*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 01, 2024, 04:25:38 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[Today at 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Accuracy buffs  (Read 2797 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Katusha Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 989



« on: June 11, 2014, 10:59:43 am »

Hey so I got a question about the way accuracy buffs are written (and other buffs too actually). If a buff is +10% accuracy and original accuracy is 0.5, does this mean new accuracy will be:

1.1*0.5 = .55

or

0.1+0.5 = 0.6
Logged
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2014, 11:39:45 am »

Well, accuarcy is always 1 with a modifier for range isnt it? While I'm not entierly sure of the exact order I think shots are calculated like this, let's take an innacurate Tank Vs Inf for example.

1 * x = c * d = e and so on.

Or 1 * 0.5 = 0.5 (Range)
0.5 * 0.375 =  (Target Table Vs Inf)
0.375 * 1.1 = 0.4125 (Buff)

Or it's...

1 * 1.1 = 1.1 (Buff)
1.1 * 0.5 = 0.55  (Range)
0.55 * 0.75 = 0.4125 (Target Table Vs Inf)


Buffs also grow exponentially, for example it's not...

125 * 1.25, 125 * 1.25, 125 * 1.25 = 218.75
But it's
125 * 1.25 = 156 * 1.25 = 195 * 1.25 = 244 (decimales removed for sanitys sake)
Leading to a higher value, so gotta be careful about stacking buffs sometimes.


The exponential growth btw is why vet 4 tommies/officers are nigh immortal, over 140 effective hp vs small arms Wink
« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 11:46:06 am by nikomas » Logged

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."

Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2014, 11:43:49 am »

Reading above I want to bash my face into the wall tbh, I hate maths so I have no idea why I started doing RGD's.

By the way regarding 0.1+0.5 = 0.6, that could actually be used if we wanted to. I'm sure we have no such buffs regarding acc or damage however.
http://puu.sh/9p5GB/e86ecd81dd.png
You can see "Usage_Type" listed on the properties to the right there, that'll tell you if it's a multiplier or an addative
« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 12:00:36 pm by nikomas » Logged
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2014, 12:41:46 pm »

Definitely wouldn't want to, too many interactions resulting in certain aspects getting more value out of it; something which can't be balanced (EG adding accuracy makes Airborne armour that's moving less of a % upgrade, long range accuracy gets a larger % bonus than short range accuracy, moving accuracy gets a larger % bonus than stationary accuracy, tanks with low infantry accuracy get more of a % bonus than tanks with high infantry accuracy - basically lessening the weaknesses while hardly improving the strengths, which also messes with certain match ups, and messes with cost effectiveness).
IF... Not that we will... sheesh.
Logged
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2014, 01:06:39 pm »

I was assuming nobody was retarded enough to suggest it tbfh Wink


Anyway, that explenation long and confusing enough for you Kat?
Logged
XIIcorps Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 2558



« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2014, 04:20:30 pm »

Why dont we ?
Logged

some of My kids i work with shower me Wink
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 36 queries.