Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 28, 2024, 04:56:22 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 0
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 5
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
[CW] Bren carrier
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: [CW] Bren carrier (Read 10818 times)
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
smurfORnot
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715
[CW] Bren carrier
«
on:
January 13, 2011, 06:28:05 am »
Why cant bren carrier be dmg by small arms fire?
Just compare it to almost any PE vehiachle(except panther/IST/hotch) which can all be dmg by standard rifleman/tommie .
«
Last Edit: January 13, 2011, 06:40:57 am by Unkn0wn
»
Logged
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: Bren carrier
«
Reply #1 on:
January 13, 2011, 06:30:39 am »
Ok. I compared it to infantry halftrack. Looks like they both are immune to small arms.
Next please.
Logged
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Illegal_Carrot
Global Moderator
Posts: 1068
Re: Bren carrier
«
Reply #2 on:
January 13, 2011, 06:34:37 am »
The Bren used to take damage from small arms, but them people complained.
"My units die when they get shot! I demand a buff!"
Now Brens are immune to small arms, and require dedicated AT to take out.
Logged
Quote
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk.
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: Bren carrier
«
Reply #3 on:
January 13, 2011, 06:37:03 am »
I guess you find this completely different from the infantry halftrack or the armored car, carrot. Who both struggled because of how infantry heavy EIRR normally is and how everything that has something remotely similar to a damage-dealing weapon was able to dent and wear this down.
Logged
smurfORnot
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715
Re: Bren carrier
«
Reply #4 on:
January 13, 2011, 07:33:55 am »
Quote from: Smokaz on January 13, 2011, 06:30:39 am
Ok. I compared it to infantry halftrack. Looks like they both are immune to small arms.
Next please.
except inf halftrack is not,if u have like 2 squads with bar,in green cover,even if they are supressed,they will win...and at range,they win even easier...
Logged
Killer344
The Inquisitor
Posts: 6904
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #5 on:
January 13, 2011, 10:49:09 am »
God, the amount of retarded cinism is getting out of hand.
Logged
Quote from: brn4meplz on April 18, 2013, 01:23:05 am
If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #6 on:
January 13, 2011, 01:57:29 pm »
Quote from: smurfORnot on January 13, 2011, 07:33:55 am
except inf halftrack is not,if u have like 2 squads with bar,in green cover,even if they are supressed,they will win...and at range,they win even easier...
and lmgs damage bren carriers as well as g43's, bren carriers can damage inf halftracks too, so it looks like if you upgrade your weapon you can damage and even destroy infantry carriers, sounds good to me
Logged
Quote from: nikomas on October 04, 2012, 09:26:33 pm
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
smurfORnot
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #7 on:
January 13, 2011, 03:24:37 pm »
I am quite sure that I didnt do shit do bren with mmg with smal arms,or is he different than normal bren carier?
Logged
PonySlaystation
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #8 on:
January 14, 2011, 03:45:30 am »
The bren carrier MMG is expensive, it's just as expensive as the puma or stuart.
Logged
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
smurfORnot
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #9 on:
January 14, 2011, 03:59:01 am »
bren 240mp 40 fuel
puma 280mp 65 fuel
bren will pin inf very quickly,can button vehiachles,and with ap rounds can destroy halftracks/puma,basically everything that is not tank. Puma has a bit more survability cuz of phase armor,but in every other aspect it is weaker.
so I wouldnt rly call him expensive
Logged
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #10 on:
January 14, 2011, 04:08:29 am »
Bren MMG 240 MP 40 FU 4 pop
Flammenwerfer HT 260 MP 40 FU 5 pop
Think this comparison is a lot more relevant to the discussion, really.
The bren is far superior to the flammenwerfer in terms of survivability, maneouvrability and range, as well as versatility.
However, the flammenwerfer has a gun that is more efficient at killing infantry and can kill infantry in cover - something the bren is far from being able to do.
But, at the same time - I doubt the flammewerfer being effective vs units in houses is enough to warrant for it costing actually MORE than the bren carrier MMG in terms of manpower and most importantly - popcap.
I would recommend increasing the bren MMG's cost in light of this.
Logged
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #11 on:
January 14, 2011, 04:41:24 am »
give flammenwerfer ht PE HT armor so it doesnt die to 1 atg hit.
Logged
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #12 on:
January 16, 2011, 06:09:21 am »
It dies in two hits, this is fine for a 40 fuel vehicle?
Logged
VERTIGGO
EIR Veteran
Posts: 392
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #13 on:
January 19, 2011, 01:44:41 pm »
Quote from: Smokaz on January 16, 2011, 06:09:21 am
It dies in two hits, this is fine for a 40 fuel vehicle?
Because a 25 fuel vehicle (allied equivalent) takes 3...
Logged
TOV units = intentionally OP marketing gimmicks
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #14 on:
January 19, 2011, 01:46:04 pm »
Quote from: VERTIGGO on January 19, 2011, 01:44:41 pm
Because a 25 fuel vehicle (allied equivalent) takes 3...
From what?
Logged
Firesparks
Honoured Member
Posts: 1209
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #15 on:
January 19, 2011, 02:34:52 pm »
Quote from: smurfORnot on January 14, 2011, 03:59:01 am
bren 240mp 40 fuel
puma 280mp 65 fuel
bren will pin inf very quickly,can button vehiachles,and with ap rounds can destroy halftracks/puma,basically everything that is not tank. Puma has a bit more survability cuz of phase armor,but in every other aspect it is weaker.
so I wouldnt rly call him expensive
Bren carrier need the RCA specialty to suppress/pin, otherwise you're going to be shooting at them for a while.
Logged
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #16 on:
January 19, 2011, 02:44:00 pm »
The MMG actually suppresses pretty well without the doctrine....
Logged
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #17 on:
January 19, 2011, 02:47:14 pm »
^ it suppresses like a .30 cal it has similar stats.
Logged
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #18 on:
January 19, 2011, 02:47:19 pm »
my bren with ap killed kt from rear armour hit, pwned
Logged
DERDBERT
Quote from: jackmccrack on August 03, 2014, 01:58:51 pm
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
NightRain
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908
Re: [CW] Bren carrier
«
Reply #19 on:
January 19, 2011, 02:52:01 pm »
AP Bren MMG wins a Puma any day with button and it is being relevantly cheaper too. + it can own anything with armor made of paper with AP rounds
Logged
Quote from: Unkn0wn on June 05, 2011, 04:01:40 am
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...