*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 15, 2024, 04:16:38 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Only nubs use Heavy & Super Heavy Tanks!  (Read 21831 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18379


« Reply #40 on: May 22, 2011, 07:29:56 am »

Keep it civil guys.
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #41 on: May 22, 2011, 08:00:17 am »

Quote
The reality is (from my perspective), give anyone who is not an utter noob a super heavy/heavy tank and chances are, they'll suddenly do very well.

well,thats only your reality,as Tym also has his own view of reality  Roll Eyes

give noob Tiger/KT and it will fail and do nothing...and no,they suddenly wont do very well. Heavies are not  'I winn' button ,they are more hit or miss.
Logged
Mister Schmidt Offline
Lawmaker
*
Posts: 5006



« Reply #42 on: May 22, 2011, 08:17:06 am »

LOL. Well, so its wrong to think you're better than them?

No, I just don't think it's necessary to class them as being "below" you, in terms of a player. If you're better, by all means, fine, you most likely are, just, I dunno, don't be so mean? Cheesy
Logged

and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
Vermillion_Hawk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1282



« Reply #43 on: May 22, 2011, 09:14:39 am »

So let me get this straight cloud, your screwed-up sense of honor or something tells you that heavy/superheavy tanks are "too easy" to use, and so you refuse to use them, and then try to inflict this on everyone else by nerfing them? It's like saying, "I'm going to bring a knife to a gunfight because I feel that guns are overpowered!" The fact that you believe they are dishonorable or whatever dos not in any way make them a less-viable tactic.
Logged

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.

- Andre Malraux

- Dracula
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #44 on: May 22, 2011, 09:23:29 am »

You don't have to accept his point of view, Vermilion, but it is not hard to understand the logic behind it.

Games are fun. Games are fun because they are challenging. Challenge comes from having to overcome obstacles that require skill. The battlefield utility you gain from using this kind of unit in attempts to win is less dependent on skill than other units similar in nature (I.E. Medium tanks). Hence less skill is involved. Hence the challenge part of overcoming the obstacles via skill is diluted. Hence less fun is derived from the challenge. Hence less fun is created overall.

This entire logical flowchart does make one particular assumption : in that it requires less skill to use heavy tanks than it does to require medium tanks - and as such, since there hasn't been any statistically or mathematically-based analysis of heavy and medium tanks, this viewpoint is entirely subjective. His point of view on the subject is just as valid as yours is - and it may well be so that both of you are wrong.

So, either use the maths (or other objective proof) to back up your own ideas to prove them, or do not claim that your ideas are in any way superior to that of another person just because you feel that way.
Logged

Vermillion_Hawk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1282



« Reply #45 on: May 22, 2011, 09:33:43 am »

You don't have to accept his point of view, Vermilion, but it is not hard to understand the logic behind it.

Games are fun. Games are fun because they are challenging. Challenge comes from having to overcome obstacles that require skill. The battlefield utility you gain from using this kind of unit in attempts to win is less dependent on skill than other units similar in nature (I.E. Medium tanks). Hence less skill is involved. Hence the challenge part of overcoming the obstacles via skill is diluted. Hence less fun is derived from the challenge. Hence less fun is created overall.


Despite your admirable attempt to machinize everything, I highly doubt there is no subjective, constant way to mathematically calculate fun based on the usage of units. I personally find it fun to use superheavy tanks, and in no way do I believe it allows me to win easier than using regular medium tanks, quite the opposite in fact, I win more often on my companies that don't use superheavies. I only use superheavies because they are FUN in my opinion.
Logged
TheIcelandicManiac Offline
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
*
Posts: 6294


« Reply #46 on: May 22, 2011, 10:34:44 am »

Fuck you too cloud.

Srsly after 2 days of playing blitz and finnaly getting a hold of an heavytank that aint an jagd i find a thread like this that is about how nooby i am becouse i enjoy using a tank.
Logged

Quote from: Grundwaffe
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Smiley
Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.

Work Harder
brn4meplz Offline
Misinformation Officer
*
Posts: 6952


« Reply #47 on: May 22, 2011, 10:36:35 am »

Don't worry. Back when Heavy tanks were a liability people still made the same claim.
Logged

He thinks Tactics is a breath mint

Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  Tongue

the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom Wink
shockcoil Offline
griefer & spammer
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1566



« Reply #48 on: May 22, 2011, 10:37:56 am »

Despite your admirable attempt to machinize everything, I highly doubt there is no subjective, constant way to mathematically calculate fun based on the usage of units. I personally find it fun to use superheavy tanks, and in no way do I believe it allows me to win easier than using regular medium tanks, quite the opposite in fact, I win more often on my companies that don't use superheavies. I only use superheavies because they are FUN in my opinion.
You must have missed the part where he said that the assumption that Heavy Tanks require less skill to use is a subjective viewpoint.
Logged

Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #49 on: May 22, 2011, 12:18:08 pm »

Everything can be machinised. And there's nothing wrong with that.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #50 on: May 22, 2011, 01:21:45 pm »

While I agree running double pershings is easier, running sherman spam with OBM and Crew efficiency (or just T4 mobile warfare) is amazing. Just takes more skill to pull off, but damn it's probably one of the most fun armour builds I've ever played.

i did see someone play with this, moving shermans that can shoot and repair, they were pretty successful, plus they always seemed to have a upguned sherman or two on that was supported well.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
cloud234 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 363


« Reply #51 on: May 22, 2011, 03:19:44 pm »

So let me get this straight cloud, your screwed-up sense of honor or something tells you that heavy/superheavy tanks are "too easy" to use, and so you refuse to use them, and then try to inflict this on everyone else by nerfing them? It's like saying, "I'm going to bring a knife to a gunfight because I feel that guns are overpowered!" The fact that you believe they are dishonorable or whatever dos not in any way make them a less-viable tactic.

If I do indeed perceive them to be imbalance, I gather thats the tone you're going by... whats wrong with being a fair player and stating something is OP? By that logic, you're saying that no one should ever state anything is OP.

I never said its less-viable. Funny how you can't seem to read or understand what the post is about. Here's a clue:

Its an observation

... I win more often on my companies that don't use superheavies. I only use superheavies because they are FUN in my opinion.

Fuck you too cloud.

Srsly after 2 days of playing blitz and finnaly getting a hold of an heavytank that aint an jagd i find a thread like this that is about how nooby i am becouse i enjoy using a tank.

Sorry, but you're really begging for a "L2P" comment weren't you?  Grin

Don't worry. Back when Heavy tanks were a liability people still made the same claim.

There's a huge difference between back then and now. That is the most horrible claim ever.

1. Muntions were scarce and upgrades were expensive in vEiR.
2. EiR:R came about, munitions became abundant, yada yada, doctrines were different and KCH w/ Oakleafs was not present.
3. EiR:R repair system were in various implementations
4. ATG did not cost 5 popcap
Logged
Sachaztan Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2667



« Reply #52 on: May 22, 2011, 03:37:29 pm »


Just like Glenn Beck only "asks questions" Tongue

Logged

Demon posession is real and it's not funny, it's the creepiest thing you will ever experience.

I would also like to add I watch fox news everyday all day and will continue to watch it while being proud of that fact. I'm sure you enjoy your communist news network just as much.
Vermillion_Hawk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1282



« Reply #53 on: May 22, 2011, 08:44:41 pm »

Well, Cloud, making a thread about how only noobs use heavy/superheavy tanks then deploying two Pershings is kind of counter-productive to your main thesis. I'll even post the replay once I get it figured out.
Logged
cloud234 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 363


« Reply #54 on: May 22, 2011, 08:46:25 pm »

I've posted it for you already  Grin

You can look it up in the Replay Section.
Logged
Poppi Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1080


« Reply #55 on: May 22, 2011, 11:19:54 pm »

I hardly count 2 pershings as depending on super heavy tanks.

Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #56 on: May 23, 2011, 02:04:11 am »

Shh. Having a Pershing is entirely different than having any other heavy tank. First of all Pershing is fast, has good accuracy and good splash and has good armor. Compared to any other heavy tank known to man

- Tiger is le shit
- Panther loses to Pershing more or less
- KT/Jagd etc are Super Heavies.

If anything Pershing is the best Heavy tank there is due to its speed. Saying that running a pershing company is easy mode is honestly the truth.

All the other heavy armor classes are medicore compared to this one.

KT and Jagd as they are Super heavies they can't be considered as heavies due to them being well- super. Where Jagdpanther is only Anti tank, KT excells at both in its medicore way.
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
panzerman Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689


« Reply #57 on: May 23, 2011, 02:09:31 am »

KT is le shit at AI. more a AT tank.
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #58 on: May 23, 2011, 02:16:15 am »

KT 'excels' at taking hits,not so much at inflicting them.
Logged
Malgoroth Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 960


« Reply #59 on: May 23, 2011, 03:06:34 am »

I agree that the Pershing is by far the best of the heavies/super heavies. In this game environment, speed is everything.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 36 queries.