[CW] Bren carrier

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[VERTIGGO]

How can it be CHEAPER when they cost the exact same...?

Because 25 /= 40

lol and since no one wants to actually read the all three pages, let me make it simple with a quick review:

It dies in two hits, this is fine for a 40 fuel vehicle?

Because a 25 fuel vehicle (allied equivalent) takes 3...

They cost the same btw.

Bren Carrier   220mp 30fu
Infantry HT   230mp 35fu
Wher HT       220mp 25fu
M3 HT          220mp 25fu

The CW/PE HTs are more expensive for obvious reasons, I'm curious as to how the "the american equivalent half track which is half as much fuel".

Dude don't even bother posting if you're just going to reply to the last comment out of context. No one mentioned manpower or those other half tracks.

Again, my math was wrong, as I hadn't realized the target table buff specifically for the PaK > M3, but the comment from Smokaz and my reply was merely comparing the validity of 40 fuel for a 2 shot halftrack and the reverse situation. I don't like to waste all this effort on the nitty gritty, but people really need to check back to the thread of a topic before jumping in with "that's BS" etc.

Thank you, gentlemen.

[Tymathee]

 vertico, the bren mmg isn't a halftrack because it doesn't carry infantry, it's essentially a light vehicle then.

The Bren Carrier is the halftrack and its 220 30 cuz u can shoot out of it just like the pe hf is more than the bren carrier.

and even you mentioned the allied m3 and the wehr ht so i think you're getting things mixed up..

[lionel23]

I think you're confusing yourself Vertigo and are not listening to the discussion in which you yourself have created.  Tym has pointed this out, the Bren Carrier MMG is NOT a HT, the Bren Carrier is.  The Bren carrier MMG is considered a light vehicle with offensive capabilities and button or AP rounds (much like the .30cal HMG support team).

The costs are identical in terms of HT costs for the REGULAR Bren Carrier (being slightly more expensive since it can carry one squad open topped) than the American HT.

Also, I consider the M3 HT gun far superior.  It is a huge improvement over the regular .50cal due to increased accuracy and I think it has faster reloading. The Wehr HT is the best at suppression, regular Bren carrier is mainly used as an open topped vehicle while the PE HT is a great damaging and suppressing (in numbers) vehicle and being open topped enough to have two squads shoot out.

[smurfORnot]

so if u have 2 squads in it,8 guys are shooting out,even though animation only shows 3?

[lionel23]

Just confirmed with AMPM before I wanted to reply, they will pick weapons based on priorities, so you can have 2 shreks fire out when you have two single shrek squads.

[Smokaz]

What a pointless thread.

[TheIcelandicManiac]

pointlessness never hurt anyone.

[VERTIGGO]

OMG...

Need I do this?

Let me rewind one more post and spell it out for you:

give flammenwerfer ht PE HT armor so it doesnt die to 1 atg hit.

The discussion of the bren carrier led to discussion of the flammenwerfer, to which Smokaz responded about 40 fuel, etc. etc.

That said, I don't enjoy being accused of things, but if everyone is going to respond to [thread title] + [last post], it doesn't matter what I say...

Smokaz nailed though, this thread is now pointless since no one is responding to the EIRR related discussion anymore!