How can it be CHEAPER when they cost the exact same...?
Because 25 /= 40
lol and since no one wants to actually read the all three pages, let me make it simple with a quick review:
It dies in two hits, this is fine for a 40 fuel vehicle?
Because a 25 fuel vehicle (allied equivalent) takes 3...
They cost the same btw.
Bren Carrier 220mp 30fu
Infantry HT 230mp 35fu
Wher HT 220mp 25fu
M3 HT 220mp 25fu
The CW/PE HTs are more expensive for obvious reasons, I'm curious as to how the "the american equivalent half track which is half as much fuel".
Dude don't even bother posting if you're just going to reply to the last comment out of context. No one mentioned manpower or those other half tracks.
Again, my math was wrong, as I hadn't realized the target table buff specifically for the PaK > M3, but the comment from Smokaz and my reply was merely comparing the validity of 40 fuel for a 2 shot halftrack and the reverse situation. I don't like to waste all this effort on the nitty gritty, but people really need to check back to the thread of a topic before jumping in with "that's BS" etc.
Thank you, gentlemen.