*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 28, 2024, 04:47:01 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [CW] Bren carrier  (Read 10813 times)
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« on: January 13, 2011, 06:28:05 am »

Why cant bren carrier be dmg by small arms fire?

Just compare it to almost any PE vehiachle(except panther/IST/hotch) which can all be dmg by standard rifleman/tommie .
« Last Edit: January 13, 2011, 06:40:57 am by Unkn0wn » Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2011, 06:30:39 am »

Ok. I compared it to infantry halftrack. Looks like they both are immune to small arms.

Next please.
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Illegal_Carrot Offline
Global Moderator
*
Posts: 1068


« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2011, 06:34:37 am »

The Bren used to take damage from small arms, but them people complained.

"My units die when they get shot! I demand a buff!"

Now Brens are immune to small arms, and require dedicated AT to take out.
Logged

Quote
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2011, 06:37:03 am »

I guess you find this completely different from the infantry halftrack or the armored car, carrot. Who both struggled because of how infantry heavy EIRR normally is and how everything that has something remotely similar to a damage-dealing weapon was able to dent and wear this down. Roll Eyes
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2011, 07:33:55 am »

Ok. I compared it to infantry halftrack. Looks like they both are immune to small arms.

Next please.

except inf halftrack is not,if u have like 2 squads with bar,in green cover,even if they are supressed,they will win...and at range,they win even easier...
Logged
Killer344 Offline
The Inquisitor
*
Posts: 6904



« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2011, 10:49:09 am »

God, the amount of retarded cinism is getting out of hand.
Logged

If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2011, 01:57:29 pm »

except inf halftrack is not,if u have like 2 squads with bar,in green cover,even if they are supressed,they will win...and at range,they win even easier...

and lmgs damage bren carriers as well as g43's, bren carriers can damage inf halftracks too, so it looks like if you upgrade your weapon you can damage and even destroy infantry carriers, sounds good to me
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2011, 03:24:37 pm »

I am quite sure that I didnt do shit do bren with mmg with smal arms,or is he different than normal bren carier?
Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2011, 03:45:30 am »

The bren carrier MMG is expensive, it's just as expensive as the puma or stuart.
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2011, 03:59:01 am »

bren 240mp 40 fuel
puma 280mp 65 fuel

bren will pin inf very quickly,can button vehiachles,and with ap rounds can destroy halftracks/puma,basically everything that is not tank. Puma has a bit more survability cuz of phase armor,but in every other aspect it is weaker.
so I wouldnt rly call him expensive  Roll Eyes
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2011, 04:08:29 am »

Bren MMG 240 MP 40 FU 4 pop
Flammenwerfer HT 260 MP 40 FU 5 pop

Think this comparison is a lot more relevant to the discussion, really.

The bren is far superior to the flammenwerfer in terms of survivability, maneouvrability and range, as well as versatility.
However, the flammenwerfer has a gun that is more efficient at killing infantry and can kill infantry in cover - something the bren is far from being able to do.

But, at the same time - I doubt the flammewerfer being effective vs units in houses is enough to warrant for it costing actually MORE than the bren carrier MMG in terms of manpower and most importantly - popcap.

I would recommend increasing the bren MMG's cost in light of this.
Logged

LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2011, 04:41:24 am »

give flammenwerfer ht PE HT armor so it doesnt die to 1 atg hit.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2011, 06:09:21 am »

It dies in two hits, this is fine for a 40 fuel vehicle?
Logged
VERTIGGO Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 392



« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2011, 01:44:41 pm »

It dies in two hits, this is fine for a 40 fuel vehicle?

Because a 25 fuel vehicle (allied equivalent) takes 3... Roll Eyes
Logged

TOV units = intentionally OP marketing gimmicks
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2011, 01:46:04 pm »

Because a 25 fuel vehicle (allied equivalent) takes 3... Roll Eyes

From what?
Logged
Firesparks Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 1209



« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2011, 02:34:52 pm »

bren 240mp 40 fuel
puma 280mp 65 fuel

bren will pin inf very quickly,can button vehiachles,and with ap rounds can destroy halftracks/puma,basically everything that is not tank. Puma has a bit more survability cuz of phase armor,but in every other aspect it is weaker.
so I wouldnt rly call him expensive  Roll Eyes

Bren carrier need the RCA specialty to suppress/pin, otherwise you're going to be shooting at them for a while.
Logged


With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2011, 02:44:00 pm »

The MMG actually suppresses pretty well without the doctrine....
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2011, 02:47:14 pm »

^ it suppresses like a .30 cal it has similar stats.
Logged
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #18 on: January 19, 2011, 02:47:19 pm »

my bren with ap killed kt from rear armour hit, pwned
Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #19 on: January 19, 2011, 02:52:01 pm »

AP Bren MMG wins a Puma any day with button and it is being relevantly cheaper too. + it can own anything with armor made of paper with AP rounds
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 35 queries.