going to make the crom a ninja tank. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets. |
|
|
| hans
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2013, 01:26:27 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2013, 02:00:06 pm » |
|
stupid arse blitz panthers. going through mah button and le charging firefly
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2013, 02:04:13 pm » |
|
No, the real problem is that the CCT receives idiotic veterancy and is usable like a 800+ hp armored jeep and vehicle blocker. This thing needs to lose it's received damage veterancy and perhaps even be toned down to 400 base hp. It's unneccessary and frustrating the way it works now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 04, 2013, 02:07:59 pm » |
|
No, the real problem is that the CCT receives idiotic veterancy and is usable like a 800+ hp armored jeep and vehicle blocker. This thing needs to lose it's received damage veterancy and perhaps even be toned down to 400 base hp. It's unneccessary and frustrating the way it works now.
Yeah cuz without it brit tanks are complete pieces of shit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 04, 2013, 02:10:00 pm » |
|
No, the real problem is that the CCT receives idiotic veterancy and is usable like a 800+ hp armored jeep and vehicle blocker. This thing needs to lose it's received damage veterancy and perhaps even be toned down to 400 base hp. It's unneccessary and frustrating the way it works now.
this seems like a reasonable compromise. Didn't know it was based off of armor type. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 04, 2013, 02:13:31 pm » |
|
Yeah cuz without it brit tanks are complete pieces of shit.
 heya no they aren't piece of shit without the cct beign some troll armored jeep without a gun |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 04, 2013, 02:16:05 pm » |
|
nah pretty shitty try mandos without cct croms.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 04, 2013, 03:40:15 pm » |
|
mandos isnt about tanks anyways...you want good brit tanks go RE. Just like if you want good American tanks you go Armor.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 04, 2013, 03:53:15 pm » |
|
mandos isnt about tanks anyways...you want good brit tanks go RE. Just like if you want good American tanks you go Armor.
Um no, you can use a sherman in any us doctrine and it can perform OK, hell you can take crocs as Ab and do Really well. All the US buffs are through doctrine unlocks and not tied into a singular unit that you lose and there goes you Tank power. Yes the cromwell does receive some buffs through RE and RCA down 1 tree mainly. but infantry i think every T3 buffs it the sherman in someway. Same thing with armor, every t4-t3 buffs the sherman. and the sherman can be equiped with way more tools then the cromwell can. so your seeing a way more versatile unit buffed throughout every doctrine. not to mention the fact your paying 12+2 pop to make 1 unit excel in AI/AT. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 04, 2013, 04:22:52 pm » |
|
well i think the us doctrines are better than a lot of the axis choices in regards to buffing both armor and infantry tbh. i look at my stats from eirr and i see 2-11 wl on PE, 12-14 wehr, something like 8-2 with US and something remotely good for brits. not pretending i am equally good at them all, but it shouldn't be that big of a difference seeing how much i have played all factions over time.
infantry shermans > replaced by jumbos or not used, works very well
armor - dont need to mention
ab shermans - nice crocodiles, reasonably balanced doctrine outside of airburst etc
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
XIIcorps
Donator
Posts: 2558
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 04, 2013, 05:19:30 pm » |
|
You want to nerf the cct ?
Fine then I want its cost halved or its mgs effectiveness doubled.
Seeing its a command unit, and all command units recently got a buff.
Cct
4pop
2 Stuart body guards
300mp 90fu
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
some of My kids i work with shower me  |
|
|
|
