[US] M10 compared against Stug

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[aeroblade56]

Your right tank the m10 does need a buff.

heya chooses m10 with HVAP to say how aesome it is.

bounces of a panther at close range 3x.

bounces of a stug 2x.

much rape, such wow,many bullshitlies

[GORKHALI]

don't know about the panther but my stugs got advanced equipment and henchel design so it has with skirt on -15% recive penetration and -15% recive damage, so u will have hard time killing my stugs ..  

but hellcat did lots of damage , don't know if it had hvap, it was at the end of the game anyway.

[nikomas]

You should use Lightning War, it makes StuG's faster than M10's

Unless the stug has a base speed of at least 5.75 or more (and it does not IIRC) I don't see that happening

[XIIcorps]

You should use Lightning War, it makes StuG's faster than M10's

maybe lightning war and blitz.

[nikomas]

Mobile warfare says hi btw

[NightRain]

At point blank range M10 has 60% chance to penetrate StuG. From long range 50% whilst stug has 100% at short and 90% at long range. This means that M10 mostly loses in long range fights against the StuG since it can't always penetrate its armor. (yes stug armor is that good.) However point blank range M10 has the advantage. With small check up M10 has 5.2 realistic firing time. (4.2 reload 1 wind) StuG has 0 wind up and down but 7 second reload. The chances of M10 winning close range is pretty high but then we realize that StuG is cheaper. We just have to remember that M10 might need 5 shots to kill stugs due to 40% chance of failed penetration.

Basically M10 vs a well used StuG would be even match with both tanks having equally good chances of defeating one another.