Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
 Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #180 on: June 15, 2011, 04:19:07 am » |
|
True but the hardcap is also meant as a guideline so that new players don't buy 30 captains.
That's an utter bullshit argument and you know it. New players are new. Not retarded. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #181 on: June 15, 2011, 04:22:54 am » |
|
Pony, are, are you genuinely being serious...?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #182 on: June 15, 2011, 04:28:13 am » |
|
That's an utter bullshit argument and you know it.
New players are new. Not retarded.
i saw a guy starting with 12 CCTs oh wait it was deadbolt  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #183 on: June 15, 2011, 04:33:36 am » |
|
That's an utter bullshit argument and you know it.
New players are new. Not retarded.
There are other reasons of course, I just think it's helpful to players who may not know how many they should have in their company. It's not very realistic, fun or balanced to face a call-in with mostly officers, that's why the hardcap was introduced, but that's still off-topic. Try to remain on topic please. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #184 on: June 15, 2011, 04:37:51 am » |
|
No, the reason the hardcap was introduced because people cycled 6 FOO officers. Now that FOO is on global cooldown, it doesn't matter - hence hardcap can be removed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #185 on: June 15, 2011, 04:40:45 am » |
|
Which is basically what I said. From a balance perspective it may work but that doesn't mean that they want to see call-ins with 6 captains, it would just be stupid. Plus the high crit chances may still mess things up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #186 on: June 15, 2011, 04:41:19 am » |
|
This topic is over, everything that can be said, has been.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #187 on: June 15, 2011, 04:46:07 am » |
|
Which is basically what I said. From a balance perspective it may work but that doesn't mean that they want to see call-ins with 6 captains, it would just be stupid. Plus the high crit chances may still mess things up.
... No? It was put in ENTIRELY on balance grounds. A foo every minute or such was ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #188 on: June 15, 2011, 04:49:31 am » |
|
Mysthalin is right actually, now that all the officer tied off-maps are on global cooldown and since multiple officer auras don't stack, there's very little reason for us to keep the hardcaps in place.
Though I don't even think anyone in their right mind would hit the current hardcap limit.
(Unless you're really losing your officers constantly, in which case hardcaps are currently only punishing players with poor micro)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #189 on: June 15, 2011, 04:52:26 am » |
|
Though I don't even think anyone in their right mind would hit the current hardcap limit.
(Unless you're really losing your officers constantly, in which case hardcaps are currently only punishing players with poor micro)
Exactly. Myst, you proved your point. Now can we get back to topic? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #190 on: June 15, 2011, 04:53:34 am » |
|
... which was also an argument why we don't need them any more, lol.
We'll probably get rid of them in a future patch, I'll bring it up with the other devs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #191 on: June 15, 2011, 04:57:52 am » |
|
... which was also an argument why we don't need them any more, lol.
Yes but his first argument was that you shouldn't need to hardcap a unit from the start unless there is something wrong with it and he's right about that. But that still doesn't change the fact that it makes little or no difference to remove the hardcap as players will not need so many officers. In any case, it should not be discussed in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #192 on: June 15, 2011, 09:02:09 am » |
|
Guys! My americans don't have a halftrack I can shoot out of! I DEMAND I GET ONE!
PE and CW already gots one! Mirroring is a bullshit argument u cant say it!
Guys! My allies dont have a 88 type unit! I DEMAND I GET ONE!
PE and WM already gots 88's! WHY SHOULDNT ALLIES GET THEM? Mirroring is a bullshit argument u cant say it!
Guys! My CW basic inf doesn't have a cheap ballistic pure AI gun type DPS weapon!
PE, WM, AM, all haves G43,Bar,Mp40,LMG. 2x brens with there less DPS than 1 LMG when target tables is added in is not enough!
I want british tomyguns! Why shouldn't CW get a pure AI weapon they can assault with and not rely on shitty acc! Mirroring is a bullshit argument! Me want! Me want!
You cant say mirroring because thats a stale argument you cant use!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 15, 2011, 09:12:28 am by DarkSoldierX »
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #194 on: June 15, 2011, 09:46:51 am » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| COHCommando
|
|
« Reply #195 on: June 15, 2011, 10:10:00 am » |
|
back then when you could order wehr units your could get the wehr sniper that did not go good for pe because a lot of support goes into other units and the manpower and muntion is not there why would you want to spend 500 manpower and 200 muntion when you could repair your own units and equip with better things
you would have to spend a lot of pp just to get it or rearange your entire company
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #196 on: June 15, 2011, 10:27:05 am » |
|
dunno but i disagree
a sniper would actually save you a lot of mp fuel and munitions by taking out ATGs and mgs
not everyone puts tons of munitions into schrecks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
 Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #197 on: June 15, 2011, 10:50:53 am » |
|
dunno but i disagree
a sniper would actually save you a lot of mp fuel and munitions by taking out ATGs and mgs
not everyone puts tons of munitions into schrecks
oh i just had the thought of a marder + sniper attacking atgs and how frustrating it would be. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #198 on: June 15, 2011, 10:58:50 am » |
|
In conclusion, PE sniper is awesome, let's do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #199 on: June 15, 2011, 11:15:18 am » |
|
oh i just had the thought of a marder + sniper attacking atgs and how frustrating it would be.
yes marder attacking atgs..... where atg is a direct counter to marder. more effective is pak + sniper vs atg. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
