Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
December 01, 2024, 01:45:45 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 0
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 5
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
Boys AT
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Boys AT (Read 31266 times)
0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #100 on:
July 14, 2009, 09:48:21 am »
Meh imo they should just be reverted, wasn't EiR most important rule to don't touch coh stats, only when necessary for very good reason.
Logged
LuAn
EIR Veteran
Posts: 572
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #101 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:02:32 am »
Ontopic: i also though that boys at rifle can actually hurt Tanks but no they dont
Another thing is that Boys AT in Kangs or so doesnt change direction like piats do and tends to shoot at infantry instead of tanks.
Offtopic: What where the initial stats of the Boys At? A smaller RR? or the same as RR?
Logged
aka
UckY
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #102 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:18:42 am »
Quote from: Draken on July 14, 2009, 09:48:21 am
Meh imo they should just be reverted, wasn't EiR most important rule to don't touch coh stats, only when necessary for very good reason.
The vCOH ones are incredibly good at sniping infantry, you're saying you want those back?
I don't think we have tweaked the AT power of the rifles.
Logged
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #103 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:19:50 am »
Similar damage to an RR, but very poor penetration against tanks and very good accuracy against infantry (and can be fired on the move, with a magazine size, rather than one shot and reload).
Quote
I don't think we have tweaked the AT power of the rifles.
Please do. Make 'em penetrate rear armor a lot more often and be more reliably effective against vehicles. Whether this is making the squad have two rifles (doubles the hit chance, which against magical phase shield pumas is good), or simply increasing accuracy or what have you, I dunno.
Logged
Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1:
Quote from: Akranadas
Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance.
Quote from: Akranadas
We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it.
EliteGren
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #104 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:33:12 am »
I agree this thing is just shit atm, it even fails vs light vehicles and halftracks.
Logged
Quote from: deadbolt on December 30, 2010, 09:14:16 am
i prefer to no u
Quote from: deadbolt on July 30, 2012, 08:08:48 am
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
Blitzen
EIR Veteran
Posts: 312
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #105 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:44:51 am »
They are super good at killing off storms though. Last game they brit used these against all 3 of my storms. Once hp gets low it seems to just pop men right off.
Logged
Quote from: Two on December 18, 2009, 03:02:20 pm
Bullshit, only fags and girls dont like star wars
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #106 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:46:03 am »
Quote from: Blitzen on July 14, 2009, 10:44:51 am
They are super good at killing off storms though. Last game they brit used these against all 3 of my storms. Once hp gets low it seems to just pop men right off.
lol, they killed them with normal rifles, don't forget about other 4 guys wtih enfields, even rifles will kill low hp storms.
Logged
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #107 on:
July 14, 2009, 11:54:42 am »
Aww, draken's sad about his 50 munitions no availability limit sniper rifle upgrade going away
.
Honestly, just buff the penetration by 25 percent or so, make it's accuracy vs infantry 25 percent(as had been stated), and not 15 percent that it actualy is.
Then make it have 35 percent more accuracy at all ranges(It's currently at 65 percent at short range) so people can rely on it to hit stuff more often.
Then it'll be fine.
Logged
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #108 on:
July 14, 2009, 12:12:31 pm »
Quote from: Mysthalin on July 14, 2009, 11:54:42 am
Aww, draken's sad about his 50 munitions no availability limit sniper rifle upgrade going away
.
Maybe we limit bren carreirs to 2, and see what will be your reaction?
Yes I'm sad that my tier 2 (50pps) ability for 50 munis sux so hard when axis has many inft rape squads.
I never found it as real problem on my PE to counter boys at rifle (keeps 11 at rifle tommies), and I dont think that buffing its at capabilities will be good, tbh noone will use it as at, with atgs and piats all around.
Logged
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #109 on:
July 14, 2009, 12:17:49 pm »
I won't give a shit - it losing men inside from pak shots, and 40 fuel a piece meant me getting rid of every single one.
Logged
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #110 on:
July 14, 2009, 03:43:32 pm »
Should give 2 for the upgrade. That way at least if it fails you can have twice as much failure so maybe you can kill something.
Logged
LuAn
EIR Veteran
Posts: 572
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #111 on:
July 18, 2009, 05:52:31 am »
Any plans on buffing the Boys AT a bit yet?
For being a handheld Anti-Tank Weapon i cant inflict as much as a scratch on most tanks
Logged
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #112 on:
July 18, 2009, 06:01:05 am »
Quote from: LuAn on July 18, 2009, 05:52:31 am
Any plans on buffing the Boys AT a bit yet?
For being a handheld Anti-Tank Weapon i cant inflict as much as a scratch on most tanks
we'll have to look at it for sure...
Logged
www.synergiesmod.com
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #113 on:
July 18, 2009, 06:01:46 am »
Boys AT Rifle really needs to pick something to be good at. As it stands it is mediocre at inflicting damage on infantry (about as good as any other vanilla rifle), it is mediocre at inflicting damage on light vehicles (can't hit them), and mediocre at inflicting damage on tanks (can't penetrate even rear armor a lot of the time, including bouncing on Marders, for which it is supposedly rated at 100% penetration from any range - I have seen this extensively occuring, and probably needs addressing as a bug).
I would rather have an expensive weapon that is good at a job than an inexpensive one that sucks at doing anything.
«
Last Edit: July 18, 2009, 06:06:15 am by Malevolence
»
Logged
LuAn
EIR Veteran
Posts: 572
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #114 on:
July 18, 2009, 06:05:04 am »
Quote from: Malevolence on July 18, 2009, 06:01:46 am
I would rather have an expensive weapon that is good at a job than an inexpensive one that sucks at doing anything.
Agreed!
On a side node: The Target Table of it may also require some work, because if you put Boys AT into a Kang, the guy with the ATRifle doesnt seem to like shooting at tanks that much.
Logged
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #115 on:
July 18, 2009, 06:13:15 am »
Quote from: LuAn on July 18, 2009, 06:05:04 am
Quote from: Malevolence on July 18, 2009, 06:01:46 am
I would rather have an expensive weapon that is good at a job than an inexpensive one that sucks at doing anything.
Agreed!
On a side node: The Target Table of it may also require some work, because if you put Boys AT into a Kang, the guy with the ATRifle doesnt seem to like shooting at tanks that much.
You don't use the AT rifle for tanks seriously, even before the patch. The only thing it could counter were light vehicles, armored cars, marders and thats about it.
Logged
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #116 on:
July 18, 2009, 06:15:03 am »
Quote from: Baine on July 18, 2009, 06:13:15 am
Quote from: LuAn on July 18, 2009, 06:05:04 am
Quote from: Malevolence on July 18, 2009, 06:01:46 am
I would rather have an expensive weapon that is good at a job than an inexpensive one that sucks at doing anything.
Agreed!
On a side node: The Target Table of it may also require some work, because if you put Boys AT into a Kang, the guy with the ATRifle doesnt seem to like shooting at tanks that much.
You don't use the AT rifle for tanks seriously, even before the patch. The only thing it could counter were light vehicles, armored cars, marders and thats about it.
How ironic thats it call Boys
AT
then
Logged
DERDBERT
Quote from: jackmccrack on August 03, 2014, 01:58:51 pm
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #117 on:
July 18, 2009, 06:17:03 am »
Well, it's modelled on the real life version obviously. By the time 1944 rolled around in the war, a boys AT rifle was only reliably able to penetrate rear or track armor, really, but when it was designed it could penetrate the front or side armor of a lot of tanks.
Logged
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410
Re: Boys AT
«
Reply #118 on:
July 18, 2009, 06:24:11 am »
Quote from: Malevolence on July 18, 2009, 06:17:03 am
Well, it's modelled on the real life version obviously. By the time 1944 rolled around in the war, a boys AT rifle was only reliably able to penetrate rear or track armor, really, but when it was designed it could penetrate the front or side armor of a lot of tanks.
it should be a cheaper version of RR, less powerful obviously
Logged
Pages:
1
...
4
5
[
6
]
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...